NO ONE BUT PAUL. I Want A Committment

Captain Shays

Member
Joined
May 16, 2007
Messages
2,368
He doesn't need to run as a third party candidate IF we get a committment from EVERY Ron Paul supporter to vote for NO ONE BUT PAUL. If the establishment really believes in their engineered polls and they really believe that Ron Paul doesn't have that much support then why would they keep expressing so much concern about him running as a third party candidate? They KNOW how much power and influence Ron Paul has. Let me tell you guys something. The idea of minding our own business and not policing the world pre-dates apple pie and baseball as being part of the American mindset. Ron Paul has tapped into tha sentiment in a big way. The establishment KNOWS this and that is why they are trying to ignore him or make him look crazy. Their lie has gone on for many years but the people in their/our hearts also feel like Americans. The REAL Americans who want peace and prosperity and freedom.
We have a chance to hold the GOP hostage right now. We MUST promote NO ONE BUT PAUL. BY doing that we get Ron Paul off the hook of destroying the GOP's chances to beat Obama. It puts it on us instead and I don't think any of our hearts would be broken by them throwing spears at us for it.

This is the choice we give to the GOP establishment and we should shout it from the roof tops. We can give you the White House in 2012 IF you nominate Ron Paul. If you nominate him you will get ALL of his supporters, ALL of the Republicans MOST of the independents who are THE largest demographic, ALL of the anti war people who got Obama elected and ALL of the cross over Democrats.

If you don't nominate Ron Paul you'll get most of the Republican votes, a few of the independents, NONE of the anti war and very few of the cross over Democrats and NONE of the Ron Paul supporters.
In other words it's either Ron Paul or another 4 years of Obama. Choose.

And guess what? It's our choice to give them.

I will be asking for a committment from EVERYBODY to not only join the NO ONE BUT PAUL effort but to project it to EVERYONE and EVERYWHERE that you can to get this unified message out to the establishment


Last edited by Captain Shays; Today at 08:02 AM.
 
John Quincy Adams on U.S. Foreign Policy (1821)
October 2001
And now, friends and countrymen, if the wise and learned philosophers of the elder world, the first observers of mutation and aberration, the discoverers of maddening ether and invisible planets, the inventors of Congreve rockets and Shrapnel shells, should find their hearts disposed to enquire what has America done for the benefit of mankind?
Let our answer be this: America, with the same voice which spoke herself into existence as a nation, proclaimed to mankind the inextinguishable rights of human nature, and the only lawful foundations of government. America, in the assembly of nations, since her admission among them, has invariably, though often fruitlessly, held forth to them the hand of honest friendship, of equal freedom, of generous reciprocity.
She has uniformly spoken among them, though often to heedless and often to disdainful ears, the language of equal liberty, of equal justice, and of equal rights.
She has, in the lapse of nearly half a century, without a single exception, respected the independence of other nations while asserting and maintaining her own.
She has abstained from interference in the concerns of others, even when conflict has been for principles to which she clings, as to the last vital drop that visits the heart.
She has seen that probably for centuries to come, all the contests of that Aceldama the European world, will be contests of inveterate power, and emerging right.
Wherever the standard of freedom and Independence has been or shall be unfurled, there will her heart, her benedictions and her prayers be.
But she goes not abroad, in search of monsters to destroy.
She is the well-wisher to the freedom and independence of all.
She is the champion and vindicator only of her own.
She will commend the general cause by the countenance of her voice, and the benignant sympathy of her example.
She well knows that by once enlisting under other banners than her own, were they even the banners of foreign independence, she would involve herself beyond the power of extrication, in all the wars of interest and intrigue, of individual avarice, envy, and ambition, which assume the colors and usurp the standard of freedom.
The fundamental maxims of her policy would insensibly change from liberty to force....
She might become the dictatress of the world. She would be no longer the ruler of her own spirit....
[America's] glory is not dominion, but liberty. Her march is the march of the mind. She has a spear and a shield: but the motto upon her shield is, Freedom, Independence, Peace. This has been her Declaration: this has been, as far as her necessary intercourse with the rest of mankind would permit, her practice.
When John Quincy Adams served as U. S. Secretary of State, he delivered this speech to the U.S. House of Representatives on July 4, 1821, in celebration of American Independence Day.
 
