Heather in WI
Member
- Joined
- Nov 5, 2007
- Messages
- 402
Bolded my inputs...
Fantastic. I absolutely needed this kind of input! I'm using this to change our latest version.
~Heather
Bolded my inputs...
Do not use collude, subvert, and abrogate if you want to reach the average voter.
The rule is to write at a 6-8th-grade level for a mass audience.
http://hawks4ronpaul.blogspot.com/
In my state MN anyone can write a resolution and present it at caucus. We had one presented about immigration.
It would be a good idea that a form letter resolution get writen and posted here and that these get presented at all caucus states? This would for sure put a damper on all those at the caucus voting for McInsane...
![]()
I can agree with your point on abrogate, but collude and subvert are words well known enough to be used, and they are much stronger than what was used.
I think we've got it! Here's version 2.0:
-----------------------------------------------------------
WHEREAS, the Republican Party is founded upon the conservative political philosophy derived from the principle that individuals are endowed not by the government, but by the Creator, with certain unalienable rights, and----------------------------------------------------------
WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States is designed to guarantee unfettered exercise of those rights by strictly limiting the power of government, whose authority is derived only from the consent of the governed, and
WHEREAS, the Principles of Conservatism promote Liberty, Prosperity and Individual Freedom, and
WHEREAS, the leading presidential candidate for the Republican Party, Senator John McCain, has consistently demonstrated a record of public service counter to the philosophy and principles of conservatism and the Republican Party. To prove this, let these facts be submitted:
1. He has broken with the Republican Party in strongly opposing President Bush's tax cuts in 2001 and 2003. He also joined (use liberals' names for effect?)leading liberal senators in offering and voting for amendments designed to undermine the tax cuts.
2. He has worked against Conservative principles, undermining the First Amendment by abridging the free speech of citizens partaking in the political process.
3. He has worked against the principles of the Republican Party, greatly expanding federal regulatory authority in order to combat global warming in ways that would greatly burden the American economy, contrary to free market forces.
4. He has worked against the Republican Party to make a mockery of the rule of law, promoting amnesty for 20 million illegal immigrants.
5. He has fought the Republican Party to create the Patient’s Bill of Rights, which allowed the government to impose a set of onerous mandates on insurance coverage.
6. He has undermined the principles of a free market economy by voting for an amendment that would authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to set prices on prescription drugs under Medicare.
7. He has voted to subvert American Sovereignty by granting consulting rights to Mexico concerning the erection of a southern border fence.
8. He has a consistent pattern of shocking verbal abuse, including screaming profanities, against Senate Republican colleagues who oppose his bills in any way.
9. He has exercised scandalously poor judgment by intervening with the federal regulators on behalf of Keating in the Savings and Loan Crisis of the 1980s.
10. He sponsored and voted for a 282% tax increase on cigarettes that would have unconstitutionally violated the First Amendment and increased the size of the federal bureaucracy exponentially by giving the FDA unrestricted control over nicotine.
11. He supports raising Social Security taxes.
12. He has undermined the Constitution and opposed the Constitutional duties of the vice president to break a tie on judicial nominations.
13. He has consistently led efforts undermining Second Amendment rights by promoting bills which regulate all sales at gun shows; which force gun-owners to purchase trigger locks making their firearms useless for self-defense; which restrict the legitimate transfer of firearms over the internet; and which extend the restrictions of the Brady bill to pawn shops and gun repair shops.
14. He has voted to use taxpayer funds to harvest stem cells from human embryos.
15. He has refused to take immediate and direct action to protect the life of the unborn; he opposes the repeal of Roe v. Wade; and he opposes a constitutional amendment to protect all human life.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Republican Party of the xxxxxx opposes any effort to promote, support, or endorse Senator John McCain as the Republican nominee, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Republican Party of the xxxxxx will only support candidates who promote the philosophy and principles of conservatism in government; who promote smaller government, fiscal discipline, and greater economic and personal freedoms; and who have consistently demonstrated a record of public service as evidence of their principled beliefs.
I love it now!
Anything else to change? We have until Monday.
