Official NV GOP Results coming in

I'm not sure exactly what is meant by "Long Cat". I certainly don't want Ron Paul supporters to NOT vote as is advised at LewRockwell.com If Ron Paul supporters don't vote, they are going to be in a world of hurt.
Just messing with you. If you look up long cat on google you'll see it's a meme that's based on a cat being so long that it destroys a thread cause no one wants to continue reading.

Like I said thought I was messing with you. Your info was great.
 
Half of those 22K (which frankly is the maximum I'd expect, based on what I've seen so far) would give us about 25% overall. Apparently getting our pledged/ID'd supporters to the caucus at 9AM on a Saturday is hard.

you have to understand that a lot of those ID's probably came when Ron was polling really well in Iowa and he had a lot of momentum and we got some soft yes's. Now that the momentum has went dry it will be much more difficult to get those people to the caucus.
 
CNN apparently is doing actual reporting. It's not that hard if you have people at the caucuses phoning in the results. They had 8% reporting when everyone else had 4%.

Now MSNBC just showed a screen with Ron Paul at 30% and Romney at 38%. Looks like they are using the official results.

CNN still at 8% with their own numbers. Maybe they're just making stuff up.

if you go look at the CNN poll page you will see that you are wrong. they are reporting different numbers as the 100% counties then the Official GOP
 
CNN has actual reporters on scene to get the raw results caucus to caucus. That's why the have more numbers than the GOP is putting out right now. (Why does it take 3 hours to tally votes anyways?)
 
if you go look at the CNN poll page you will see that you are wrong. they are reporting different numbers as the 100% counties then the Official GOP

Even the %'s of total voters are WAY different. CNN's 8% of the total vote is about 4x the 4% of the Nevada GOP. These are huge disparities.
 
Because the numbers make no sense.

Check out the numbers from http://www.nvgopcaucus.com/results and www.cnn.com. CNN has 6% in and NVGOP has 4% in. CNN says Romney has 3510 votes with 8% of the vote in. NVGOP has Romney with 795 with 4% of the vote in. Something fishy?

No. CNN is using their own numbers from sources they have and caucuses they attended. When both report the same areas, they have matched up.
 
No. CNN is using their own numbers from sources they have and caucuses they attended. When both report the same areas, they have matched up.

Even the %'s of total voters are WAY different. CNN's 8% of the total vote is about 4x the 4% of the Nevada GOP. These are huge disparities.

...
 
I'm concerned with what I see, and it seems as if 3rd is almost a lock for us, not 2nd.

Although the actual vote totals are small in the early counties, Newt Gingrich appears to be a strong '2nd place poller' than McCain was in 2008.

Churchill, Perching, Eureka, and Mineral counties all show Newt doing better than McCain did/ In Churchill and Pershing Paul actually got fewer votes than in 2008, how is that even possible? These two small counties might be the first proof ever of a 'former Ron Paul supporter'.

Granted, there will be single firehouses in Clark county with more voters than some of these entire counties, but still I think it's telling how Gingrich the slime is using his arrogance to pull in votes.

Newt can;t possibly beat Obama, even Newt knows that. Yet because he talks tough and acts confident (blindly confident) he does better than us because we talk about 'a movement' and 'a message' and 'having a delegate impact for the convention'.

Paul should have left that 2008 talk back in 2008. He's shooting himself, and us donors, in the foot.
 
Nevada Caucus
February 4, 2012
4.6% reporting (85/1835)
This page updates automatically
Cycle Candidates

All Candidates

Romney
36.8%
848

Paul
29.5%
679

Gingrich
20.2%
465

Santorum
13.3%
307
 
Back
Top