February 29th
Just tie a hell of a one on at a going away party on XMAS eve... then sleep it off on XMAS day.
I like the way you think and then you get presents when you get out.
February 29th
Just tie a hell of a one on at a going away party on XMAS eve... then sleep it off on XMAS day.
Yes, in logic, with a statement like A := B and C, A is true only when B is true and C is true, otherwise A is false. But I don't think it works that way in ordinary English language, because it's not preceded by the word "both." If I say, "this basket has red and green apples," does that necessarily mean there's both red and green coloring to each individual apple in that basket? You're wormguy, so you ought to know apples.![]()
"With the cost of prisons rising in Ohio, this really is an alternative and effective form of sentencing," Holbrook said
She has 15 years over her head.Well, SCOTUS could take this, and I would tend to agree that prolonging punishments could qualify as cruel and/or unusual.
I think I'd prefer spending 5 days in jail spread out over 5 years than 1 year solid. Even if those 5 days were on Christmas.
She has 15 years over her head.
This woman should be jumping for joy she isn't in penitentiary green. To be clear, I haven't read about her case nor do I much care to but let's be realistic... The judge threw her a bone. Five days? It may be unusual with the current system of trivially throwing someone into a cage for years but really? This isn't cruel, it is un-cruel. (I understand the points OB and ND have made about the term "cruel and unusual")
They could have given her a few lashes instead. It would have worked alot better.
See, you'd prefer the judge to resign on principle. That's well and fine. The person who replaces him would have given her ass five to seven years in a state prison. You don't seem to get that. The judge did the woman a favor. (aside for the 15 years over her head)Totally, but if you're "Spreading out" a prison term that's just proof that it is simply kidnapping rather than a real attempt to protect society. Locking someone in a cage isn't valid as a form of punishment for anything other than maybe kidnapping, it isn't proportional for anything else.
Non-violent drug offenders routinely get years. They don't deserve it. Would you acknowledge that instead of getting the mandatory minimum sentencing to five or so years, that it'd be better if they got one day every year they had to take off? Not even a work day too - A damn holiday. Their job probably is still intact, their life minimally derailed... are you kidding me? Wait until you see football numbers (50, 60, 100 years) for non-violent drug offenses. Talk to me then about how cruel five days over five years is.Its cruel because it recognizes that the person does not need to be incarcerated for the protection of society, and then throws them in jail anyway.
A subject for another discussion. It is a crime. Whether it should be or not hardly plays a bearing. (to the topic of cruel and unusual punishment)Making fake drivers licenses shouldn't be a crime either, so she doesn't deserve any punishment.
The judge should be commended on not wasting a quarter million dollars to lock the woman up.Judge is an accessory to kidnapping and should be punished accordingly.
My pick: Valentines day, then I have a good excuse to be alone on that day.
See, you'd prefer the judge to resign on principle. That's well and fine. The person who replaces him would have given her ass five to seven years in a state prison. You don't seem to get that. The judge did the woman a favor. (aside for the 15 years over her head)
Non-violent drug offenders routinely get years. They don't deserve it. Would you acknowledge that instead of getting the mandatory minimum sentencing to five or so years, that it'd be better if they got one day every year they had to take off? Not even a work day too - A damn holiday. Their job probably is still intact, their life minimally derailed... are you kidding me? Wait until you see football numbers (50, 60, 100 years) for non-violent drug offenses. Talk to me then about how cruel five days over five years is.
A subject for another discussion. It is a crime. Whether it should be or not hardly plays a bearing. (to the topic of cruel and unusual punishment)
I feel worse for the 15 years over her head, which truth be told she will probably violate and get, than I do for the five Christmas days. Christmas is the best day to be in on. She gets a special meal and the guards aren't going to be assholes towards her. Watch tv late and eat more than a damn apple and bagel for breakfast. Sounds wicked. Tell you what, have her go get a prescription they hand out like candy from her doctor for trazodone or Ambien . She'll sleep through that day. You could sleep through it anyways.
The judge should be commended on not wasting a quarter million dollars to lock the woman up.
Stupid reality always gets in the way of my plans, well no battle plan survives to the first contact with the enemy.Or you'll be caged with a towering, muscular, lovesick inmate...
"I've been doing this for nine years now," Holbrook told ABC News. "I take some date that is important to the individual and make them give it up. For example, if they celebrate Christmas, I would make them go to jail for three to five days during the Christmas holiday so they miss Christmas Eve and Christmas Day with their families."
Unusual punishments are unconstitutional.