I think we've got it! Here's version 2.0:
-----------------------------------------------------------
WHEREAS, the Republican Party is founded upon the conservative political philosophy derived from the principle that individuals are endowed not by the government, but by the Creator, with certain unalienable rights, and
WHEREAS, the Constitution of the United States is designed to guarantee the unfettered exercise of those rights by strictly limiting the power of government, whose authority is derived only from the consent of the governed, and
WHEREAS, the Principles of Conservatism promote Liberty, Prosperity and Individual Freedom, and
WHEREAS, the leading presidential candidate for the Republican Party, Senator John McCain, has consistently demonstrated a record of public service counter to the philosophy and principles of conservatism and the Republican Party. To prove this, let these facts be submitted:
1. He has broken with the Republican Party in strongly opposing President Bush's tax cuts in 2001 and 2003. He also joined leading liberal senators in offering and voting for amendments designed to undermine the tax cuts.
2. He has worked against Conservative principles, undermining the First Amendment by abridging the free speech of citizens partaking in the political process.
3. He has worked against the principles of the Republican Party, greatly expanding federal regulatory authority in order to combat global warming in ways that would greatly burden the American economy, contrary to free market forces.
4. He has worked against the Republican Party to make a mockery of the rule of law, promoting amnesty for 20 million illegal immigrants.
5. He has fought the Republican Party to create the Patient’s Bill of Rights, which allowed the government to impose a set of onerous mandates on insurance coverage.
6. He has undermined the principles of a free market economy by voting for an amendment that would authorize the Secretary of Health and Human Services to implement price controls on prescription drugs under Medicare.
7. He has voted to subvert American Sovereignty by granting consulting rights to Mexico concerning the erection of a southern border fence.
8. He has a consistent pattern of shocking verbal abuse, including screaming profanities, against Senate Republican colleagues who oppose his bills in any way.
9. He has exercised scandalously poor judgment by intervening with the federal regulators on behalf of Keating in the Savings and Loan Crisis of the 1980s.
10. He sponsored and voted for a 282% tax increase on cigarettes that would have unconstitutionally violated the First Amendment and increased the size of the federal bureaucracy exponentially by giving the FDA unrestricted control over nicotine.
11. He supports raising Social Security taxes.
12. He has undermined the Constitution and opposed the Constitutional duties of the Vice President to break a tie on judicial nominations.
13. He has consistently led efforts undermining Second Amendment rights by promoting bills which regulate all sales at gun shows; which force gun-owners to purchase trigger locks making their firearms useless for self-defense; which restrict the legitimate transfer of firearms over the internet; and which extend the restrictions of the Brady bill to pawn shops and gun repair shops.
14. He has voted to use taxpayer funds to harvest stem cells from human embryos.
15. He has refused to take immediate and direct action to protect the life of the unborn; he opposes the repeal of Roe v. Wade; and he opposes a constitutional amendment to protect all human life.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Republican Party of the xxxxxx opposes any effort to promote, support, or endorse Senator John McCain as the Republican nominee, and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Republican Party of the xxxxxx will only support candidates who promote the philosophy and principles of conservatism in government; who promote smaller government, fiscal discipline, and greater economic and personal freedoms; and who have consistently demonstrated a record of public service as evidence of their principled beliefs.
I think we've got it! Here's version 2.0:
Anything else to change? We have until Monday.
America Says No To John McCain
Conservatives say no to John McCain...
John McCain voted to reward up to 6 million illegal aliens with amnesty (2007)
John McCain Voted YES on comprehensive immigration reform. (Jun 2007), Joining Ted Kennedy, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi and other liberals on amnesty just last year!
John McCain Voted YES on allowing illegal aliens to participate in Social Security. (May 2006)
John McCain Voted YES on giving Guest Workers a path to citizenship. (May 2006)
John McCain Voted YES on allowing more foreign workers into the US for farm work. (Jul 1998)
John McCain should change his campaign slogan from "No Surrender" to "No Surrender - Except for Amnesty, The Second Amendment or Supporting the Constitution" OR "I John McCain Sold Out The American People, in favor of Illegal Aliens..."
Depending on what exactly they want I would stick with fewer specific examples that are more generic and don't require a lot of details. Just call them Democrats instead of naming names; not everyone knows those names. Things like verbal abuse don't necessarily make him a bad conservative.
This is why I wrote mine the way I did, anyway. But use whatever they'll sign, the principle is what counts.
d03boy;1223591 does unalienable mean inalienable? i wonder what the difference is..[/QUOTE said: