NYC Dept. of Education Wants to Ban 50 Words

interesting to see the thought controllers in action.

Orwell missed it by about 200 years.
 
The word “dinosaur” made the hit list because dinosaurs suggest evolution which creationists might not like, WCBS 880′s Marla Diamond reported. “Halloween” is targeted because it suggests paganism; a “birthday” might not be happy to all because it isn’t celebrated by Jehovah’s Witnesses.


Sounds like they should ban religion, not words.


:rolleyes:
 
I think the word "religion" is on the list.

Why do you think "religion" and "religious holidays" are banned? Because of competing religions. Get rid of them all and you don't have a problem here. Or, you know, we could just quit being so hypersensitive to everything.
 
Does banning the word for something make that something cease to exist or just the word used to describe it?
 
http://newyork.cbslocal.com/2012/03...bidden-words-removed-from-standardized-tests/

They want to ban words like "poverty" and "computer" if referenced as a home computer. LMAO

Language is the single most important skill a human being ever develops, bar none. Without language there is nothing that can be called distinctly human. Without it, humans would be relegated to a life of reflex. Without it, humanity would not survive.

Given this, it is clear why one might be interested in destroying the power of mind that language imparts by destroying language itself in very specific ways that leave the individual incapable of higher level reasoning and perception while preserving lower functions. This is effectively accomplished through the alteration of the individual's language capabilities. We have all borne witness to this over the past 40 years and more, though many have most likely not been able to connect those dots as they are generally unaware of the prime role that language serves in enabling everything that builds our realities.

I would almost be willing to bet there exists not one in one million persons who understand that language is literally life for the human race and that without it there would be no humanity of which to speak.

Edit:

Last night I pondered this notion of pure reflex as the only life available to us without language and realized that this is almost completely true, but not quite entirely so. On reflection I realized that there is in fact a rudimentary conceptual existence that would accompany the life of the reflexes. It is, however, a very low level of conceptualization that I suspect is hard-wired into us. I do not believe that it would serve as a standalone mechanism of ideation per se, but rather as perhaps a primitive means of filtration of sensory data.

For example, distance would be a hard-wired concept to help one assess potential threats based on how far away an object may be. If I am atop a large hill and spy a lion a mile away, my reaction may be significantly different than if the lion is 100 yards away. The concept of distance, therefore, aids in survival despite one being non-verbal. The concept of an obstacle similarly aids one by preventing Joe Caveman from running face first into a tree because the hard-wired understanding that two objects cannot occupy the same space lends an inborn understanding.

Just the musings of a mad engineer.
 
Last edited:
Language is the single most important skill a human being ever develops, bar none. Without language there is nothing that can be called distinctly human. Without it, humans would be relegated to a life of reflex. Without it, humanity would not survive.

Given this, it is clear why one might be interested in destroying the power of mind that language imparts by destroying language itself in very specific ways that leave the individual incapable of higher level reasoning and perception while preserving lower functions. This is effectively accomplished through the alteration of the individual's language capabilities. We have all borne witness to this over the past 40 years and more, though many have most likely not been able to connect those dots as they are generally unaware of the prime role that language serves in enabling everything that builds our realities.

I would almost be willing to bet there exists not one in one million persons who understand that language is literally life for the human race and that without it there would be no humanity of which to speak.
Reminds me of a similar part of the Bible... Care to elaborate?
 
Just say NO to more legislation!

Let these poor sensitive "people" limit their own vocabulary if they choose.

My kid is going to learn the meaning and proper use of as many words as he's able.
 
Oh well, we let these people get in charge, and no one dares call them out on it. And so we regress.
 
What would you say to somebody on another board who replied with this:

I love the sensationalism from the conservatives.

This is neither a repeal of verbiage in society nor curricula.

It is an attempt to make standardized tests a true reflection of knowledge, free from emotional cues.

Read some Wittgenstein.
 
Back
Top