*****Official Super Tuesday results thread*****

helmuth_hubener said:
They are Fox News viewers, and they are basing their votes on the coverage Fox News has been having on Santorum.

Seriously, that's who they are, and that's why they do it. I've talked to them.
Click to expand...

exactly. they are 50+ fox news viewers. we just have to wait for them to die off.
 
ONUV said:
if the only choice is a candidate who will vote against obama vs a candidate who will vote with obama, how can you not vote for the former? unless, you don't vote at all.
Click to expand...

Who said those are the only choices? You? What are you having for dinner tomorrow night, dog shit or cat shit?
 
Lol Mitt gets 70 something percent in ID, yet less in VA, where pretty much all the vile gov institutions like Langley are, and defense/data mining contractors as well? Yea, sure :rolleyes: Something just so not right with that.
 
Student Of Paulism said:
Lol Mitt gets 70 something percent in ID, yet less in VA, where pretty much all the vile gov institutions like Langley are, and defense/data mining contractors as well? Yea, sure :rolleyes: Something just so not right with that.
Click to expand...
It's because of the format of the caucus in Iowa. They eliminate all but the top two candidates and re-vote if no candidate takes more than 50% in a county.
 
The Gold Standard said:
Who said those are the only choices? You? What are you having for dinner tomorrow night, dog shit or cat shit?
Click to expand...

i said if those are the only choices. it will come down to that in a lot of elections. there won't always be a pro-liberty candidate to vote for.
 
March 10th is another caucus in Kansas which will probably go Santorum and then 3 of the U.S. territories which are delegates as Paul can use them.
 
95% reporting and we're still in third in Alaska. We'll get some bound delegates out of Alaska, though. It looks like 6 right now.
 
At least in Alaska we got 3,000, which is probably near to the total number of people that came to the two rallies. 1,000 each, I think, at Fairbanks and Anchorage, and many of them were probably not RP supporters but participants in an interesting and historic event. So we did as well as could possibly have been expected in Alaska, I think. There's probably only a few hundred RP donors in the whole state of Alaska. Every hard-core Ron Paul supporter probably got multiple others out to the caucuses with him.

Good job Alaska. Just a couple thousand more people and we'd have totally dominated in a landslide -- actually, an avalanche let's say. Next time.....
 
Please read the vote "flipping" thread. Participate if you can. Vote flipping is the only way to explain these results in states like AK, ND. Spend the time to get familiar with statistics and help out analyze the data.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...vidence-of-Algorithmic-vote-flipping./page125

I've done enough statistics in my career to know that serious, undeniable shenanigans were happening in IA, NH and SC at least. Those statistical violations were not happening pre-2008 and that has been demonstrated unquestionably.

Please don't get hung up on "absolute proof". You won't get that with statistics. We do show converging evidence in multiple states, multiple counties beyond a reasonable doubt. There are people stating unreasonable doubt in the vote flipping thread. Please ignore them so we can progress with this analysis.

If you don't have the math knowledge to do statistics, seek the help from those that can. If CNN can declare Romney a winner with 2% of the vote, that's fine actually. That's statistics and I'm OK with that. On the other hand, we have demonstrated what appears to be fraud to 99.9999999992340% (or better) in multiple cases. It's not 100%, but that's political statistics. That's how it is.

So, please contribute your time what ever way you can. Help provide links to vote data for all the counties in all 10 Super Tuesday states + WA, MI, so the experts can analyze.

For example: Norfolk Virginia:
http://www.norfolk.gov/elections/12results/3_06.htm (need to convert that to Excel)
 
Doesnt it make sense that a President should have some military experience? Either from being a frontline infantryman, to being a navy seal, to being a cook in the navy... As president, you control the military... Seems these chickenhawks are unqualified for the job and have no miltiary experience... besidse being a army brat and serving on some arms committee.

Also, yeah.. vote flipping would be interesting to read about. I hope you guys are onto something good XD..
 
RonRules said:
Please read the vote "flipping" thread. Participate if you can. Vote flipping is the only way to explain these results in states like AK, ND. Spend the time to get familiar with statistics and help out analyze the data.
http://www.ronpaulforums.com/showth...vidence-of-Algorithmic-vote-flipping./page125

I've done enough statistics in my career to know that serious, undeniable shenanigans were happening in IA, NH and SC at least. Those statistical violations were not happening pre-2008 and that has been demonstrated unquestionably.

Please don't get hung up on "absolute proof". You won't get that with statistics. We do show converging evidence in multiple states, multiple counties beyond a reasonable doubt. There are people stating unreasonable doubt in the vote flipping thread. Please ignore them so we can progress with this analysis.

If you don't have the math knowledge to do statistics, seek the help from those that can. If CNN can declare Romney a winner with 2% of the vote, that's fine actually. That's statistics and I'm OK with that. On the other hand, we have demonstrated what appears to be fraud to 99.9999999992340% (or better) in multiple cases. It's not 100%, but that's political statistics. That's how it is.

So, please contribute your time what ever way you can. Help provide links to vote data for all the counties in all 10 Super Tuesday states + WA, MI, so the experts can analyze.

For example: Norfolk Virginia:
http://www.norfolk.gov/elections/12results/3_06.htm (need to convert that to Excel)
Click to expand...

Bump. I don't post in the thread, but you guys have some very compelling stuff there!
 
kombayn said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_Samoa_Republican_caucuses,_2008

Check it out, John McCain won the caucus by recording a message to the voters and sending it over the internet. I think Ron should do it, all the delegates help.
Click to expand...
Not a bad idea and you can never do enough campaigning, but the Corporate Main Stream Media choose Juan McCain and forced him down the throats of TV viewing American Zombies. It's the media and the most ignorant and highest precentile voting groups ages (50-64 & 65+) that follow like sheep.
 
Last edited:
Truly a disgrace. After 10 years of service in the Army and multiple Iraq deployments, I can honestly say I wasted my time. This country has no honor, no sense of identity, no clue what liberty is. Sorry to be the one to tell you all, but America is done. The founders would not have quit, no, they would have left and started their own nation! Too bad there is no land left in this world.

I am ashamed of this country and the traitors that occupy it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Anti Federalist
SC to become 29th Constitutional Carry state in the nation
Replies
11
Views
834
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
FL-DeSantis signs bill, making Florida the 26th Constitutional Carry state in the country
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
The oficially **official** "Super Tuesday" thread (05 March 2024)
2
Replies
28
Views
2K
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Anti Federalist
Nebraska becomes 27th Constitutional Carry state
Replies
2
Views
279
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
Anti Federalist
South Carolina on Track to Become 27th Constitutional Carry State
Replies
1
Views
193
Occam's Banana
Occam's Banana
Back
Top