On Capitalist Jesus. The Evil of Christianity.

Removing some incriminating pictures, the name lucifer as the author, etc.

Who cares who posted it, I'm sure he probably didn't write it himself either. The pictures were irrelevant to the post and I found them in poor taste as well. Also, never once was did I mention where I stood on the post's contents.

And the OP's name was luciferhorus, it's well known that the illuminati claim to be luciferian, and horus has been plagiarized by the bible. His name on the david icke forum, taken in context to where he's posting, isn't all that shocking.

Even in HOT TOPICS on this forum it seems one can't ask questions about 9/11 or doubt the claims of religion. It seems its more follow the leader and know your role or catch hell. Where is the liberty in that? :(
 
Last edited:
FINALLY, the discussion I wanted to spur...

What would that discussion be, LA_Truth?
The thread was topical, doesn't matter how controversial it may have been.
What was "topical" about it?

The only thing "controversial" I see, is that you chose to copy someone's post that seemed to be advocating Communism. Did you realize that when you copied it?
 
What would that discussion be, LA_Truth?

What was "topical" about it?

The only thing "controversial" I see, is that you chose to copy someone's post that seemed to be advocating Communism. Did you realize that when you copied it?

See the last 10 pages.
 
Oh, I've seen it.

I'm asking you what you meant by this comment.

Since apparently, the past 10 pages were not going as you hoped them to go.

So spell it out. What was your intent with this thread?

It's getting to the point where I totally disregard your posts entirely.

How do you know which way I wanted this post to go? You're obvious bias against me when it comes to religious discussion is seeping from your e-pores.

And to answer your question:
What was your intent with this thread?

T O ... S P U R ... D I S C U S S I O N

What were you expecting? Me to say I'm an agent of Satan trying to undermine the movement? Hardly.

Being a MOD I would expect you to hold yourself to a higher standard and lead by example. You don't.
 
Discussion in and of itself is not a goal of these boards. So maybe state your goals as being to have a specific discussion? Or perhaps to hear and understand alternate points of view on a subject?
 
The only thing "controversial" I see, is that you chose to copy someone's post that seemed to be advocating Communism. Did you realize that when you copied it?

I also have been catching your various attempts trying to bait me into saying that I advocate communism. Do you wish to ban me that bad as to resort to such elementary tactics? I do not believe the OP advocated communism in any way, it showed the inconsistencies of the bibles wording with Christianity's teaching as we live today more than anything. ;)
 
Discussion in and of itself is not a goal of these boards. So maybe state your goals as being to have a specific discussion? Or perhaps to hear and understand alternate points of view on a subject?

Then we would all post pictures, not words. And wanting to hear someone else's view on said topic should go without saying, or why else would you post it? That should be "understood" and left silent, like "you" in the sentence "Go."
 
Last edited:
The OP is full of holes and total miscomprehension as outlined in the previous pages. Yet, suprisingly, some people seem to think that the Bible does in fact advocate communism.

Well, not everyone here does in fact want to hear from others. You keep trying to fit yourself into that category. Half the time I dunno why you post stuff.

Posting a bunch of controversial content with no introduction, then turning around pages later and saying you don't agree with anything you posted, is not a form of effective communication.
 
Last edited:
It's getting to the point where I totally disregard your posts entirely.

How do you know which way I wanted this post to go?
I didn't. Which is why I asked you TWICE. That's ok. I've figured it out now. ;)

You're obvious bias against me when it comes to religious discussion is seeping from your e-pores.
:rolleyes: It's apparent from your posts that it's not "religious discussion" that you desire. It's a certain type of religious discussion; which so happens to be all about bashing Christianity.
And to answer your question:


T O ... S P U R ... D I S C U S S I O N

What were you expecting? Me to say I'm an agent of Satan trying to undermine the movement? Hardly.
No. I thought you just might be honest about where you were wanting this thread to go.

Being a MOD I would expect you to hold yourself to a higher standard and lead by example. You don't.
:rolleyes:
 
No. I thought you just might be honest about where you were wanting this thread to go.

You caught me, I'm an agent of Satan. :eek:

And you claim to have figured it out when I still have said NOTHING in regards to my opinion of the OP.

And was it about bashing Christianity? In a way. Sure. I'm not christian and I do believe it's a bit silly. There are many threads regarding this issue, yet you are focusing on mine.

Now I have engaged myself in 2 pages of defending myself on views you assume I have. You would be a perfect candidate for Obama's precrime unit.
 
Last edited:
I also have been catching your various attempts trying to bait me into saying that I advocate communism. Do you wish to ban me that bad as to resort to such elementary tactics? I do not believe the OP advocated communism in any way, it showed the inconsistencies of the bibles wording with Christianity's teaching as we live today more than anything. ;)

I'm not baiting you. I'm just asking a question. The fact that you're imagining all the rest though, is rather interesting.
 
You caught me, I'm an agent of Satan. :eek:

And you claim to have figured it out when I still have said NOTHING in regards to my opinion of the OP.

:rolleyes:

And you claim to have figured it out when I still have said NOTHING in regards to my opinion of the OP.
Geez, this is frustrating.

YOU made the comment...
FINALLY, the discussion I wanted to spur.
Which implies that you did not like the discussion that was going on previously. Thus, my question.
 
Last edited:
Which implies that you did not like the discussion that was going on previously. Thus, my question.

How does saying "finally the discussion I wanted to spur" indicate a leaning to any side? The 1st few pages were ad hominem attacks and nothing on topic, the last 10 pages were discussion about the OP. Like I said, FINALLY A DISCUSSION, does the wanted to spur throw you off? It was merely using words to liven up the sentence.

Had I not posted that I'm sure this thread would have lived on, but you derailed it with more assumptions. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
So every time someone posts an article here he agrees with it by default?

Ya. Or would mention that you don't agree with it. Obviously.

There can be thousands of posts per day from people who believe pretty much anything. So if you don't disclaim it then everyone will assume you agree with it.

If you do what you have done in this thread then we assume you have some sort of agenda.
 
If you do what you have done in this thread then we assume you have some sort of agenda.

I see your point, however I did post that it was taken from elsewhere. I just didn't post my stance on it.
 
And was it about bashing Christianity? In a way. Sure. I'm not christian and I do believe it's a bit silly. There are many threads regarding this issue, yet you are focusing on mine.
Well, I made the mistake of reading your OP and seeing the Communistic BS in it. So, it made me want to check back to see how you were going to extricate yourself from it. :p :)

Now I have engaged myself in 2 pages of defending myself on views you assume I have.
No, you spent 2 pages playing dodgeball, instead of just answering people's questions.

You would be a perfect candidate for Obama's precrime unit.
:rolleyes:
Yeah, it's pretty horrible that I asked you a question.
 
Back
Top