NV CAUCUS-GOERS: Please post your observations / live results in this thread!

[KingNothing]

Lol what happened?

Paul basically gave a 20 minute stump speech on CNN.

It was very nice.


I don't think there was anything conspiratorial about it. On nights votes are cast, they've been showing speeches from the candidates. Seems like what they do.

 

[Lord Xar]

Guys... listen.. did all the rural results come in yet? Why, no more tweets from the rural areas.. I only saw like 4 tweets from those areas.

 

[FrancisMarion]

"that we understand the definitions of words"

 

[Barrex]

Guys... listen.. did all the rural results come in yet? Why, no more tweets from the rural areas.. I only saw like 4 tweets from those areas.

I hope I can get away with this:

Peasants got forks not internet.

My parents are from "rural area"

 

[Sarge]

The Nevada Chairman said more voters than Romney got last time. No one said 30k. Romney got around 22,649k last time.

Unless I am missing something, we are not anywhere close to 22K some for Ron right now.

 

[RonRules]

So the FCC isn't part of The Establishment, but CNN is?

Really? Reeeeaaallly?

a

they're no ALL against us. Some bureaucrats will occasionally do their job.

 

[fatjohn]

Unless I am missing something, we are not anywhere close to 22K some for Ron right now.

yes this.

 

[Lord Xar]

I hope I can get away with this:

Peasants got forks not internet.

My parents are from "rural area"

So then the assumption that we are still waiting on them is valid?

 

[neverseen]

how much longer until more reports come in? 8pm est?

 

[CTRattlesnake]

how much longer until more reports come in? 8pm est?

Yup, polls close in nevada at 5 local time

 

[Txrose4ever]

They are about to update the numbers in a few minutes. Here's hoping our lead over Gingrich widens..............

 

[Aratus]

30 minutes

 

[Bruno]

how much longer until more reports come in? 8pm est?

I think so.

Fox not showing the 3% in, Cnn has been for a long time.

 

[KingNothing]

a

they're no ALL against us. Some bureaucrats will occasionally do their job.

You've got to be careful with theories like this, bud. It's a simplistic view, that makes the world insanely complicated.

You basically start with a conclusion, and then no matter what happens you attribute it to a conspiracy against Paul.

Couldn't it just be that CNN showed Paul's speech because he's doing better than expected in the state that is voting today, and happened to be giving a speech? That is the simplest and most rational explanation, is it not? And hell, to even add a bit to it, they know that when they show Paul they'll get a lot more people to tune in and to discuss their broadcast on Twitter.

 

[bobburn]

Unless I am missing something, we are not anywhere close to 22K some for Ron right now.

IDed does not equal number of those who will turn out.

 

[ross11988]

IDed does not equal number of those who will turn out.

30K 'ID'd' in Iowa. Only 22K voted. SAD

 

[Mark37snj]

CNN just showed a bunch Nevada precint reporters reporting on the results. They said voter turnout was low and in all the precints where Mittler won...I saw old people. There were very few < 65 age voters in those precint voting rooms.

EDIT: CNN 26% of voters were Mormon and Romney won 91% of those.

 

[lakerssuck92]

30K 'ID'd' in Iowa. Only 22K voted. SAD

*26K voted

 

[TheGrinch]

You've got to be careful with theories like this, bud. It's a simplistic view, that makes the world insanely complicated.

You basically start with a conclusion, and then no matter what happens you attribute it to a conspiracy against Paul.

Couldn't it just be that CNN showed Paul's speech because he's doing better than expected in the state that is voting today, and happened to be giving a speech? That is the simplest and most rational explanation, is it not? And hell, to even add a bit to it, they know that when they show Paul they'll get a lot more people to tune in and to discuss their broadcast on Twitter.

Then why don't they do this all the time, since we clearly bring in great ratings?

Answer: when it really matters on primetime, like their recent coverage of debates on CNN, they ignore him, because they're employed by the billionaire status quo he stands against.

 

[KingNothing]

Then why don't they do this all the time, since we clearly bring in great ratings?

Answer: when it really matters on primetime, like their recent coverage of debates on CNN, they ignore him, because they're employed by the billionaire status quo he stands against.

There certainly is a media bias against Paul. I don't deny that. But when you say that the reason they PUT PAUL ON TV was itself a conspiracy.... well... you're venturing down a very complicated path that's difficult to return from.