I have always given it as my decided opinion that no nation had a right to inter-meddle in the internal concerns of another; and that, if this country could, consistent with its engagements, maintain a strict neutrality and thereby preserve peace. George Washington - Letter to James Monroe, August 25, 1796


Observe good faith and justice toward all nations. Cultivate peace and harmony with all. ...The nation which indulges toward another an habitual hatred or an habitual fondness is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its animosity or to its affection, either of which is sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its interest. George Washington - Farewell Address, September 17, 1797

Peace, commerce, and honest friendship with all nations, entangling alliances with none should be our motto. Thomas Jefferson - First Inaugural Address, March 4, 1801

If there be one principle more deeply rooted than any other in the mind of every American, it is that we should have nothing to do with conquest. Thomas Jefferson (1743-1826) Letter to William Short, 1791

We certainly cannot deny to other nations that principle whereon our own government is founded, that every nation has a right to govern itself internally under what forms it pleases, and to change these forms at its own will. Thomas Jefferson - To Thomas Pinckney, December 30, 1792

Europe, by her arms and by her negotiations, by force and by fraud, has extended her dominion over them all, Africa, Asia, an America have successively felt her domination. The superiority she has long maintained has tempted her to plume herself as the Mistress of the World, and to consider the rest of mankind as created for her benefit.*
Alexander Hamilton on Colonialism, The Federalist Papers 1787

My ardent desire is to keep the United States free from political connections with every other country, to see them independent of all and under the influence of none. George Washington (Letter to Patrick Henry, October 9, 1795)

We mistake the object of our government, if we hope or wish that it is to make us respectable abroad. Conquest or superiority among other powers is not or ought not ever to be the object of republican systems. Charles Pinckney (1757-1824) Constitutional Convention, June 25, 1787
 
Who has been here since the 2008 election meaning since the 2007 campaign? If you were here then you wittnessed the birth of the Tea Party Movement becuase it was born RIGHT HERE.
EVERYBODY KNOWS the influence of the Tea Party movement even though it has been subsequently hijacked. It was nonetheless highly influencial in the 2010 election.

The establishment KNOWS this. They KNOW what power we have therefore what power Ron Paul has.

Like I said in the launch post and how I qualified it with quotes from our founding fathers they also KNOW that Ron Paul taps into the MAJORITY who believe in our hearts that we should NOT continue to police the world and stick our noses into the business of other countries. We don't need to be well educated into the machinations of geopoltics or foreign policy or even the Constitution because as Americans WE KNOW IT IN OUR HEARTS. Nobody needs to convice us through propaganda to defend this country as evidenced after 911 when even people we thought to be weeny little liberals were on the same page as people we would think are war hawks. Let's go get the bad guys and kill them. But you do need to use lies and propaganda to convince us that going into a foreign country to kill people who have never attacked us or threatened us is "a noble cause".

Our GDP is around $14 TRILLION oer year and the military industrial complex comprises around 1/3 of that. So there are a lot of people who have a financial interest in keeping us in a constant state of conflict. We know that the bankers and the military industrial complex go hand in hand. We also know that the bankers through the Council on Foreign Relations started many years ago buying up all the major news papers and since then the radio and TV stations. Today the 5 largest media conglomerates are ALL owned by members of the CFR.

THIS is what we're up against little Ron Paul supporters.

As I say this I know that my launch post is really pointless. Why? Because as many of us already know there is no difference between CFR Democrats and CFR Republicans. THEY are "they". They ARE the establishment-our shadow government.
That said I stand by my opening post. NO ONE BUT PAUL.
 
Last edited:
No one but PAUL.

I can not, and WILL NOT support any other candidate who stands for the murder and torture of anyone.
 
