OH - Haitian migrants eating cats?

Ya you have TDS because you can never admit that Trump did something good. Pretty sure jmdrake has.

Even TDS sufferers might reluctantly admit he did something good, but then come back with "but he's a nazi and wants to destroy muh democracy!!"

I'm old enough to have lived through every presidency back to LBJ, and actually have enough long term memory to recall them back through Nixon. Trump was the worst president to date during his term.

You want me to pin a merit badge on him every time he fails to embarrass the nation while addressing the G7? No. Screw you. I'm just not the cultist you are. Biden may have lowered your expectations, but not mine. So far he didn't measure up to Jerry Ford.
 
I'm old enough to have lived through every presidency back to LBJ, and actually have enough long term memory to recall them back through Nixon. Trump was the worst president to date during his term.

You want me to pin a merit badge on him every time he fails to embarrass the nation while addressing the G7? No. Screw you. I'm just not the cultist you are. Biden may have lowered your expectations, but not mine. So far he didn't measure up to Jerry Ford.

lol yeah no.
 
GY7dWQzXkAAWXI_
 
What if none of that is true and they're lying to you?

Is it your contention that Walz never signed such a law that repealed, I'm assuming, mandatory medical care for babies born alive after a failed induced abortion?

Or that no babies died on the table because of it?

Should be easy enough to prove one way or the other.
 
Is it your contention that Walz never signed such a law that repealed, I'm assuming, mandatory medical care for babies born alive after a failed induced abortion?

Or that no babies died on the table because of it?

Should be easy enough to prove one way or the other.

Here's the new bill:

145.423 RECOGNITION OF INFANT WHO IS BORN ALIVE.

Subdivision 1.Recognition; care.

An infant who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to care for the infant who is born alive.

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/statutes/cite/145.423
 
Last edited:

I'm not sure if it was your intention, but what you posted basically confirms what AF has been saying. Namely, that Walz repealed the provisions that required medical care be provided to failed abortion babies.

The law originally stated that medical care would be provided to these babies, and then provided the subsections necessary to implement that.

What's really kind of sick about it though, is that they didn't choose to repeal the whole thing. As you quoted in your post, they left the header of that section mostly intact. What they did, was they repealed every subsection (e.g., the important bits that implemented the law), and then changed the phrase "medical care" in the header to just "care".

They repealed all the important bits of that section, and left in place a warm & fuzzy header that was neutered of all usefulness.
 
Ah good, I'm glad to see it has been changed.

I'm not sure if anything good was about it... as far as I can tell the entire section was repealed except the header. (linked in his post)

This is an old version of the law: (ignore the strike marks, not relevant to the recent repeals)

https://www.revisor.mn.gov/laws/2015/0/71/#laws.8.44.0

Subdivisions 2-9 were all repealed.

Subdivion 1 was amended as below:

Subdivision 1. Recognition; medical care. A born alive An infant as a result of an abortion who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant care for the infant who is born alive.
 
Last edited:
Subdivision 1. Recognition; medical care. A born alive An infant as a result of an abortion who is born alive shall be fully recognized as a human person, and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken by the responsible medical personnel to preserve the life and health of the born alive infant care for the infant who is born alive.

You're upset that the statute was expanded to apply to all infants? Are there some children that you think should not be provided protection under the law and good medical practice?
 
Incorrect..

People with TDS can't think straight when it comes to any subject that is related to Trump. They will do all sorts of mental gymnastics to make sure they fit within the media narrative.

By your own definition you have TDS. For example, thinking the reason there was no case number for the fake court document posted on X and then cited by the New American was missing because the court document was "sealed" when that is the opposite of how sealing court cases works! You can find the case number, just not hte contents. If the contents of the document got "leaked" there's no way in hell the case number wouldn't be leaked too. But you defended that obvious lie with mental gymnastics. And I'm 100% certain you've accused me of TDS. My accurately quoting Trump's disinfectant comment, which even Trump didn't try to defend except by saying he was being sarcastic is an example of you falsely accusing me of having TDS. You did you own mental gymnastics on that story in a way even Trump didn't try to defend and you falsely accused others of having TDS. Clearly you have the TDS.

I don't think I accused you of having TDS, did I? Maybe.. but I don't think so. You're more borderline TDS. This issue you seem to be obtuse on because you think it is something to do with race.. when a good portion of the best witnesses we have are actually african american.

No. It's not because the story has anything to do with race. The Trump disinfectant story has nothing to do with race. I call out obvious likes. For example, the black woman crying (without tears) hysterically about her dog being beheaded is clearly lying. How do I know this? She has a fvcking cell phone to do the TikTok video, yet she didn't take a picture of her dead dog's head? The black man who did the video of the chickens on the grill and called them cats is clearly lying. When you look at the feet of the skinned checkens you can clearly see where the chicken "hock" ends and the chicken "shank" begins. I've given multiple pictures of skinned cats in this thread, one prepared for disection and a couple prepared for food. None of them have their legs straight up in the air (you falsely claimed that a skinned chicken on a grill would not have its feet straight up in the air and I should you video of a chicken right before the shank was cut off proving you wrong), and the skinned cats have no clear place where you can see the difference between the upper leg (hock on a chicken) and the lower leg. Also the black man never showed who was actually doing the cooking. For all you know it could have been him. The third video is the guy who never said anything abouit cats or dogs and only talked about waterfowl and he later pointed out that he never actually saw that. I think he was just honestly relaying what he heard unlike TikTok woman and JD Vance BBQ man. And why would the other two lie? To go viral! People do that all the damn time. Remember Jussie Smollet? In Alabama last year we had a woman who faked her own kidnapping by being on the phone with her family saying she had stopped on the freeway to help some wandering toddler (what's a toddler doing alone on the freeway?) and then screaming "Help! Someone is trying to grab me!" and then disappearing. She was later prosecuted for filing a false police report. Note the TikTok lady can't be charged with filing a false police report because she didn't file one and if she did she woiuld have taken a picture to file with the police report. I'll let David Chappellle explain this to you.



