Open Letter to Dr. Ron Paul

CyberCod

Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2008
Messages
10
Dear Dr. Paul,

I've been following your campaign for a while, and I've watched some of your speeches and appearances via YouTube and other such avenues.

Dr. Paul, frankly, even though I feel like you are the only candidate up there who is truly qualified for the job, who actually deserves it, it is becoming more and more apparent that the other side has won or is about to.

The corruption in the media has effectively suppressed your message. They have marginalized your message in the eyes and ears of Mr. and Mrs. Joe Average and there are still more people that don't even know what you represent than there are supporting you.

Corrupt politicians, 'newscasters' who are motivated by corporate memos rather than a search for truth, and an apathetic public that has already lost hope that anything will ever change has blunted your battlecry of "Freedom."

I have told people that I meet about your campaign. I believe I have opened some eyes, but not enough.

Can I do more? Yes.

Can I do enough to ensure your victory? No.

Have you yourself done everything you can, Mr. Paul?

I have watched you outsmart them. I have watched you outclass them. I have watched you take what they throw at you in stride. I have watched you turn the other cheek time and time again. I admire your patience.

But the time for turning the other cheek is past, Dr. Paul. It is time to get angry. It is time to stand up for yourself. For us. For this country. We your supporters are definitely angry.

We stand on the brink of watching this most important of positions become filled with just another puppet of the military industrial complex.

We watch as our national wealth gets emptied into a few already-overfull pockets.

We watch as high-treason goes unpunished.

It is time to get mad. Ghandi may not have lost his temper. But Ghandi was not an American. Pacifism is not a concept that is wholly accepted by America, nor should it be. If we were a nation of pacifists we would not need the right to bear arms. We have that right so that we can fight, in bloody battle if need be, the tyranny that is so easily seen in our so called leaders.

But now we are here behind you Ron. Now we are ready to fight. And you keep turning the other cheek. You are not standing alone in congress, one voice against the many. You do not have to be so passive agressive anymore, regular agression is what is needed here. It is our passivity that has our government enboldened to take our freedoms away. If they thought for a minute that a million American citizens would be coming over the hill with shotguns and homemade bombs to lynch the whole lot of them, they might act a little differently. If they thought that we would stand up and hold an Article V Convention and re-write our laws ourselves, they might take their oaths a little more seriously, and treat it less like a cash cow.

But they don't believe that will ever happen. They believe that we will continue to wave signs and chant and be a nuisance. And they will continue to ignore us.

And they believe that is as far as it will ever ever go.

But they're wrong.

It is time to stand up and tell them you have had enough of being marginalized. Because until you do, people will continue to believe them when they call you a crazy old kook. When the other candidates are sitting there with their smarmy smiles that turn my stomach... when they laugh inwardly at how they get all the attention even though they're as crooked as cooked spaghetti, while the real McCoy sits right beside them and is not recognized for the solid true hope that he represents, that is when you need to get angry. Right then.

While bad foreign policy got us into the mess we're in, and proper foreign policy will eventually get us out of it, people need to know that you have what it takes to deal with another terrorist attack, should one occur. You have shown everyone that you have brains and morals. But now they need to see the steel beneath.

Just look at the damage that has been done to our wonderful nation by the corruption that is present in ALL THREE BRANCHES of government. And think forward to the damage that will be done by your opponents should you fail.

Stand up Dr Paul. Get angry. Stop smiling. You have to show the American people that you not only have the brains and the ideals neccessary, but you have the will to command, and the self respect to punch someone in the mouth if they disrespect you. Equal respect for everyone means you must respect yourself just as much as you do anyone else.

If you do not get angry, if you do not denounce the media directly for how you have been treated, if you do not do this, you can not truly say that you did everything that you could.

Dr. Paul, I hope and pray that you will win. Even though in the short term, some of your policies will make my life much harder for my family. Income Tax time is a time that people like me look forward to. Earned Income Credit and the fact that my wife and I have a child means that I get back a couple thousand dollars more than I put in. If you are elected, you propose to make the IRS go away, and in conjunction, that yearly tax check will go away as well. But losing that yearly windfall is worth it to see something done about the rampant corruption in Washington.

