On Paul's Speech: "Isolationist says it's Americas fault"

Valli6

Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2008
Messages
4,434
Pushing the same old lies; isolationist, conspiracy theories, "America's fault", etc...

RAND PAUL: IT'S AMERICA'S FAULT
by DR. SEBASTIAN GORKA 27 Oct 2014, 6:31 AM

Clearly, for some, 2016 is just around the corner. For weeks now there is scuttlebutt about presidential candidate repeat-offender Mitt Romney running yet again, and now Rand Paul is drastically watering down his isolationist and conspiracy-laden past in the hopes of becoming a contender. The senator's attempt to reinvent himself is largely superficial and points to deeper problems.

On Friday in New York, Paul gave his national security stump speech, unveiling as he did so his platform of "conservative realism," and sounding in places as if he was reversing some of his key beliefs.

Like the "curates egg," there were some bad parts and some positive elements to the speech. To begin with, when the politician most associated with the new version of libertarianism that favors a United States detached from the world says "America cannot disengage from the world," that is news, indeed-- and something to be welcomed by those who agree that we cannot realistically and safely disengage internationally.

But the omissions of the speech are strange and hard to fathom. No mention of Israel; no mention of the border or immigration; no mention of the NSA trammeling our privacy rights.

However, it is hard to disagree with the Senator that our forces were magnificent in the weeks after 9/11 as a small group of Special Operators with local assistance demolished the Taleban and routed Al Qaeda, and that afterward their success was progressively undermined by ever-increasing mission-creep.

And it is easy to agree with Paul's utter contempt for the way in which, more recently, the Obama administration used force in Libya without a real strategy, let alone Congressional consent.

But then taken as a whole, the speech is neither an about-turn for the isolationist-- sorry Paulites, I mean "non-interventionist"-- politician, nor does it add up to a new plan under which the right will finally act coherently on national security issues.

On the contrary, it is confused and disingenuous. Let's begin with the confusion.

In a week that saw two jihadist attacks in Canada and one in New York, one would expect a trenchant and forthright handling of the threat that has shaped our age. Instead Paul gave us this:

The world does not have an Islam problem, the world has a dignity problem, with millions of men and women across the Middle East being treated as chattel by their own governments.

Sorry? A dignity problem? Who denied Osama bin Laden or Major Nidal Hasan, the Fort Hood shooter, their dignity? Perhaps the Boston bombers were denied their dignity, but not because they lived in a Middle Eastern nation where the government treated them as property. On the contrary, if their dignity was undermined it was in the form of the Massachusetts state subsidies they received without having to earn them (something the younger Tsarnaev actually boasted about on social media).

So where could this newfound concern for the downtrodden of the world come from for Senator Paul? In truth, the old Rand Paul is lurking just beneath the surface, as this line reveals: "Many of these same governments have been chronic recipients of our aid." So, Islam is not to blame for jihadi terrorism. America is, because we support unjust regimes.

The fact that Paul uses this argument is not only disturbing in that it negates the responsibility of the jihadists - it's their governments, and America that keeps them in power - but also because this is the fallacious reasoning behind the Obama's administration's counterterrorism strategy.

Senator Paul is not only channeling Chomsky with this speech, he has also reinforced the White House line that ideology is irrelevant in this war and that terrorism is understandably a result of the oppression of Muslims around the word.

Perhaps none of this should be a surprise. We are talking about a man who believes in Alex Jones' one-world government conspiracy theories about the Bilderberg Group and that evil masterminds want to create a unitary state out of America, Canada and Latin America. Hardly presidential material.

Sebastian Gorka PhD is the Matthew C. Horner Distinguished Chair of Military Theory, Marine Corps University, and National Security Affairs Editor for Breitbart. com. Follow him on Twitter at: @ SebGorka.
http:// www. breitbart. com/Big-Peace/2014/10/27/Rand-Paul-It-s-America-s-Fault
 
It is so heartwarming to see the breitbart folk joining up and becoming democrats.
Below please find a response from DNC National Press Secretary Michael Czin to Paul’s vision:

“It’s disappointing that Rand Paul, as a Senator and a potential presidential candidate, blames America for all the problems in the world, while offering reckless ideas that would only alienate us from the global community.

“Unfortunately, this is nothing new for Paul. Last week he criticized American policy to the president of another country on foreign soil. This week he’s blaming the Obama Administration for another nation’s civil war. That type of “blame America” rhetoric may win Paul accolades at a conference of isolationists but it does nothing to improve our standing in the world. In fact, Paul’s proposals would make America less safe and less secure.

“Simply put, if Rand Paul had a foreign policy slogan, it would be – The Rand Paul Doctrine: Blame America. Retreat from the World.”
 
This Gorka fellow is hard to track: wikipedia has a bunch of dead links to DoD profiles, and his only solo publication can't be found.

His listed Phd University has a very sparse webpage that doesn't like to phd candidates, or even a listing of professors.

There was one "creator" for his wiki page, "malakbel", who's account was responsible ONLY for his page in 2011, then disappeared.

There is nothing of his life that was public before 2009, and since then he has been a "military expert".
 
SPEECH WINS BREATHLESS PRAISE FROM LIBERAL MEDIA

Another neocon smear piece from the folks at breitbart.
RAND PAUL SPEECH WINS BREATHLESS PRAISE FROM LIBERAL MEDIA
by JOEL B. POLLAK 27 Oct 2014, 7:16 AM

Sen. Rand Paul gave a very interesting foreign policy speech last week, laying out the case for "conservative realism." The task of balancing small-government ideals with national security needs is one with which our country has grappled since its founding. My colleague, Dr. Sebastian Gorka, has addressed the substance of the speech. More interesting, perhaps, is the effusive praise it won from the liberal wonks at Ezra Klein's Vox.com.

"Rand Paul just gave one of the most important foreign policy speeches in decades," gushed Zack Beauchamp, whose Vox.com profile identifies him as "Dictator-for-Life."

One suspects that even Sen. Paul himself would balk at such absurd hyperbole. But the speech was important, Beauchamp says, because "instead of declaring war on another country, Paul declared war on his own party. Or, at least, its entire approach to foreign policy."

Clearly, Vox.com and its left-wing allies hope to use Sen. Paul the way that his father, retired Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX), allowing himself to be used--as a weapon against Republicans in the presidential primary.

It is doubtful that Sen. Paul intends himself to be exploited that way: he has done considerable work to distance himself from his father's views, notably on Israel, and is trying to make a run for the presidency that is serious, not symbolic.

But for the left, the differences between Sen. Paul and the Republican Party must be maintained, even at the cost of throwing Obama under the bus somewhat (note how his own slew of speeches over the past decade are suddenly deemed unimportant).

The left wants Sen. Paul to be marginalized, but not before using him to do fresh damage to the GOP brand. He should be wary of their excessive praise, whatever shape his policies take.

Senior Editor-at-Large Joel B. Pollak edits Breitbart California and is the author of the new ebook, Wacko Birds: The Fall (and Rise) of the Tea Party, available for Amazon Kindle.

bb. com/Big-Peace/2014/10/27/Rand-Paul-Speech-Wins-Breathless-Praise-from-Liberal-Media
 
This Gorka fellow is hard to track: wikipedia has a bunch of dead links to DoD profiles, and his only solo publication can't be found.

His listed Phd University has a very sparse webpage that doesn't like to phd candidates, or even a listing of professors.

There was one "creator" for his wiki page, "malakbel", who's account was responsible ONLY for his page in 2011, then disappeared.

There is nothing of his life that was public before 2009, and since then he has been a "military expert".

Malakbel is the name of a pre-Islamic Syrian Sun god.

Whoever is promoting Gorka has an interest in Syria, doesn't like Islam qua Islam, and has a knowledge of ancient mid-east history.
 
This Gorka fellow is hard to track: wikipedia has a bunch of dead links to DoD profiles, and his only solo publication can't be found.

His listed Phd University has a very sparse webpage that doesn't like to phd candidates, or even a listing of professors.

There was one "creator" for his wiki page, "malakbel", who's account was responsible ONLY for his page in 2011, then disappeared.

There is nothing of his life that was public before 2009, and since then he has been a "military expert".

Maybe somebody should mark his wiki profile for deletion as not newsworthy or whatever the tag is.
 
Pushing the same old lies; isolationist, conspiracy theories, "America's fault", etc...

http:// www. breitbart. com/Big-Peace/2014/10/27/Rand-Paul-It-s-America-s-Fault

A good reply should be titled: "BREITBART---Let's Keep Hawking the Lies," and would be chock full of documentation (from government files, official admissions, etc) about how western intelligence operations have been fomenting or false-flagging coups and civil wars across the planet for decades. Hit 'em hard with, where were the WMDs, who forged the Niger document, who almost lied us into war with Syria last year over a non-existent chemical attack, etc. Challenge claims about threats being just about everywhere, with evidence that we've been lied to about threats just about everywhere. Challenge the pro-war framework at its core.
 
Malakbel is the name of a pre-Islamic Syrian Sun god.

Whoever is promoting Gorka has an interest in Syria, doesn't like Islam qua Islam, and has a knowledge of ancient mid-east history.

You have just identified another 'Mockingbird' stooge.
 
Back
Top