NV CAUCUS-GOERS: Please post your observations / live results in this thread!

I am an Athiest now, but was raised in a strict Seventh-Day-Adventist family. The Religion is very similar to other Christian Religions except they believe the 7th day (Lords day) is on a Saturday and not a Sunday. They open the Sabbath Friday evening and observe it till Saturday Sunset. It would be much easier to pretend to be a Seventh-Day-Adventist than a Jew for the average person.

This is all quite ridiculous...
 
So you think this is fixed?

You're levying a ridiculously serious and grave accusation. I suggest you have at least a shred of evidence before you make it.

They are still missing precincts in Iowa that coincidentally were near a University that was strongly Ron Paul. They reported votes tonight that went into a gated community and not to where they were supposed to go. They evidence is there. If the required proff is our election officials launching a real investigation and reporting on it then Gingrinch can win with 10,000,000,000 Martian votes and it would still count.
 
Last edited:
from what i got they are not letting people in that ALREADY voted. They have to sign a paper saying they haven't voted to get in. has nothing to do about being a sabbath keeper. The guy that wanted to go in had already voted and just wanted to come in and observe

From what I understand they are being forced to sign a petition saying the reason they didn't vote in an earlier caucus is because of their religion. It is based on religion.
 
AAngel3 AAngel3
RT @RalstonFlash RT @markzbarabak: Special Adelson caucus turning into fiasco, just as many predicted. People upset being asked to sign r...
 
Yeah right. It's just perfectly normal in US elections to only allow Jews into a polling place. Nothing out of the ordinary here. Let's just go home and get some sleep

THE FIX IS IN!

THEY ARE OUT TO GET RON PAUL! THEY HATE RON! THEY HATE AMERICAN! AND LIBERTY! AND KITTENS!

FIX IS IN!
 
\
So what exactly would you do if someone put their hands on you preventing you from observing an election when every media outlet has misrepresented your candidate for years or ignored him and you were told that if he won it would discredt the party?

Doesn't matter.. I'm a 'badge' and unless they, too, were gun-toters... that was assault plain and simple. They went hands on = illegal!
 
They are still missing precincts in Iowa that coincidentally were near a University that was strongly Ron Paul. They reported votes tonight went into a gated community and not to where they were supposed to go. They evidence is there.


The missing votes in Iowa were completely insignificant.

And the votes taken into the gated community today were also trivial.

If every single one of those votes had been cast for Ron, think it would have made any material difference on the delegate count?



I hate that some of you guys force me to defense The GOP and the party establishment, but you have to keep things in perspective and focus on the order of magnitude involved in these "irregularities"
 
I am an Athiest now, but was raised in a strict Seventh-Day-Adventist family. The Religion is very similar to other Christian Religions except they believe the 7th day (Lords day) is on a Saturday and not a Sunday. They open the Sabbath Friday evening and observe it till Saturday Sunset. It would be much easier to pretend to be a Seventh-Day-Adventist than a Jew for the average person.

This is all quite ridiculous... (Sorry about the accidental double post)
 
Last edited:
\
So what exactly would you do if someone put their hands on you preventing you from observing an election when every media outlet has misrepresented your candidate for years or ignored him and you were told that if he won it would discredt the party?

I'd probably call the cops, or just sign the stupid affidavit and walk in anyway. I wouldn't cause an absurd scene, borne out of ridiculous emotional outbursts.
 
So you think this is fixed?

You're levying a ridiculously serious and grave accusation. I suggest you have at least a shred of evidence before you make it.

Well, he has a point in that the span of the numbers is very very unusual for any election.
Once you remove the special block votes (for example in this case mormon dominated districts) you shouldn't see more variety than about 15% diversity in the mainstream of the election.
30% is really off the wall, and would usually either point to borked numbers or to the fact that the electorate is deeply split, split beyond repair even.
 
Back
Top