At 2:00 in "The whole country was up in arms. Was talking about it all the time on the news. And for some reason, African Americans we were like oddly quiet. We were so quiet about the shyt that the gay community started accusing the African American community of being homophobic for not supporting him. What they didn't know is that we were supporting him by our silence. Because we understood that n*gga was clearly lying."

As I pointed out earlier in this thread, I don't attempt to debunk every negative post that [MENTION=3169]Anti Federalist[/MENTION] puts up about black people in the "taking things from White People" thread, because most of them are based in facts. But you spread bvllshyt. It doesn't matter whether it has anything to do with race or not. But when it comes to Trump, you will make up shyt that even Trump wouldn't try to say.
 
Last edited:
You're upset that the statute was expanded to apply to all infants? Are there some children that you think should not be provided protection under the law and good medical practice?

Not to mention, all the other provisions that were repealed

Nice try though :cool:

2729805.jpg
 
Last edited:

Tit for tat. During the pandemic Haiti (which has the lowest COVID rate in the Western Hemisphere), didn't let anyone in from the Dominican Republic.

https://www.voanews.com/a/science-h...n-republic-suspends-most-flights/6185861.html
Haiti Closes Border with Dominican Republic, Suspends Most Flights

Haiti also initially refused to accept the COVID vaccines. And a few months later Haiti's president was assassinate. And one of the asssssins was a U.S. DEA informant.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...phere-without-vaccines?embedded-checkout=true

https://www.haitilibre.com/en/news-...000-doses-of-the-who-astrazeneca-vaccine.html

https://apnews.com/article/haiti-mo...mi-informant-b2f77802a28d6b690935e23e3ddf1b1f

You're focusing on the wrong bioweapon.
 
Ya you have TDS because you can never admit that Trump did something good. Pretty sure jmdrake has.

Even TDS sufferers might reluctantly admit he did something good, but then come back with "but he's a nazi and wants to destroy muh democracy!!"

Of course I've admitted Trump has done some good things. But that hasn't prevented you for accusing me of having TDS when I point out the crazy stuff and the anti liberty stuff. And that's because you have your own form of TDS. (Trump Devotion Syndrome.)
 
This is off topic of this thread, but this is much more important.

This is one reason why there is room in Springfield for 20,000 Haitian bioweapons.

Okay. I know you're making a generalization here. But Tim Walz wasn't the governor of Springfield Ohio. Keep your eye on the ball. You're so close to the truth. Replace the word "abortion" with the word "NAFTA" and you'll understand why there is room in Springfield for 20,000 Hatian people (not bioweapons). Springfield didn't lose 20,000 people because of late term abortion. Springfield lost 20,000 people because the factories closed down and there were no jobs so people naturally went somewhere else for work.

Now let's look at that "bioweapon" claim. It's already been established that white meth addicts in Portland are the ones living like they are in Port au Prince, not the actual not on drugs, and most like not cat eating, Haitians in Springfield Ohio. And I get it. Something should be done to actually help poor white people and poor black people get on their feet. I disagree with [MENTION=40029]PAF[/MENTION] and [MENTION=75029]Invisible Man[/MENTION] on this point. I consider all the downtrodden "my people." We are not each other's enemy. We are being conned by Kamala Harris and Donald Trump and Barack Obama and Bill Clinton and Dick Cheney and "fill-in-the-blank" to believe we are each other's enemy.

Ephesians 6:12
King James Version
12 For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places.


Until you understand ^that you will not truly be able to help "your people." I'm not Hillary Clinton. I don't think you're part of the "deplorables." I don't think the white meth heads in Portland are deplorable. I don't think the hardworking Haitians in Springfield Ohio are deplorable. The main beef of the white Trump supporting welfare recipients in Springfield is "How are these Haitians getting $3,000 on their EBT cards?" Because they aren't using their EBT cards and stacking their money up because they are allowed to collect EBT and work at the same time. My dad own rental houses. One of the renters is behind now because his wife's disability check got cut off because she was found to be working. (I didn't even know she was getting one). I get it. The federal government is not the best instrument for helping the poor. But it is a problem when it helps poor people around the world in a way that it doesn't help people right here in the U.S. What's the solution? I've talked about Tangelo Park Florida until I'm blue in the face but nobody seems to care. Private people could make a difference. I wonder how many people in Portland living in their RVs would be willing to relocate to that town in the video I posted where the sawmill is closing for lack of labor because the housing prices have outpaced the salaries at the mill? Nobody thought "we could set aside a few acres of land as an RV park with solar sewage hookups and clean water and maybe some solar panels and have a labor force?" And I'm just throwing that idea out there. You are correct in that the downtrodden have to believe in themselves again. The Promise Keeper movement was all about that but sadly it died out for reasons I don't know.
 
Back
Top