Occultist brought baby Jesus his gifts.
His birth was predicted by astrologist. I guess they are in hell now for their occult beliefs.

This circus is great entertainment. Please tell everyone how it is... a universal god of only one tribe of men.
This is a perfect example of how men can twist the Bible in many directions by taking parts of it out of context to mislead the ignorant masses.
The nativity scene and Christmas are lies:
1) The gift bearers were Magi. The correct meaning is astrologer. Since the Law held the death penalty for any Jew who practiced astrology, what sense would it make that God would lead astrologers to Jesus?
2) There is no mention of how many Magi visited Jesus. There may have been 3 or 33.
3) The Magi came years after Jesus was born. They visited the 'house' where Jesus lived and Mary brought the 'young child' out of the house for the visitors to see.
4) Herod, after "carefully ascertaining the time of the birth" in consultation with these Magi, ordered all male children aged 2 years and younger to be killed.
5) Jesus was not born in December. This has been (and is every year at christmas) discussed in detail by many people over the centuries.
6) Jews didn't celebrate their birthdays. This is a pagan custom. There are only 2 birthday celebrations mentioned in the Bible, those of Pharaoh and Herod, at each of which celebrations a man was beheaded.
Yes, the Romans, in understanding that there is strength in numbers, decided to meld the Pagan festivities of Saturnalia, the winter solstice, the shortest day of the year, after which the days get longer, or... the birth of the SUN... with the Christian belief that salvation is through the birth of the SON.
Yes, they succeeded in using this (and other such devious acts) to control Christianity by changing Magi to Wise Men, and placing them at the scene of Jesus' birth, which date they moved to December 25 to correspond with their pagan festival. The tree with candles, the yule log, the merriment, the exchanging of gifts, etc., were 'Christianized' by organized religion to bring Christians into the fold and under governmental control.
But, this in no way has changed the Bible account or its message.
As far as the universal God of only one tribe of men goes, we are all from one tribe of men, no? Does science disagree with this fact?
As Paul said, the Law was but a shadow of the reality.
Earthly paradise in Eden, perfect pair who chose autonomy/death, The Chosen Ones, 12 tribes, king, high priest, sacrifices for atonement, the temple, the Law, the alien resident, war with pagan enemies, hope of resurrection, etc.
The foretold Messiah arrives, right on schedule. His ministry? To preach the good news of the Kingdom of the Heavens. He is King and High Priest in the manner of Melchizedek. He introduces the thought of a resurrection into this heavenly Kingdom. He provides the needed sacrifice, but once for all time. He speaks of a future war to end all wars with his Father's pagan enemies. He fulfills all requirements for the job and answers all questions correctly. He feeds the hungry, heals the sick and resurrects the dead to show his qualifications.
So, which is it, immortal soul to heaven/hell, or resurrection of the dead?
God told Adam, "In that day, you will positively die. ... for from dust you were made, to dust you will return." Did he lie? Did he really somehow instead mean, "... you're body will die, but your immortal soul will be sent to a place where I'll see to it that you are tortured forever."?
Of course the idea of a universal God of only one tribe of men is absurd. But, not when viewed as it is clearly spelled out. The one tribe of chosen was a shadow of the reality. The Kingdom of God is the main theme of the Bible.
For such a simple concept, it's hard to understand how it's been hidden from most religions over the centuries. They proudly set up their nativity scene in front of their churches every year and participate in pagan rituals that predate Jesus by centuries.
This corruption of the truth, I fully understand and agree that it took place, as well as the why of it. The evidence is everywhere and overwhelming. I only disagree with the notion that the Bible itself was also corrupted to say anything that contradicts what God intended it to say and inspired men to write in it.
Bosso