North Dakota currently voting for delegates

That is my understanding, also.......we need mock convention experience, with hitlerian style tatctics put on us by the mock establishment actors :)

That is an EXCELLENT idea! Each state should hold mock conventions, preferably at several locations around the state, as an educational tool for RP supporters. Would be great practice for all of us.
 
It appears that the delegate count will take a long time. Only the preapproved cramdown slate candidates were printed on the ballot. Any other nominee was listed on a projector and had to be written in. 1500, random order ballots will take a long time to count. It will probably be late afternoon or evening before the vote is counted.
 
It appears that the delegate count will take a long time. Only the preapproved cramdown slate candidates were printed on the ballot. Any other nominee was listed on a projector and had to be written in. 1500, random order ballots will take a long time to count. It will probably be late afternoon or evening before the vote is counted.

Huh. Should be interesting.
 
At least RP and Santorum supporters will know not to vote for the ones initially printed on there :)
 
Okay, so this is the next to the last time I'm going to sit on the edge of my chair refreshing the browsers if this kind of delay keeps happening, at least I think so. My old nerves can't take more than 12972.97 more hours of this! :)
 
2074yu4sw2.gif
 
Mod: This was posted in a Missouri thread when the caucus was shut down after repeated rules violations Rules violations can include refusal to COUNT the division of the vote so long as the vote isn't overwhelmingly clear visually. See discussion below:

Originally Posted by BKom
The chair clearly had this strategy planned out and that's why he didn't want a clear recording of it. I will repeat: I know a bit about party rules and Roberts Rules and they don't make any difference against this gambit. I would appreciate if there's some advice from a rules expert that will overcome the "deaf chair" maneuver. But I don't see how that's possible.
Originally Posted by LostNFoundNTx
It's addressed in (RONR (11th ed.) pp. 650-653). A member of the assembly can stand in place of the chair (without recognition of the chair) to take a vote if the chair chooses to ignore a non-dilatory point of order 3 times. If the entire room is quiet except for the presiding chair (who is ignoring the member) and the member taking a vote in his place, it's easy to simply listen to the person taking a vote in his place. What effectively happens is the chair, who is behaving out of order, is simply ignored by the members in the room while they vote to remove him.
 
Last edited:
it's nice and dark in there. wouldn't want to shine a light on any fraud now would we.
 
Eric ‏@Talking_Monkeys So... I'm lost. What time do we vote to legalize drugs again???

As soon as we get President Ron Paul moved into his new office :)

(and the prison gates will open and the oppressed will walk free in the land of the free)
 
Last edited:
Back
Top