I have not been able to afford to contribute monetarily. My bills are behind right now as it is. But your victory is in my thoughts, wishes, and prayers.

We the people are pissed off, Dr. Paul, to put it mildly. As our representative, shouldn't you be as well?

Your opponents are dirty lying scum who deserve to be taken to task for who they really represent. I hope and pray that next time you are at a debate, you come out of your corner swinging!

The problem as I see it is that you do not appeal to the mob mind, the inner part of us that loves to watch domestic disputes on daytime TV and scream "Jerry! Jerry! Jerry!" Your ideas and ideals are impeccable, but that does not endear you to all the ordinary Joes and Mikes and Bob's that will gather around today to watch a grueling Superbowl Sunday. And in order to get in that Oval Office you MUST appeal to these people. As much as I hate him, Rudy Gulliani knows how to portray a commanding presence. Like when he tried to rebut your comments about the cause of 9/11. Of course he was wrong, but he showed strength there, and the mob noticed. They noticed enough to take a better look at Rudy, which subsequently left them dissatisfied. But if they take a closer look at you, Dr. Paul, they will not go away dissatisfied. Instead they will become a supporter.

Perhaps THAT is where Mitt and John's smarmy smiles were coming from as you sat in the Reagan Library and denounced their pitiful contrivances of foreign policy and economic security. They knew that as you sat there speaking sound and fruitful truths about what is going on and what needs to happen, that the eyes and ears of the general public are glazing over. They know that the common man doesn't understand economics or the finer points of diplomacy. They know who their audience is, whereas when you began this you had no idea who your audience would turn out to be. They know that the mob mentality does not understand your words. The mob doesn't have the vocabulary for it. The mob is just slightly impressed with your "smartness" but not enough to vote for you over a scrapper like McCain. Or a pretty boy like Mittens.

What about Mittens? Yes, Romney is funding his own campaign. But why? President's salary isn't all that much in comparison to a business shark like Mitt. Obviosly he has some plan to get his money back. How do you think he intends to do this? By milking this country for every dime he can squeeze out of it. Its just simple ROI. Return On Investment. Romney is smart. He's worked it out. Call him out on it. Ask him how he plans on getting his money back. Ask him to detail how he got his fortune in the first place, by tearing apart companies and throwing them to the wolves. By laying off and firing people wholesale. You do not need to sling mud, you only have to shine a light on the mud he is already covered in.

McCain seems like he genuinely believes what he is saying, but he is just so far off from reality that while I think I could get to like his character, if he were to go all the way we'd just get another term of a president who feels he doesn't need to listen to anyone else, including congress or the American people. He would use the powers that the Bush Administration have gathered up and he would rule this country with an iron fist, and a deaf ear. Because McCain knows best, or at least he believes he does. Ask McCain if he will continue President Bush's habit of sequestering protesters out of his sight and ignoring his opposition. Ask McCain how he will deal with dissent. Ask McCain how he will keep himself from breaking Bush's all time record of low approval ratings as he bankrupts our country to fight a war that even our troops think is pointless.


On the subject of your congressional bid, I would like to say that while I understand the logic in running your congressional campaign concurrently, it feels like you are hedging your bets. And while I would rather have you in congress than to not have your voice in Washington at all, it just deadens my spirit to think that you yourself have accepted that you will not win, but that you just go on so as not to disappoint us by quitting early.

Say it ain't so. Please. Give this everything you've got.

Get angry.

Get loud.

Get noticed.

God bless you Ron Paul,

Jeff Smith,

Registered Republican
Russell Springs KY
 
Why would you post something negative right off the bat? The man is 72-years-old.
 
As much as I wish he would do something like you said here, I think he is very much a Gandhi moral-driven person. If you think about it, if he broke down and started throwing dirt like these other candidates we all would probably find ourselves (though entertained) a bit disappointed that the belief we support became the mainstream. We're trying to convert the mainstream, we can't become them in the process if we want to change it (look at McCain as a perfect example of a person with conservative views that gets mixed up by the machine).

