Officer cleared after shooting an entire litter of kittens to death in front of children

sailingaway

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
72,103
AF leaves the kitten shooting stories underserved...

wkyc_kittens_130612a-615x345.jpg


A police department in Ohio on Tuesday defended a humane officer who shot and killed a litter of feral kittens and told nearby children that the animals would be going to “kitty heaven.”

An executive with the Ohio Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals told the Sun News that Humane Officer Barry Accorti had responded to a complaint from a Vista Lake Way homeowner on Monday about a litter of kittens living in her woodpile.

“He informed her that shelters were full and that these cats would be going to kitty heaven,” Ohio SPCA Executive Director Teresa Landon explained to the paper. “She assumed he would be trapping them or something and taking them to a shelter and they would be humanely euthanized if they were not adopted.”

“Instead, he went to his truck and got a gun, which she thought was a tranquilizer gun, and walked around to the back of the house and approximately 15 feet from her back door shot and killed the 8- to 10-week-old kittens.”

Landon said the officer began shooting the animals in front of the homeowner and within in range of her young children.

“Her children were upstairs in view of the windows. They started screaming and crying because they heard the gunshots. They started screaming, ‘Mommy, he’s killing the kittens,’” Landon noted. “It’s heartbreaking… There is no excuse for it. It’s absolutely shameful that someone with the title of humane officer would do this.”

The SPCA called for Accorti to be fired, but North Ridgeville Police Department Chief Mike Freeman released a statement defending his actions.

“The cats were located within the wood pile and euthanized,” Freeman wrote. “The cats were removed from the wood pile and taken from the residence.”

The police chief added:

The complainant urged better communication in the future. NRPD recognizes the concerns of those who believe feral cats should not be killed for simply trying to survive but also acknowledges other research that recognizes the risks associated with these animals and the need to manage feral cats. Research and other animal organizations accept shooting as an acceptable means of euthanasia.

After visiting the scene, talking with the responding officer and re-interviewing the complainant, I have decided his actions were appropriate and have decided not to impose any disciplinary measures for the incident. We will talk with the humane officers about improving their communications with the public. We are here to help those who seek our assistance. Our agency prides itself on not telling people, “It’s not our problem or there is nothing we can do for you.” This would be the easy way out. To walk away and leave a safety issue unresolved is irresponsible. At no time does this agency condone or allow the indiscriminate killing of animals, but we will continue to assist residents when there is a safety or nuisance condition.

The North Ridgeville Police Department said it was forced to take down its Facebook page for hours on Monday due to “overwhelming abuse.”

See more, and video at link: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/06/...-shooting-litter-of-kittens-in-front-of-kids/
 
" To walk away and leave a safety issue unresolved is irresponsible. "


Thank Goodness the officer was their to make those kids safer, we know what a serious danger 8 week old kittens can be.


Quick! Grab your gun! Look what we found! SAVE THE CHILDREN!!!

1182788482feral-kittens.jpg
 
Last edited:
Another symptom of the moral decline of society.

The disease that manifests symptoms such as this is too much government.
 
Another symptom of the moral decline of society.

The disease that manifests symptoms such as this is too much government.


Yes. How did things become so twisted that a government official can take a gun and shoot the brains out of trapped baby kittens in front of children, and the government affirms properly protocol was followed?

It appears the government becomes so big that common sense and normal values of good and bad cease to exist.
 
Are people mad because it was in front of the children? Out in the open? With a gun?
or
Are people mad because the cats were killed?

I love cats. I own a cat. But if the shelters are over-populated, they most likely would have been given a lethal injection anyway. What's the difference between that and the way the officer did it?

It was misuse of a gun; it shouldn't have been in front of the children; but the end result would likely be the same.

(I'm expecting neg reps, but this is one of those times I feel like a robot trying to understand humans, please don't be cross)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tod
Are people mad because it was in front of the children? Out in the open? With a gun?
or
Are people mad because the cats were killed?

I love cats. I own a cat. But if the shelters are over-populated, they most likely would have been given a lethal injection anyway. What's the difference between that and the way the officer did it?

It was misuse of a gun; it shouldn't have been in front of the children; but the end result would likely be the same.

(I'm expecting neg reps, but this is one of those times I feel like a robot trying to understand humans, please don't be cross)
Huge difference between legal injection and blowing the brains of kittens out in front of young children as they scream and watch. You have to be pretty insensitive not to realize how much that traumatized those children. Most children are close to nature and do not have the jaded disrespect for life that adults do. So the outrage from me comes from the insensitivity of the officer towards those children and the abuse of power. It seems mocking imo the way he referenced kitty heaven as there appears no forwarning to the family as to the fact the kittens were going to be shot and advice to shield the children from what was to happen. I will leave the robot commentary for someone else to address with you.
 
Last edited:
I hate cats, wouldn't keep one if I were paid.

That said what pisses me off is a government employee shooting any domestic animal that hasn't maimed someone, not one they think might maim, but already has.
 
I hate cats, wouldn't keep one if I were paid.

That said what pisses me off is a government employee shooting any domestic animal that hasn't maimed someone, not one they think might maim, but already has.

In all fairness, they weren't domestic animals. They were feral cats, wild animals.

If he shot rats in the woodpile how would some of you have felt?

They were going to be taken to a shelter and killed anyway. I don't see how a 9mm to the head is any less lethal or instantaneous than an injection.

The guy showed horrible judgement doing this in front of the kids though.

The lady who called obviously wanted them gone, didn't want take care of her problem herself. She learned what happens when you trust the government to do things for you. Tough lesson. Next time she will learn to either take care of them or drive them to a better place and let them go.
 
Are people mad because it was in front of the children? Out in the open? With a gun?
or
Are people mad because the cats were killed?

I love cats. I own a cat. But if the shelters are over-populated, they most likely would have been given a lethal injection anyway. What's the difference between that and the way the officer did it?

It was misuse of a gun; it shouldn't have been in front of the children; but the end result would likely be the same.

(I'm expecting neg reps, but this is one of those times I feel like a robot trying to understand humans, please don't be cross)

Did someone shoot kittens in front of you when you were a kid?
 
Cats, dogs ferrets cows, horses, etc. are domestic animals.

Just because someone deems a domestic animal "feral" or "wild" or even mean shouldn't give a government employee authorization to slaughter that animal.

As to your question of "rats in the woodpile"; Nope, there's absolutely no reason what-so-ever for a government employee to even consider shooting them, waste of taxpayer time and equipment...
 
In all fairness, they weren't domestic animals. They were feral cats, wild animals.

If he shot rats in the woodpile how would some of you have felt?

They were going to be taken to a shelter and killed anyway. I don't see how a 9mm to the head is any less lethal or instantaneous than an injection.

The guy showed horrible judgement doing this in front of the kids though.

The lady who called obviously wanted them gone, didn't want take care of her problem herself. She learned what happens when you trust the government to do things for you. Tough lesson. Next time she will learn to either take care of them or drive them to a better place and let them go.

Some gov't loser with a gun out shooting at rats in my woodpile? Yeah--I'd have a problem with that too. But these kids may have actually been watching these kittens grow up and play, etc. Plus, now there's fucking kitten brains and guts in the woodpile--along with bullets. Not to mention screaming kids, who may have learned that same, very important lesson.
 
Back
Top