NWO..... deal or no deal?

NWO......deal or no deal?

  • Deal!

    Votes: 162 84.8%
  • no deal, its just a conspiracy

    Votes: 29 15.2%

  • Total voters
    191
That's it?

You asked for 2 sentences and you got it and then you complain about it. No wonder these people want to microchip the population...1/2 of you, even on this forum, is nothing more than a bucket of drool :eek:
 
Last edited:
I love the second option in the poll: "no deal, its just a conspiracy"

LOL... makes me laugh, because you see, it is a conspiracy.
So many people conclude a conspiracy is something that isn't ever true.
When our founding fathers drew up the Declaration of Independence, it was a conspiracy.
I have to wonder how many people actually understand this concept.
 
I love the second option in the poll: "no deal, its just a conspiracy"

LOL... makes me laugh, because you see, it is a conspiracy.
So many people conclude a conspiracy is something that isn't ever true.
When our founding fathers drew up the Declaration of Independence, it was a conspiracy.
I have to wonder how many people actually understand this concept.

They aren't trained to think about it...they are trained liked Pavlov's dog that when they hear the word conspiracy to begin to drool and think "tin foil hat nuts".
 
I love the second option in the poll: "no deal, its just a conspiracy"

LOL... makes me laugh, because you see, it is a conspiracy.
So many people conclude a conspiracy is something that isn't ever true.
When our founding fathers drew up the Declaration of Independence, it was a conspiracy.
I have to wonder how many people actually understand this concept.

Confucius: "When words change their meaning, men lose their liberty"

How ironic
 
I guess it might be a good idea to discuss the definition of conspiracy.

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/conspiracy

conspiracy

1: the act of conspiring together
2 a: an agreement among conspirators b: a group of conspirators
----------------------------------------------------------------
conspire

1 a: to join in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act or an act which becomes unlawful as a result of the secret agreement <accused of conspiring to overthrow the government> b: scheme2: to act in harmony toward a common end <circumstances conspired to defeat his efforts>

When our founding fathers conspired to break away from British rule, in the eyes of Britain, they were joining in a secret agreement to do an unlawful or wrongful act.

When the Declaration of Independence was written, it was a secret, the British were not to know it was happening till in fact they were presented with the declaration.

The founding fathers were acting in harmony toward a common end. They were plotting to overthrow the present government of that time and replace it with another.
 
You asked for 2 sentences and you got it and then you complain about it. No wonder these people want to microchip the population...1/2 of you, even on this forum, is nothing more than a bucket of drool :eek:

Now explain in 2 sentences how I "complained" about anything.
 
They aren't trained to think about it...they are trained liked Pavlov's dog that when they hear the word conspiracy to begin to drool and think "tin foil hat nuts".

I took the poll to mean:


1. Yes, I'll take a New World Order, please.
2. No, it's a conspiracy so I would not like a New World Order.


Also, when I said "That's it?" I meant "Is that all there is or is there something else?"

Because I hear things about concentration camps, martial law, and population control, so I assumed that the NWO theory contained a bit more than "one world government."
 
Because I hear things about concentration camps, martial law, and population control, so I assumed that the NWO theory contained a bit more than "one world government."

Those are all means toward an end.
 
I took the poll to mean:


1. Yes, I'll take a New World Order, please.
2. No, it's a conspiracy so I would not like a New World Order.


Also, when I said "That's it?" I meant "Is that all there is or is there something else?"

Because I hear things about concentration camps, martial law, and population control, so I assumed that the NWO theory contained a bit more than "one world government."

There's literally centuries of information on this subject. You can't get it in 2 sentences. Unfortunately that is why people don't understand it. They can't get it in a sound bite and then go back to looking at nekid pictures of something.
 
if someone came up to me on the street and asked me to tell them what the new world order is, what should i tell them?

Iow, i would like someone to give me a 1-2 sentence definition of the term "new world order."






>

dyodr! You can only convince yourself.
 