If Ron Paul loses this fight, he will only be a martyr to us all. Though he may not win now, he will have 1000 people fighting for his cause the next election cycle in higher positions yet if he dropped to their level and lost our support this "revolution" would die since we wouldn't find our motivation continuing.
 
Watch this. It is current and from campaign HQ:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T0nJH6zB9VM


Thanks, I feel a little better.

To the other reply that said that we basically need to convert the masses (mainstream) to our way of thinking, the masses have thought the way they do for eons. As far back as Rome and the Colliseum. You cannot artificially raise the IQ of our entire nation to where they will understand the jargon that goes along with Dr. Paul's platform. You just end up making them feel stupid. Which means they will not vote for Dr. Paul. They will vote for the candidate that makes them feel self-important.

What is NEEDED here is to have all the candidates in a round table meeting, with NO proctor, no live audience, just cameras. Maybe a deck of cards.

Then the people would get a real idea of who these people really are.

Is it still considered slinging dirt if you say it to their face?

I'm not talking about dirty advertisements, I'm talking about getting angry when he is slighted on the debates. And when he says his piece against the media, he isn't slamming another candidate, now is he.
 
Last edited:
Thanks, I feel a little better.

To the other reply that said that we basically need to convert the masses (mainstream) to our way of thinking, the masses have thought the way they do for eons. As far back as Rome and the Colliseum. You cannot artificially raise the IQ of our entire nation to where they will understand the jargon that goes along with Dr. Paul's platform. You just end up making them feel stupid. Which means they will not vote for Dr. Paul. They will vote for the candidate that makes them feel self-important.

What is NEEDED here is to have all the candidates in a round table meeting, with NO proctor, no live audience, just cameras. Maybe a deck of cards.

Then the people would get a real idea of who these people really are.

Is it still considered slinging dirt if you say it to their face?

I'm not talking about dirty advertisements, I'm talking about getting angry when he is slighted on the debates. And when he says his piece against the media, he isn't slamming another candidate, now is he.

If you and enough other people get angry we win, if Ron Paul gets angry, we lose. Take your anger out on our enemies, organize boycotts of the media and it's sponsors, you will not hurt them by trying to push Paul into becoming another Howard Dean.
 
If you and enough other people get angry we win, if Ron Paul gets angry, we lose. Take your anger out on our enemies, organize boycotts of the media and it's sponsors, you will not hurt them by trying to push Paul into becoming another Howard Dean.

Sure dude, whatever.

I wasn't writing the letter to you anyway. As you can see the title isn't "Open letter to some random guy on RonPaulForums.org" I posted it on my blog as well, and I put that on Digg... so far its getting a little attention. If it gets big enough perhaps Ron will read it. In any case, I didn't write it so that I could sit and defend my beliefs against forum enforcers. If the man is unapproachable now, that doesn't bode well for how it will be when he becomes president.

Now I gotta go find out who Howard Dean is. :P

In case you were reading too literally, I don't mean the man should physically punch anyone. Its a figure of speech.

Y'know, a lot of people are getting involved in this election that haven't been politically charged at any time before in their lives. Before now I personally couldn't give a rats ass who ran the country because I honestly couldn't tell any difference between one smarmy plastic smile and another smarmy plastic smile.

As a result of this newly minted involvement, I don't get it when you name-drop so and so, because up until now, I didn't care enough to remember names.

Sorry for that, but thats what happens when political activism gets new blood.

Anyone else got bad things to say about what I wrote? Fine. Let 'er rip.

How about a showing of hands as to who agrees with me?
 
CyberCod,

Have you become a delegate for Ron Paul and a Precinct leader for your area?
 
Last edited:
Problem is there is a fine line between righteous indignation and real anger.

He does have the righteous indignation part down pretty well, as was demonstrated in the debate where he took on Huckabee and the moderator about the war in Iraq and had his great line "We should take our marching orders from the Constitution!"

Ron Paul is who he is, and if he tries to become "angry" just to score political points it could easily backfire and lessen his credibility.

And don't think for a minute that he is not credible. He is. His opponents know it and the talking heads in the MSM know it. Why else do they try so hard to ignore and marginalize him?

So I don't think we will ever see this type of transformation from Ron Paul.

