NYT Op Ed: Time To Cancel Midterm Elections

AuH20

Account Restricted. Admin to review account standing
Joined
Feb 20, 2009
Messages
28,739
We're not moving fast enough to totalitarianism for their liking.

http://hotair.com/archives/2014/11/03/nyt-op-ed-its-time-to-cancel-midterm-elections/

The main impact of the midterm election in the modern era has been to weaken the president, the only government official (other than the powerless vice president) elected by the entire nation. Since the end of World War II, the president’s party has on average lost 25 seats in the House and about 4 in the Senate as a result of the midterms. This is a bipartisan phenomenon — Democratic presidents have lost an average of 31 House seats and between 4 to 5 Senate seats in midterms; Republican presidents have lost 20 and 3 seats, respectively…

These effects are compounded by our grotesque campaign finance system…

Another quirk is that, during midterm elections, the electorate has been whiter, wealthier, older and more educated than during presidential elections. Biennial elections require our representatives to take this into account, appealing to one set of voters for two years, then a very different electorate two years later…

There’s an obvious, simple fix, though. The government should, through a constitutional amendment, extend the term of House members to four years and adjust the term of senators to either four or eight years, so that all elected federal officials would be chosen during presidential election years. Doing so would relieve some (though, of course, not all) of the systemic gridlock afflicting the federal government and provide members of Congress with the ability to focus more time and energy on governance instead of electioneering.
 
Oh, wait, I see...

Another quirk is that, during midterm elections, the electorate has been whiter, wealthier, older and more educated than during presidential elections. Biennial elections require our representatives to take this into account, appealing to one set of voters for two years, then a very different electorate two years later.

Mid-term elections are racist.

Got it.
 
I keep saying that it is like voting to join the EU. You keep voting until you get it right, and then you don't need to vote anymore.
 
Twitter, ubiquitous video cameras, 24-hour cable news and a host of other technologies provide a level of hyper-accountability the framers could not possibly have imagined. In the modern age, we do not need an election every two years to communicate voters’ desires to their elected officials.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/11/03/opinion/cancel-the-midterms.html

LOL! Seriously? Government monitoring and government propaganda outlets provide hyper-accountability? Surely they jest.
 
I think we should just get it over with already and anoint a "High Chancellor Supreme Pooh-Bah Ruler and Glorious Leader For Life".

Then we wouldn't have to bother with such things anymore.
 
One could be forgiven for thinking there's an agenda being pursued to eliminate white people, or at the very least the influence thereof.

Nobody but white people would ever be so directly attacked in a NYT op-ed. Nobody. There's a genocidal streak at that paper that needs to be called out.
 
I keep saying that it is like voting to join the EU. You keep voting until you get it right, and then you don't need to vote anymore.
We only voted once here, 65% NO (on the constitution thing). Govt: "silly people, they got it all wrong, lets piss on them."

^^history.
 
They don't seem to appreciate "more educated" voters either. Gee, I wonder why... LOL

Amazing how every time you turn around, it's VOTE VOTE VOTE!!

Vote HARDER!

Unless of course you are "whiter, wealthier, older and more educated".

I wonder what the NYT reaction would be to an OP-ED that opined that presidential elections should be canceled because too much attention was being paid to getting the "blacker, poorer, younger and more stupid" vote?
 
Amazing how every time you turn around, it's VOTE VOTE VOTE!!

Vote HARDER!

Unless of course you are "whiter, wealthier, older and more educated".

I wonder what the NYT reaction would be to an OP-ED that opined that presidential elections should be canceled because too much attention was being paid to getting the "blacker, poorer, younger and more stupid" vote?

Soon there will be IQ cutoffs for voting (not there is much in the way of choice). ROFL
 
One could be forgiven for thinking there's an agenda being pursued to eliminate white people, or at the very least the influence thereof.

Nobody but white people would ever be so directly attacked in a NYT op-ed. Nobody. There's a genocidal streak at that paper that needs to be called out.

White people have a self genocidal streak.

They have been shamed into buying a bill of goods that tells them they are, basically, unfit to exist.
 
White people have a self genocidal streak.

They have been shamed into buying a bill of goods that tells them they are, basically, unfit to exist.

Just go in the shower and scrub the whiteness off!!
 
Wait, they want us to vote less hard?

I'm...I'm...so confused.

If it is not for throwing off skeptics , it could be a result of exhaustion from political horse trading. Why not make new buys of politicians less often and have more time to find/groom sure bet puppets... trying to think like a puppet master in the profitable democracy business.
 
Much of this money is sought from either highly partisan wealthy individuals or entities with vested interests before Congress. Eliminating midterms would double the amount of time House members could focus on governing and make them less dependent on their donor base.

The only time that politicians pay lip-service to the electorate is when they are campaigning. Less elections mean they could dedicate more energy to their crony benefactors and masters.
 
If it is not for throwing off skeptics , it could be a result of exhaustion from political horse trading. Why not make new buys of politicians less often and have more time to find/groom sure bet puppets... trying to think like a puppet master in the profitable democracy business.

Well, there's something to be said for that.

Theye have arranged it in such a way as to not have had a one term president in well over twenty years.
 
Back
Top