Lord Xar
Member
- Joined
- Jun 24, 2007
- Messages
- 7,803
@AnjeanetteDamon: Precinct 7731: Paul: 8; Romney: 7; Santorum: 4; Gingrich: 3. #nvcaucus/And another for Paul.
yup. great. we need HUGE turnout for Ron in these precincts.. perception matters!
@AnjeanetteDamon: Precinct 7731: Paul: 8; Romney: 7; Santorum: 4; Gingrich: 3. #nvcaucus/And another for Paul.
So no Google maps this time?
Of course, this could be anything from a 2 vote lead in a 20 vote precinct to something like 20-100 votes in the lead in a huge precinct.
Still, I think we'll come second. The areas we did best in (eg. Nye) aren't even in yet.
So naive. Do research on Bev Harris and voter fraud before you formulate opinions.
Appeal to ridicule.
So do bromides. Perhaps you'd care to name names?
so these "rural" places...what's the deal on them
In this race? Damn little. Newt doesn't have people in place to commit it, and Romney has already won.
If the people who are in a position to do such a thing were so inclined, it would be to push Gingrich down. Not up. Down.
And nobody is going to take a chance at tossing their career, and going to a Nevada penitentiary, over a second place finish nobody with any power in the state cares about.
If you find yourself thinking they would... loosen the tin foil.
RalstonFlash: Latest from field: Romney holding at 60, but likely to go down a bit. Near tie for 2nd. Watch Elko, Nye: Paul will do well there. #nvcaucus
There's still hope for 2nd yet. Gingrich trading way too high on Intrade IMO at 78%.
I didn't nec mention Nevada, even though this thread is about NV.
Are you telling me that there was no possible fraud in IA?
I didn't nec mention Nevada, even though this thread is about NV.
Are you telling me that there was no possible fraud in IA?