NY Times article on Ron and Rand - June 5 (Unintentional humor)

[0zzy]

"Paul's" from the Lexington Herald, lol.

Paul's values.
that's grammatically correct.
only talking about Rand in the headline,
if that's what you were talking about.

 

[SolusSLX]

It only takes a minute to register with a fake email ([email protected]) to recommend the good "editor highlighted" comments over the ones selected for propaganda.

 

[Andrew-Austin]

Reading some of the comments. I can truly say that people who comment on their site only do so because in the real world if someone could respond to their idiocy, well they'd really look the fool.

Like this one. I had to laugh.



This person thinks that Paul's shouldn't run? As if they are trying to use government to impose their nonsense on others?

It amazes me that after about 3 years of getting this message out there that some people are so damn stupid and lack comprehension on even the most basic levels that they cannot understand that the Paul's try to get the government not to impose other people's ideas on other people.

That is so ignorant it manages to be both painful and cute at the same time.

 

[low preference guy]

reading ramblings by angry second graders is more enlightened than reading the New York Times comments section.