r3volutionpaul91
Member
- Joined
- Jan 10, 2012
- Messages
- 49
this country deserves whats gonna happen in 2013
tweet
Edie Emery @edie_emery Close
CNN caucus cam inside ND caucus -- district counting is happening in Fargo. Could be a while before we know...
The bottom line is that Rick Santorum and Mitt Romney have both run far more effective campaigns. Some call ir retail politics. I know I'm going to get flamed for it, but they've just worked harder than Ron has. Neither man does a rally or two and then goes home for a week. Like it or not, they are out there working for votes, not holding mega pep rallies and singing to their own choir.
tweet
Edie Emery @edie_emery Close
CNN caucus cam inside ND caucus -- district counting is happening in Fargo. Could be a while before we know...
Why'd George W. Bush get two terms? This country's full of morons.
The media robbed us of Iowa, its funny how they waited until the last few days to push the newsletters and pump up Santorum. He was not even registering on the polls until the last few days. And his organization is poor, doesn't mean you can't win states with poor organization though.
Yup, this too.
If we won Iowa this would probably be a totally different race. Santorum would have probably dropped out after SC.
that doesn't address why he beats Obama.
This is what I'm wanting to know as well
Dave Kolpack @DaveKolpackAP Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Unofficial @ap results from #SuperTuesdayND for the Fargo districts: Rick Santorum 878, Ron Paul 787. Romney third, Gingrich fourth.
? i'm just posting what i see...no idea whats going on
.......So thousands of people at a rally, but no one votes?
Dave Kolpack @DaveKolpackAP Reply Retweet Favorite · Open
Unofficial @ap results from #SuperTuesdayND for the Fargo districts: Rick Santorum 878, Ron Paul 787. Romney third, Gingrich fourth.
? i'm just posting what i see...no idea whats going on
RP did really well in campigning in Iowa and would have won it if he would have had a solid plan to deal wint the newletters when it most surely was going to come up.I'm not trying to "flame" you, but that's not the whole story.
Certainly Ron's campaign schedule/events are partly to blame. And I've wondered aloud here previously why he kept doing the same thing in state after state when it wasn't getting results.
But to claim that this is the "bottom line" is just absurd. Ron could talk to an inner city church, a group of small business owners, a college campus, and a group of veterans. But you know what the news story would be that day? About how Santorum drew a "large crowd of 400".
That's how Michigan played out. Ron was on the ground for as much time as any other candidate, drew more audience member to any function, and got next to nothing from the media. Half of Michigan voters probably didn't even think he was running - all the news shows (local TV and radio included) framed the race as "Mitt vs. Rick".
Imagine how BAD Ron's results would have been if Ron played to small diners and tried to talk to the deaf ears of the GOP establishment in the state. It would have been worse media exposure - instead of "next to nothing" - it would have been EXACTLY nothing.
Sorry, but Ron's worked nearly as hard as Mitt or Rick, you just don't see it because every time Romney pops his head in a manufacturing convention, there's 18 media cameras. So what's the point of working harder if you're not gonna get any marginal benefits anyway?
Do you think the media would all of a sudden start focusing on Ron if he did something different? Certainly he didn't do things perfectly - but I don't see how if could've got much different results without the media's help.