Oathkeepers Call on President Trump to Use Insurrection Act

If any president believes there was legitimate widespread fraud in our elections it is indeed his duty to the Constitution to clean it up by any means necessary.

If Ron Paul were president, we'd all want him to do the same. (TDS'ers don't lie to yourself)

The only thing is, to maintain credibility of the Constitution, whoever calls for whatever military action in cleaning up the election should not be picking winners/losers from the results or whatever investigation but instead should institute a new election that is fairly run and resign after overseeing that election.

Trump should not resign after proving the fraud and either holding new elections or proving he won this one.
The whole point of the fraud was to get rid of him and that would give them what they want, Pence is no substitute.
 
Kind of like how you jumped the shark when you openly admitted that if Romney was the nominee in this election you'd vote for him?

That is seeming like a more and more reasonable conclusion based on some of the insane comments here. What is left of Trumpland is becoming mentally unstable.
 
Kind of like how you jumped the shark when you openly admitted that if Romney was the nominee in this election you'd vote for him?

Hmmm...speaking for myself I didn't vote for Trump and I wouldn't vote for Romney, but how is [MENTION=32418]69360[/MENTION] saying he'd vote for Romney over Biden any more "shark jumpy" than people here who said "Oh I know Trump is awful...but we gotta stop Biden?" :confused:
 
132010784_211893023768560_8633592032148247967_n.jpg
 
Hmmm...speaking for myself I didn't vote for Trump and I wouldn't vote for Romney, but how is @69360 saying he'd vote for Romney over Biden any more "shark jumpy" than people here who said "Oh I know Trump is awful...but we gotta stop Biden?" :confused:

Trump is a minimal good, he is not awful.
But even if you think he is awful we will still have elections if he wins, if Biden is allowed to get away with the fraud we will be Venezuela and won't have any chance to affect politics ever again.
 
Trump is a minimal good, he is not awful.
But even if you think he is awful we will still have elections if he wins, if Biden is allowed to get away with the fraud we will be Venezuela and won't have any chance to affect politics ever again.

You totally ignored my point. The question I asked is whether taking Romney over Biden is a shark jump move.
 
Trump is a minimal good, he is not awful.
But even if you think he is awful we will still have elections if he wins, if Biden is allowed to get away with the fraud we will be Venezuela and won't have any chance to affect politics ever again.
Exactly
 
You totally ignored my point. The question I asked is whether taking Romney over Biden is a shark jump move.
The answer to your question would be to not vote for either Biden or Romney and reject both of them completely. If Romney were president right now, he'd be advocating for the same shit Biden is. He would have funded the UN/Bill Gates funded companies just like Trump did.
 
Last edited:
The answer to your question would be to not vote for either Biden or Romney and reject both of them completely. If Romney were president right now, he'd be advocating for the same $#@! Biden is. He would have funded the UN/Bill Gates funded companies just like Trump did.

Oh. You're in the "none of the above" camp with me. Nevermind.
 
Trump is a minimal good, he is not awful.
But even if you think he is awful we will still have elections if he wins, if Biden is allowed to get away with the fraud we will be Venezuela and won't have any chance to affect politics ever again.

Says the person who thinks the president has the power to invalidate the election
 
Trump is a minimal good, he is not awful.
But even if you think he is awful we will still have elections if he wins, if Biden is allowed to get away with the fraud we will be Venezuela and won't have any chance to affect politics ever again.

Says the person who thinks the president has the power to invalidate the election

Says the person who thinks that FRAUD doesn’t invalidate the election.




.
 
Says the person who thinks the president has the power to invalidate the election

The People DO..

and the varied and splintered militia could be united in common purpose in one day..

74 million is the number passing around currently.

132031308_835994263917583_8810391800443517120_n.jpg
 
Trump is a minimal good, he is not awful.
But even if you think he is awful we will still have elections if he wins, if Biden is allowed to get away with the fraud we will be Venezuela and won't have any chance to affect politics ever again.

Fraud would invalidate the election


Says the person who states that removing Trump from office by any means necessary is not Fraud.




.



.
 
Trump is a minimal good, he is not awful.
But even if you think he is awful we will still have elections if he wins, if Biden is allowed to get away with the fraud we will be Venezuela and won't have any chance to affect politics ever again.

You're going to need to be moderately more coherent. Maybe post earlier in the morning, I think you're sundowning.

Do not stonewall.


Be a man an admit that you and your ilk have been trying for the past 41/2 years to effectuate a coup !!!!!!’


.
 
Do not stonewall.


Be a man an admit that you and your ilk have been trying for the past 41/2 years to effectuate a coup !!!!!!’

I'm not sure what "me and my ilk" have to do with whether or not the president can invalidate an election.
 
Trump is a minimal good, he is not awful.
But even if you think he is awful we will still have elections if he wins, if Biden is allowed to get away with the fraud we will be Venezuela and won't have any chance to affect politics ever again.

Your assertion lacks candor


.
 
Back
Top