O'Keefe does the Pentagon

[Swordsmyth]

BREAKING INSIDE THE PENTAGON: Associate Director in the Office of the Secretary of Defense says, “Why not just have an open border?” “Tear down the wall.”

“I think we should repeal the Second Amendment and take the guns all away!” says Jason Beck, who has a classified security clearance and works for the Department of Defense. Beck, who uses a fake name Aiden Grey in his meetings with a disguised James O’Keefe, describes his extremist policies, including “mobilizing the national guard” to confiscate guns from people’s homes. Beck says he wants a “monopoly on state violence,” a concept he describes as “‘We {the government), are the only ones with guns.”

Jason Beck works in Total Force Requirements & Sourcing Policy in the Office of @SecDef Lloyd Austin. This office oversees the @DeptofDefense and acts as the principal defense policy maker and adviser to the President of the United States. Beck says he helps “writes answers for testimony” of “the department’s senior leadership – basically they go over to the Hill for hearings on the department’s posture.”

In this shocking footage we get an INSIDE look as Jason Beck tells James O'Keefe, “we need to pack the Supreme court,” ban the United States Senate, and abolish the electoral college. He also discusses his “bottom surgery’ being painful and the changes to his plumbing.

FULL STORY BELOW

https://twitter.com/JamesOKeefeIII/status/1768009862963728480

 

[susano]

"I had bottom surgery".

 

[A Son of Liberty]

The US is, for all intents and purposes, a failed state at this point (well, it has been since at least 1861, but that's a whole other history discussion)... the constitution, which in my opinion is a passable governing document, especially in consideration of the first 10 amendments, should be the minimum standard by which all employees of the state are held - if employees hold views which are in obvious and direct contravention of the governing document of the regime, that person should not be allowed to hold office. Full stop. It is not up to bureaucrats like this creature to decide whether or not the American people have a protected right that is literally in black and white on said governing document. He is free to have that (poorly held) opinion, but he should not be an employee of the state and to operate explicitly with an opinion which directly contravenes the governing document of the state.

It would be an upgrade if the US government (and I know they would never do this. It's far too late for that) made it not just a requirement that employees "swear to protect and uphold" the constitution of the United States, but made it an automatically disqualifying offense to hold positions that are contrary to the constitution, and those people should be IMMEDIATELY dismissed from whatever position or office they're holding. The governing document provides methods for changing articles, etc. Unless and until those methods have been enacted, there is no reason that a person should work for the US government who holds views, opinions, etc, that contravene the document which gives direction to the way the state may act. This is just basic - if one owned an oil and gas company with the explicit purpose of operating in the oil and gas industry, it would laughably absurd to employ someone who was actively trying to end oil and gas production. You would hire people who are aligned with your intentions. Those people who hold contrary views should be free to organize and make efforts to upend our systems, done in accordance with the current operating document. Period.

Otherwise, it's nothing less that a hole in the chicken fence, and the foxes have been having their way.

And I'm quite aware that it's far too late for anything like this, which is why I'm an advocate of separation. There needs to be a bastion of freedom on this planet, or we'll never retain freedom for human beings. It has to live in real-time somewhere on the planet, or it will be forgotten as some ancient relic that's no longer applicable to human civilization. And of course once it is lost, it will be a hard and bloody fight to regain.

 

[Occam's Banana]

The US is, for all intents and purposes, a failed state at this point (well, it has been since at least 1861, but that's a whole other history discussion)... the constitution, which in my opinion is a passable governing document, especially in consideration of the first 10 amendments, should be the minimum standard by which all employees of the state are held - if employees hold views which are in obvious and direct contravention of the governing document of the regime, that person should not be allowed to hold office. Full stop. It is not up to bureaucrats like this creature to decide whether or not the American people have a protected right that is literally in black and white on said governing document. He is free to have that (poorly held) opinion, but he should not be an employee of the state and to operate explicitly with an opinion which directly contravenes the governing document of the state.

It would be an upgrade if the US government (and I know they would never do this. It's far too late for that) made it not just a requirement that employees "swear to protect and uphold" the constitution of the United States, but made it an automatically disqualifying offense to hold positions that are contrary to the constitution, and those people should be IMMEDIATELY dismissed from whatever position or office they're holding. The governing document provides methods for changing articles, etc. Unless and until those methods have been enacted, there is no reason that a person should work for the US government who holds views, opinions, etc, that contravene the document which gives direction to the way the state may act. This is just basic - if one owned an oil and gas company with the explicit purpose of operating in the oil and gas industry, it would laughably absurd to employ someone who was actively trying to end oil and gas production. You would hire people who are aligned with your intentions. Those people who hold contrary views should be free to organize and make efforts to upend our systems, done in accordance with the current operating document. Period.

Otherwise, it's nothing less that a hole in the chicken fence, and the foxes have been having their way.

And I'm quite aware that it's far too late for anything like this, which is why I'm an advocate of separation. There needs to be a bastion of freedom on this planet, or we'll never retain freedom for human beings. It has to live in real-time somewhere on the planet, or it will be forgotten as some ancient relic that's no longer applicable to human civilization. And of course once it is lost, it will be a hard and bloody fight to regain.

Aside from minor quibbles (such as with "the constitution [being] a passable governing document"), I heartily agree with and endorse all of the above (especially the bolded bits):

Impeachments and removals from office should not need to be predicated upon the commission of criminal acts. Politicians and government bureaucrats are not entitled to their offices, and none of them have any right to not be figuratively defenestrated.

The commies and gun-grabbers and other would-be rights-violators should all be unceremoniously tossed out on their asses immediately upon detection of their presence - and for no other reason than that they are commies or gun-grabbers or would-be rights-violators. (And then they can be prosecuted for any criminal acts they might have committed.)

I have no problem with the idea of tryannizing the government. The government should be tyrannized.

And when it comes to booting out commies, gun grabbers, etc., if some false positives end up getting the boot along with the true positives, then that's fine, too. Again, politicians and government bureaucrats are not entitled to their offices, and no one's rights would be violated by denying them those positions, whatever the reasons (good or bad).

 

[unknown]

What in the actual fuck.

The most shocking part is that this mutant actually suggested repealing the Second instead of just ignoring it.

I'm so tired of American men who do nothing but complain online.

And even more tired of other American men who are willing to follow any and all orders.

 

[Anti Globalist]

Another win for the conspiracy theorists. Love it when these cretins say the quiet part out loud.