Obama Making Good Moves on Cuba, etc

McCain would have done less damage. Am I correct in thinking that?

AAAH!!

You came and ask whether you should amputate my right arm or the left...and started a debate over it...but you never asked my opinion. I want neither of my arms removed.

If I say Pol pot murdered less people than Hirohito, does that mean I am a Pol Pot fan? Or you think it does.

Of course Obama will do more damage and yes Pol Pot murdered less people than Hirohito.

How does this sentence sounds? It may sound like I'm supporting the later only If your mind is tricked to believe that these are the only options available. It's your thinking that is flawed.


edit: Hey hey I just solved your problem, you are infected with the Lesser of the two evils virus.
 
Last edited:
AAAH!!

You came and ask whether you should amputate my right arm or the left...and started a debate over it...but you never asked my opinion. I want neither of my arms removed.

If I say Pol pot murdered less people than Hirohito, does that mean I am a Pol Pot fan? Or you think it does.

Of course Obama will do more damage and yes Pol Pot murdered less people than Hirohito.

How does this sentence sounds? It may sound like I'm supporting the later If your mind is tricked to believe that these are the only options available. It's your thinking that is flawed.

Sorry. You lost me. I'm just not clever enough to understand. Might as well drop this argument because it is all based on hypotheticals anyway since we'll never know what a McCain presidency would entail (thank the good Lord)!
 
Last edited:
Too bad, we will have to face what a Obama presidency will yield.

And btw your question was hypothetical to begin with. You compared McCain presidency (which never happened) to an Obama one. And you pushed me to the McCain camp (which I never was), without waiting for my opinion...then you said that I lost you (I never got you to begin with)...and you call me hypothetical?

That makes you 'hypocriticizer' too
 
Too bad, we will have to face what a Obama presidency will yield.

And btw your question was hypothetical to begin with. You compared McCain presidency (which never happened) to an Obama one. And you pushed me to the McCain camp (which I never was), without waiting for my opinion...then you said that I lost you (I never got you to begin with)...and you call me hypothetical?

That makes you 'hypocriticizer' too

1. I said it was hypothetical and thus hoped we could drop it.

2. I apologize for infering that you think McCain would have done less damage.

3. Forgive me for being a hypocrite (one of my many faults)
 
Israel better be prepared for some major blowback by pulling such a stunt. I just hope Obama wouldn't get our troops dragged into it. If McCain was president, there is no doubt in my mind our military would get involved. I'm just sayin'.


If Israel is attacked, we have treaties to come to their aid.
 
rpfan needs to take a chill pill. his doomsday scenarios go beyond the evidence at hand and actually drift into sadomasochism.
 
If Israel is attacked, we have treaties to come to their aid.

not if they start the fight. they have been engaged in many wars over the years, and we have not intervened.

yes, if Iran attacked unprovoked we would aid them. but they are talking about starting the war... in which case, they are on their own. :mad:
 
If Israel is attacked, we have treaties to come to their aid.

I recently read somewhere that such treaties would not apply in situations where Israel attacks (unprovoked) another country and then faces retaliatory attacks. I'll try and dig it up...
 
rpfan needs to take a chill pill. his doomsday scenarios go beyond the evidence at hand and actually drift into sadomasochism.


wht?

Do you realize that Obama's policies are EXACT replicas of Bush's? (even worse in some cases)

Only with a huge bailout cream added to it.

He already cheated the ppl with 'immediate pullout' crap, not only he will continue with torture but has also opened a new Gitmo like prison, not to mention tht he will let the previous torturers escape.
 
Last edited:
wht?

Do you realize that Obama's policies are EXACT replicas of Bush's? (even worse in some cases)

Only with a huge bailout cream added to it.

He already cheated the ppl with 'immediate pullout' crap, not only he will continue with torture but has also opened a new Gitmo like prison, not to mention tht he will let the previous torturers escape.

dude, you are doomsday profit with only partial evidence on your side. obama is ending guantanamo, at some point bailing us out of iraq, will probably normalize relations with cuba, will not attack iran, etc.

yes, you are correct with your doomsday scenarios of our economy, but we are foolish if we do not at least give obama some credit for trying to end the disastrous neocon foreign policy agenda.
 
dude, you are doomsday profit .

wht is that?

with only partial evidence on your side.
Obama's announcements are my evidence, I'm not sure if that's partial ..who can bet on a flip-flopper anyway.

obama is ending guantanamo,

Opening a new one, the devils of Gitmo including the Mingeles will be free to go. He upheld the need to torture and supported the notion that US should torture, torture to death, if required.

at some point bailing us out of iraq

Only a few troops will be withdrawn in 2011, rest will stay, indefinitely.

will probably normalize relations with cuba
Maybe, just maybe.


will not attack iran
,
can't attack Iran, won't dare to..

for example?

yes, you are correct with your doomsday scenarios of our economy, but we are foolish if we do not at least give obama some credit
for trying to
sort of pretend to
end the disastrous neocon foreign policy agenda
 
Last edited:
whatever, dude. it's hopeless trying to communicate with you, rpfan.
icon13.gif
 
Forget Hope, it was Ron Paul Hope for America

Talk about CHANGE

we all can believe in , even more

edit: apparently
 

An interesting article I just read which may relate to Israel's recent threats.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1239710719757&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

It seems the yearly Iranian Army Day festivities were less grand than in other years, with many military elements missing from the highly anticipated event.

I wonder if Iran is taking these Israeli threats seriously and are busy keeping these units at stand-by for any sudden Israeli attack?
 
Last edited:
An interesting article I just read which may relate to Israel's recent threats.

http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1239710719757&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull

It seems the yearly Iranian Army Day festivities were less grand than in other years, with many military elements missing from the highly anticipated event.

I wonder if Iran is taking these Israeli threats seriously and are busy keeping these units at stand-by for any sudden Israeli attack?

Well, probably, if they have any sense.
 
Back
Top