NY Times article has important facts-Ron "can't fully endorse", for one

sailingaway

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
72,103
Mr. Paul, in an interview, said convention planners had offered him an opportunity to speak under two conditions: that he deliver remarks vetted by the Romney campaign, and that he give a full-fledged endorsement of Mr. Romney. He declined.

“It wouldn’t be my speech,” Mr. Paul said. “That would undo everything I’ve done in the last 30 years. I don’t fully endorse him for president.”

http://www.nytimes.com/2012/08/26/u...h-to-a-libertarian-legion.html?pagewanted=all
 
I thought something like that might be the case. He's not going to endorse Romney.
 
Last edited:
Damn straight. I hope teh doubters who saw Rand and Ron as the same person will have the humility to confess their mistake and shut up.
 
522048_3903262494945_561782446_n.jpg
 
Epic win...it is crucial that Ron preserves his legacy and goes out fighting. :)
 
Last edited:
I wish he would have submitted an approved speech and then went off script. It would have been interesting to see anyway.
 
I wish he would have submitted an approved speech and then went off script. It would have been interesting to see anyway.
Oh but Ron would never stoop so low as to deceive.

Edit: Unlike those he is running against.
 
Last edited:
True to his word to the end.

Never wavering. A stranger to compromise. Means what he says and says what he means.

Dr. Ron Paul! America needs leaders like you. Unfortunately, you're the exception and not the rule.
 
True to his word to the end.

Never wavering. A stranger to compromise. Means what he says and says what he means.

Dr. Ron Paul! America needs leaders like you. Unfortunately, you're the exception and not the rule.
He definitely stands apart from the others.
NotLikeTheOthers.jpg
 
Back
Top