I just hope that there will be a new crop of politicians coming up in the next few years who accept Ron Paul's positions, are not afraid to associate themselves with his good name, and who have the charisma and fire to win over the mob and the masses.

The rEVOLution is just beginning....
 
"Don't cast your pearls before swine"... and watch out for mental/verbal ... diarrhea, cha cha cha, diarrhea cha cha cha.
 
I think he already comes off as too angry. So good luck with your request for a show of hands.
 
I can understand the OP's frustration. But, I think Ron Paul is who he is. He introduced many to the ideals of freedom and liberty. He struck a chord with all who are supporting him. So much in fact, he has turned apathy into activism. That is his strength.

That being said, I am encouraged by the OP's passion. I think someone with his fire may do well at running for something at the local level!
 
You Fail to see

What you fail to see is that with 4 guys on the stage he cannot deliver the death blow because it is disbursed between them. If he gets momentum they can team up on him. Would it not be great when Huckelby is out, and Romney drops out....then on the stage where the media cannot black him out he delivers aggressive blow after blow against a single target? Thats how you win. He has to wait until the end. Only 10% of people know who he is....he has to be on stage, one on one with the last man then his face will be on every paper. We have to keep spreading the word. People need to see his name on our yard signs because they don't know who he is!
 
Ron Paul is waiting to get more assertive. He won't get angry, it's not his style. We have to wait for McCain to lead and Romney and Huck to pull out.

McCain can totally loose his temper and that won't TV well for him. Ron Paul cool demeanor will prevail.

After it's just down to McCain & Ron, Ron should go 3rd party.

With Obama making serious progress, it's quite possible that the final choice will be McCain, Obama and Ron Paul.

Seriously, who's going to win that one!
 
Dr. Paul, I hope and pray that you will win. Even though in the short term, some of your policies will make my life much harder for my family. Income Tax time is a time that people like me look forward to. Earned Income Credit and the fact that my wife and I have a child means that I get back a couple thousand dollars more than I put in. If you are elected, you propose to make the IRS go away, and in conjunction, that yearly tax check will go away as well. But losing that yearly windfall is worth it to see something done about the rampant corruption in Washington.

Good letter and stunning admission. Ron Paul does need to show his angry side a little. Call the others out on their lies.
 
I dont get you people who demand he gets "angry". Have you not been following Ron for long? He's spent a hell of alot of time being "angry". He's pretty much denounced the last 80 years of US history and called out the culprits. There has not been a Presidential candidate who has called out those bastards and spoke so much truth , probably EVER. Think for a minute on what he has done.

I think the exact opposite. Ron needs to be more likable and talk about the goodness of America/ns . He needs to give the people some hope and paint a picture of how much better a Ron Paul Presidency would be.

Why? because your average Joe isnt after a history lesson , especially when the lesson contains the truth that the US hasnt always been the "good guys". There are alot of pseudo-patriots in America who like to feel good about themselves and their country. They want hope.. and Ron has offered hardly any at all.
Also, believe it or not, but your average Joe and your moderate Neo-Cons (same thing?) already think he is "an angry old man". Infact , these same people were really beginning to like Ron Paul in the debate before last. Why? because it was the 1st debate that Ron wasnt so heavy on the American foreign policy failures and evils.
Since the majority of us are up to speed on political history and the influence of the MIC and the media ,we are angry ..very angry. Your average Joe? not so much. We want Ron Paul to get really angry and act as our revenge tool. Its understandable, but foolhardy. He needs votes and moderate neocons and your average joe is who he needs to get them off.

Know your target and play to its weakness.

.
 
Last edited:
Y'know, I agree with the whole non-interventionalism and all that. I really do. But nowhere in all of the Libertarian dogma/doctrine, does it state that you should let an entity walk all over you without fear of reprisal.

The Libertarian view is that war should be declared, I'm all for that as well.

Perhaps we, as Ron Paul supporters, need to declare war on the media.




CyberCod,

Have you become a delegate for Ron Paul and a Precinct leader for your area?

I don't have a single solitary clue as to how to go about that, or what it entails.

Care to clue me in?

If it involves money, I can't. As I already mentioned, I'm completely broke.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top