NRA doesn't endorse in KY, despite Conway wanting to require gun show checks 4 sale

sailingaway

Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2010
Messages
72,103
http://www.kentucky.com/2010/10/22/1491048/ap-ahead-nra-hasnt-endorsed-in.html

On the other hand, they couldn't endorse Conway, since they'd lose credibility with gun owners.... Rand has more credibility than they do.

And the article says Rand 'won't disclose his gun' which is ludicrous, the document just didn't happen to mention it. He has a Mossberg shotgun. He's mentioned it at gun show when people asked.
 
Last edited:
An endorsement from the Gun Owners of America is more meaningful to me.
 
This actually a huge loss for Conway. The NRA almost always endorses established politicians with a record so they don't get on their bad side. This was a big deal when they didn't endorse Harry Reid.

This means that they think it's less dangerous to stay out and cross Conway rather than back him up against Paul. A non-endorsement of Conway means they think Rand is going to win.
 
. A non-endorsement of Conway means they think Rand is going to win.

Everyone with half a brain thinks Rand is going to win.

Even Fozz posted that Rand is going to win on another thread.

(I know, I know, I couldn't believe my eyes.....)

--

Only if we do the work, however.
 
Too bad GOA doesn't have the bank that the NRA does. "Rand Paul has received the endorsement of Gun Owners of America. Jack Conway has not been endorsed by any gun rights organization. Dr. Rand Paul: The only choice for the 2nd Amendment"
 
Too bad GOA doesn't have the bank that the NRA does. "Rand Paul has received the endorsement of Gun Owners of America. Jack Conway has not been endorsed by any gun rights organization. Dr. Rand Paul: The only choice for the 2nd Amendment"

We need to change that then. ----- After the election of course.
 
Back
Top