Obama-Global Poverty Act

question how much does this poverty act come out to be per citizen? i think i read somewhere that would mean each person in the US will have to be taxed $3,000 a yr to be able to support this?

Be careful about quoting the $845 Billion figure. It includes 7 years that have already passed in which we didn't pay what the Global Poverty supporters wanted, and forgiveness of junk loans that won't be repayed anyway. I crunched the numbers myself for a mail out on this for our local RLC, and came up with about $450 Billion including the forgiveness of loans, and $250 Billion excluding that.

It's still a ridiculous bill, and should be opposed at all cost, but it does us well to properly represent the effect, and not engage in hyperbole.
 
Obama's $845 billion U.N. plan forwarded to U.S. Senate floor

'Global Poverty Act' to cost each citizen $2,500 or more

The U.S. Senate soon could debate whether you, your spouse and each of your children – as well as your in-laws, parents, grandparents, neighbors and everyone else in America – each will spend $2,500 or more to reduce poverty around the world.

The plan sponsored by Sen. Barack Obama, the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee, is estimated to cost the U.S. some $845 billion over the coming few years in an effort to raise the standard of living around the globe.


Barack Obama

S.2433 already has been approved in one form by the U.S. House of Representatives and now has been placed on the Senate Legislative Calendar for pending debate.

WND previously reported the proposal demands the president develop "and implement" a policy to "cut extreme global poverty in half by 2015 through aid, trade, debt relief" and other programs.

Cliff Kincaid at Accuracy in Media has published a critique asserting that while the Global Poverty Act sounds nice, the adoption could "result in the imposition of a global tax on the United States" and would make levels of U.S. foreign aid spending "subservient to the dictates of the United Nations."

He said the legislation, if approved, dedicates 0.7 percent of the U.S. gross national product to foreign aid, which over 13 years, he said, would amount to $845 billion "over and above what the U.S. already spends."

The plan passed the House in 2007 "because most members didn't realize what was in it," Kincaid reported. "Congressional sponsors have been careful not to calculate the amount of foreign aid spending that it would require."

A recent statement from Obama's office noted the support offered by the Senate Foreign Relations Committee.

"With billions of people living on just dollars a day around the world, global poverty remains one of the greatest challenges and tragedies the international community faces," Obama said. "It must be a priority of American foreign policy to commit to eliminating extreme poverty and ensuring every child has food, shelter, and clean drinking water. As we strive to rebuild America's standing in the world, this important bill will demonstrate our promise and commitment to those in the developing world.

"Our commitment to the global economy must extend beyond trade agreements that are more about increasing profits than about helping workers and small farmers everywhere," he continued.

Another critic, however, has been commentator Glenn Beck


http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=70308
 
If you don’t want the Senate to approve Sen. Obama's S. 2433 to set in motion legislation to require the United States to spend hundreds of billions of dollars of new United Nations-inspired foreign aid spending by 2015, then please read on and send the editable email message below to your senators. Please act now! This bill could come up for a vote in the full Senate at any time after July 7th. The House has already passed its version of this bill (H.R. 1302) by a voice vote on September 25, 2007.

In September 2000 the UN General Assembly adopted the “United Nations Millennium Declaration ,” a very comprehensive, nine-page document that ends:

We solemnly reaffirm, on this historic occasion, that the United Nations is the indispensable common house of the entire human family, through which we will seek to realize our universal aspirations for peace, cooperation and development. We therefore pledge our unstinting support for these common objectives and our determination to achieve them.


The Declaration’s section on Development and Poverty Eradication sets the goal “To halve, by the year 2015, the proportion of the world’s people whose income is less than one dollar a day….”

Then, in 2002 the UN’s International Conference on Financing for Development in Monterrey, Mexico, established a goal for foreign aid to impoverished nations – 0.7 percent of the gross national product (GNP) of developed nations.

Next we have Senator Obama’s S. 2433 Global Poverty Act of 2007 which he introduced in the Senate on December 7, 2007. His bill is nearly identical to a House bill (H.R. 1302) that was passed in the House by a voice vote on September 25, 2007. The purpose of S. 2433 is:

To require the President to develop and implement a comprehensive strategy to further the United States foreign policy objective of promoting the reduction of global poverty, the elimination of extreme global poverty, and the achievement of the Millennium Development Goal of reducing by one-half the proportion of people worldwide, between 1990 and 2015, who live on less than $1 per day.


Thus, S. 2433 does not authorize or appropriate any money to fight global poverty, but only requires the President to develop a strategy to achieve UN Millennium Development goals, such as halving the proportion of people in the world who live on less than $1 per day by 2015. However, based on the 2002 UN goal of foreign aid spending of 0.7 percent of GNP by developed nations, it has been estimated by some conservative commentators that achieving the Millennium Declaration’s development goal of poverty reduction could cost the U.S. over $800 billion by 2015.

Although the Millennium Declaration also contains a whole host of other UN pet projects, such as greater UN regulation of light weapons and imposing the Kyoto Protocol to reduce global warming on the U.S., these projects are not addressed by S. 2433.

One interesting aspect of this S. 2433 bill is that when the Senate Foreign Relations Committee slightly amended the bill before reporting it out of committee with a favorable recommendation on April 24, they carefully went through the bill and wherever the words "United Nations Millennium Development Goals" appear, they deleted the words "United Nations." However, at the very end of the bill the committee was forced to admit the UN connection with the Millenium Development Goals when they explained:

The term "Millennium Development Goals" means the goals set out in the United Nations Millennium Declaration, General Assembly Resolution 55/2 (2000) .


The bottom line is that Americans should contact their senators in strong opposition to S. 2433, because Senator Obama’s Global Poverty Reduction Act would serve to grease the skids for further legislation to force the U.S. to empower the United Nations by fulfilling its extremely costly Millennium Declaration goals.


http://capwiz.com/jbs/issues/alert/?alertid=11590351
 
i'm pretty sure the US isn't going to be the only one paying the $850 billion or whatever

i heard a bunch of other western countries are going to chip in to, it's an international thing
 
Back
Top