NV CAUCUS-GOERS: Please post your observations / live results in this thread!

[SCOTUSman]

Yes, Sailingaway is doing a great job updating us. Please leave it for numbers and what not...not for arguments.

Thanks, sailingaway.

 

[Noblegeorge]

We need SECOND.

Believe me im desperate for second as well and refreshing every 5 minutes and you know the funny thing?? I live in Ireland! But im sitting here on a saturday night and I cant think of anything but this campaign!

 

[DGraham]

Come on guys, lets keep the thread on topic.

 

[sailingaway]

I knew it wouldn't be long until someone basically said he was COINTELPRO

saying someone is trolling isn't saying they are....what was it?

 

[DGraham]

Believe me im desperate for second as well and refreshing every 5 minutes and you know the funny thing?? I live in Ireland! But im sitting here on a saturday night and I cant think of anything but this campaign!

I'm in Ireland as well!

 

[KingNothing]

Will you please stop with this ridiculous question? We don't need to 'name names' to suspect something is afoot. Do we need to know the name of some backroom news chief at Fox that pulls the 'positive' Ron Paul story and runs a 'Unelectable' story instead? If we don't know his name, does that mean stuff like that doesn't happen?

Do we need to know the names of the people at some caucus who refuse to count votes on site and instead drive them somewhere? Does not knowing their names in advance mean it never happened?

Does it matter if things like this happen at a local level (a nefarious individual acting on their own) or if there is a puppet master?

No.

Vote fraud is as old as voting. Media manipulation is as old as media, and better perfected every year. To deny the possibility of either is ignorant. To insist we must know their names to level charges is the height of fallacious thinking.

But we do know the names of people "guilty" of what you're saying on a global level - the neoconservatives. They've risen to sufficiently high enough places in the media and politics to impress upon the voting public what they believe voters should think and feel. This is the applecart Paul is working to overturn.

At a local level, the degree of voting "fraud" that has occurred has been completely, unquestionably, negligible.

 

[goldpants]

Will you please stop with this ridiculous question? We don't need to 'name names' to suspect something is afoot. Do we need to know the name of some backroom news chief at Fox that pulls the 'positive' Ron Paul story and runs a 'Unelectable' story instead? If we don't know his name, does that mean stuff like that doesn't happen?

Do we need to know the names of the people at some caucus who refuse to count votes on site and instead drive them somewhere? Does not knowing their names in advance mean it never happened?

Does it matter if things like this happen at a local level (a nefarious individual acting on their own) or if there is a puppet master?

No.

Vote fraud is as old as voting. Media manipulation is as old as media, and better perfected every year. To deny the possibility of either is ignorant. To insist we must know their names to level charges is the height of fallacious thinking.

+REP

 

[bbwarfield]

Im telling you.... if people overseas could vote... Ron would win cause we wouldnt be dragging them all on our silly little wars every weekend

 

[Txrose4ever]

Believe me im desperate for second as well and refreshing every 5 minutes and you know the funny thing?? I live in Ireland! But im sitting here on a saturday night and I cant think of anything but this campaign!

LOL.... Wow.

 

[Orgoonian]

Believe me im desperate for second as well and refreshing every 5 minutes and you know the funny thing?? I live in Ireland! But im sitting here on a saturday night and I cant think of anything but this campaign!

Cheers!

 

[rb3b3]

WHERES DREX????? Drex we need you man!!

 

[Ron Paul + YouTube= Free]

SE-COND SE-COND SE-COND SE-COND SE-COND (everyone dance in a circle around your computer and chant this to win).

This is proven to be much more effective than bickering.

 

[Diurdi]

Because Intrade almost always gets it right. Much better than the polls. For the same reason the free market works. It aggregates information from everyone involved to predict the outcome.

Ofcourse it gets it right as it changes as the results come in lol.

 

[carterm]

up to date spreadsheet (i have been informing them about new results) has us down to grinch 53 (so close still) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ap5nJ9CgQStidE0wZ2pPZmdWejQ5azEzZG1kUUZEc0E#gid=0

edit: to hold us over until drex arrives

 

[RPit]

SE-COND SE-COND SE-COND SE-COND SE-COND (everyone dance in a circle around your computer and chant this to win).

This is proven to be much more effective than bickering.

LMAO!!

 

[pipewerKz]

kickasnowflake kickasnowflake
@
@RalstonFlash From Valley High School caucus volunteer: Romney 136; Paul 115; Gingrich 50; Santorum 29

Interesting, I wonder who this is. There were only 6 of us volunteering.

 

[thelaibon]

Will you please stop with this ridiculous question? We don't need to 'name names' to suspect something is afoot. Do we need to know the name of some backroom news chief at Fox that pulls the 'positive' Ron Paul story and runs a 'Unelectable' story instead? If we don't know his name, does that mean stuff like that doesn't happen?

Do we need to know the names of the people at some caucus who refuse to count votes on site and instead drive them somewhere? Does not knowing their names in advance mean it never happened?

Does it matter if things like this happen at a local level (a nefarious individual acting on their own) or if there is a puppet master?

No.

Vote fraud is as old as voting. Media manipulation is as old as media, and better perfected every year. To deny the possibility of either is ignorant. To insist we must know their names to level charges is the height of fallacious thinking.

Perfect & eloquent!

 

[KingNothing]

Hey you guys!

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet...2pPZmdWejQ5azEzZG1kUUZEc0E&toomany=true#gid=0

...has us only 1-point down to Newty for second.


That would definitely seem to imply good things in our near future.

 

[neverseen]

up to date spreadsheet (i have been informing them about new results) has us down to grinch 53 (so close still) https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Ap5nJ9CgQStidE0wZ2pPZmdWejQ5azEzZG1kUUZEc0E#gid=0

edit: to hold us over until drex arrives

I don't think this sheet is very accurate. Doesn't line up at all with Dex's numbers...

 

[RonPaulRules]

Twitter Exit Poll for the #NVcaucus: Romney 57.0%, Gingrich 18.5%, Paul 17.6, Santorum 6.9%, 76 precincts, 2505 votes. @fivethirtyeight