Last edited:
does anyone have any quotes or theories that contradict the New World Order conspiracy? Im curious to hear a con argument
 
does anyone have any quotes or theories that contradict the New World Order conspiracy? Im curious to hear a con argument

All monopolies fail when the exchange of goods and services is not mutually beneficial - libertarian credo

By that oh-so-common free-market snippet of wisdom, surely no government could hold a monopoly on force for any significant amount of time.
 
T J quotes:

Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day, but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, unalterable through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate, systematical plan of reducing us to slavery.

Experience hath shewn, that even under the best forms (of government) those entrusted with power have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted it into tyranny.

I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.

If the American people ever allow private banks to control issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and the corporations will grow up around them, will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.

I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy of our monied corporations, which dare already to challenge our government to a trial of strength and bid defiance to the laws of our country.

When people fear the government, you have tyranny, but when government fears the people, you have liberty.

In questions of power... let no more be heard of confidence in men, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the constitution.

The whole of government consists in the art of being honest.

If people let government decide what foods they eat and what medicines they take, their bodies will soon be in as sorry a state as are the souls of those who live under tyranny.

If a Nation expects to be ignorant and free in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be. If we are to guard against ignorance and remain free, it is the responsibility of every American to be informed.
 
All monopolies fail when the exchange of goods and services is not mutually beneficial - libertarian credo

By that oh-so-common free-market snippet of wisdom, surely no government could hold a monopoly on force for any significant amount of time.

"All monopolies fail when the exchange of goods and services is not mutually beneficial - libertarian credo"

Err No... natural market monopolies, that arose from being the beating the competition in the free market - whom have now gained complete market share - risk losing it but raising its product, goods or services price above the market equilibrium. It allows for another competitor to enter the market offering the product at a lower price.

Unnatural monopolies (state intervention/state owned/laws maintaining them) fail when the unnatural order is relinquished or taken away. Subsidies etc etc.

History shows that totalitarian states have generally failed... but MORE often than NOT it's because of the actions of OTHER states... By example or whatever...

WHAT THE ----, is to happen when there is only ONE state in all existence. You can't RUN away from it.. you can't establish differing laws etc. In the entire history of man, people have tried - but always failed in conquering the world. Now, it really is within reach.

"surely no government could hold a monopoly on force for any significant amount of time"

"If you want a picture of the future, imagine a boot stamping on a human face - forever." George Orwell
 
No deal.

The accumulation and centralization of government is merely the result of the base human desire for power. It is not some Machiavellian conspiracy, it is human nature.

It's rather childish to go looking for bogeymen instead of facing the fact that this is a battle against ourselves.
 
No deal.

The accumulation and centralization of government is merely the result of the base human desire for power. It is not some Machiavellian conspiracy, it is human nature.

It's rather childish to go looking for bogeymen instead of facing the fact that this is a battle against ourselves.

Thank you.

The conspiracies are human nature too, we always want to find some design or planning behind events. We like to think that there is some greater thing or agenda behind everything. It's pretty much the same thing as with religion.
 
No deal.

The accumulation and centralization of government is merely the result of the base human desire for power. It is not some Machiavellian conspiracy, it is human nature.

It's rather childish to go looking for bogeymen instead of facing the fact that this is a battle against ourselves.

Fail. So there is no global elite? And who the fk exactly is "ourselves" Mr Collectivist? :rolleyes:

The conspiracies are human nature too, we always want to find some design or planning behind events. We like to think that there is some greater thing or agenda behind everything. It's pretty much the same thing as with religion.

:rolleyes: Conspiracies are, of course. Go look up the definition. Tell me, the military industrial complex; does it exist?
 
Last edited:
Durrrrrr FAIL :rolleyes:

Mr. Collectivist? Are you attempting to hurt my feelings?

Since you've been so polite and thoughtful, I'll go ahead and help you out with this one. Ourselves = mankind. Everyone.
 
Back
Top