There has been another thread about this and I don't want to steal your thunder with this thread. The other thread has inspired a lot of us but in my opinion not enough of us. But it did inspire me to realize that IF we can make a committment to vote for NO ONE BUT PAUL it will get Ron off the hook for ruining the neocon party's chances of beating Obama and will put it squarely on us.

In that other thread I posted a response to Sailingaway when she expressed concerns that by doing this, it will make the GOP hate us more and will make us look rude and like we're not real Republicans and that we don't support the GOP.
My response got a lot of positive feedback that was inspiring so I decided to post it here in hopes that it will dispell those concerns about us alienating the GOP


It sounds like you are blaming us for putting this wedge between us the the GOP. But THEY ignore our candidate. THEY called us terrorists, nut jobs, paulbots, childish, rowdy, immature, cheaters, liars, and just about everything else under the sun. THEY call our hero, our candidate who is a man of principle, honesty, integrity, intelligence "crazy old Ron" and "wrong Paul". THEY lied and lied and lied about the CPAC convention, the straw polls, the debate polls, his positions, his rhetoric and his philosophy.
Meanwhile THEY keep trying to shove THEIR chosen candidates down our throats who are globalist corporate controlled war mongers who send our kids into wars that have no legitimate value relative to our national security or protection of our liberty. THEY are the ones who keep passing law after law after law that take away more freedoms and threatened us with jail, fines, loss of job, loss of children and loss of property. THEIR economic philosophy is driving us into debt for the next three generations and it's THEIR chosen candidates who will continue in ALL of the above mentioned abuses.

So I for one am happy and proud to hold the GOP hostage. They WILL NOT get my vote with one of the candidates that they are trying to shove down my throat while THEY ignore THE ONE man who can turn this country back to it's Constitutional foundings and restore our liberties and stop the endless and senseless wars.

you know what I say to THEM? I am more loyal to my country than to ANY party.


(((((((NO ONE BUT PAUL))))))
 
Last edited:
I see one problem with this train of thought. Cnn, MsNBC, and CBS are all liberal news networks. They probably know how disenfranchised the media is making us feel. So what do they do? Make it worse. They want Obama re-elected. By ignoring Paul we throw it on Republicans only and that's a win for those networks. So while we might be able to change Fox New's coverage of us, we could actually make their coverage of us even worse.

One more note would be, as long as the media continues to say that Ron Paul is "unelectable" or "polling poorly" Republicans will continue to ignore his base. In their minds we are a select few thousand that flood online polls. As long as we have that status no one can take our "no one but Paul" plan seriously.

So our goal? Win Iowa and develop a path to the nomination without the media.
 
I see one problem with this train of thought. Cnn, MsNBC, and CBS are all liberal news networks. They probably know how disenfranchised the media is making us feel. So what do they do? Make it worse. They want Obama re-elected. By ignoring Paul we throw it on Republicans only and that's a win for those networks. So while we might be able to change Fox New's coverage of us, we could actually make their coverage of us even worse.

One more note would be, as long as the media continues to say that Ron Paul is "unelectable" or "polling poorly" Republicans will continue to ignore his base. In their minds we are a select few thousand that flood online polls. As long as we have that status no one can take our "no one but Paul" plan seriously.

So our goal? Win Iowa and develop a path to the nomination without the media.


Don't fall for the threat of obamas 2nd term. The republicrats have used this every damn election to get people to vote for a sap. That and if the republicans take the congress then in reality if paul does not win we would be better off with obama because it would devide washingtion for at lest 2 years.
 
I see one problem with this train of thought. Cnn, MsNBC, and CBS are all liberal news networks. They probably know how disenfranchised the media is making us feel. So what do they do? Make it worse. They want Obama re-elected. By ignoring Paul we throw it on Republicans only and that's a win for those networks. So while we might be able to change Fox New's coverage of us, we could actually make their coverage of us even worse.

One more note would be, as long as the media continues to say that Ron Paul is "unelectable" or "polling poorly" Republicans will continue to ignore his base. In their minds we are a select few thousand that flood online polls. As long as we have that status no one can take our "no one but Paul" plan seriously.

So our goal? Win Iowa and develop a path to the nomination without the media.
You do realize that the media bumped a total empty suit to the top of the polls, right? Herman Cain, complete with scandal baggage, does not have a campaign team, does not know anything about foreign policy, sat on the Kansas City board of counterfeiters, flip flops on every issue, is a poor speaker, and promises to raise everyone's taxes is polling above the most principled statesman to ever run for president. And you somehow think we can win without the media?

Seriously friend, the media could put OJ Simpson as the front-runner by next week if they wanted. The media picks the president... and they always have.

No One But Paul!!!
 
Last edited:
I won't vote for any of the republican candidates other than Ron Paul, its that simple.
 
OK The obvious. This last debate was one about foreign policy. Foreign policy can and usually does result in wars where people get killed. Sons who never come home to their parents. Husbands who never come home to their wives. Fathers who never again come home to their children. Yet out of the 535 elected members of Congress only three have children who are in the military yet they are the one's who send our fathers, husbands and sons into wars zones where they might get killed.
So what has the media done? They are trying to shove candidates down our throats who are more likely to send our sons, fathers and husbands to die while they are blacking out the ONE who will restrain himself in war.

Bottom line is that the media scumbags are highly complicit in the killing of countless American husbands, fathers, sons and brothers and countless numbers of people in other countries ALL of which NEVER attacked us, and NEVER threatened us.

These scumbags are trying to control the outcome of our elections. It's bad when they do this to the candidate that we support and we're all enraged by it but this is nothing new. They have done this FOR YEARS to third party candidates and other wise peace loving candidates.

The ONLY war we should wage right now is against the media in my opinion.
I think we all understand that there is a symbiotic relationship between the leaders in BOTH the major parties and the media. That old saying "Democrats and Republicans are just different sides of the same coin" is only partially true because that coin also has an edge.....the media. That is what gives certain candidates an edge over other candidates. The media can make or break ANY candidate that they want at the behest of the elites.

I am making a committment right here and right now. I WILL NOT VOTE FOR ANYONE BUT RON PAUL.
 
Last edited:
Oh hell, I don't think I need to make it any more clear, but just for those who might not have heard:

No One But Paul

No one but Paul will have my vote in 2012.

No. One.

Is that clear?

NO ONE!
 
SailingAway is a she?

:-)

There has been another thread about this and I don't want to steal your thunder with this thread. The other thread has inspired a lot of us but in my opinion not enough of us. But it did inspire me to realize that IF we can make a committment to vote for ON ONE BUT PAUL it will get Ron off the hook for ruining the neocon party's chances of beating Obama and will put it squarely on us.

In that other thread I posted a response to Sailingaway when she expressed concerns that by doing this, it will make the GOP hate us more and will make us look rude and like we're not real Republicans and that we don't support the GOP.
My response got a lot of positive feedback that was inspiring so I decided to post it here in hopes that it will dispell those concerns about us alienating the GOP


It sounds like you are blaming us for putting this wedge between us the the GOP. But THEY ignore our candidate. THEY called us terrorists, nut jobs, paulbots, childish, rowdy, immature, cheaters, liars, and just about everything else under the sun. THEY call our hero, our candidate who is a man of principle, honesty, integrity, intelligence "crazy old Ron" and "wrong Paul". THEY lied and lied and lied about the CPAC convention, the straw polls, the debate polls, his positions, his rhetoric and his philosophy.
Meanwhile THEY keep trying to shove THEIR chosen candidates down our throats who are globalist corporate controlled war mongers who send our kids into wars that have no legitimate value relative to our national security or protection of our liberty. THEY are the ones who keep passing law after law after law that take away more freedoms and threatened us with jail, fines, loss of job, loss of children and loss of property. THEIR economic philosophy is driving us into debt for the next three generations and it's THEIR chosen candidates who will continue in ALL of the above mentioned abuses.

So I for one am happy and proud to hold the GOP hostage. They WILL NOT get my vote with one of the candidates that they are trying to shove down my throat while THEY ignore THE ONE man who can turn this country back to it's Constitutional foundings and restore our liberties and stop the endless and senseless wars.

you know what I say to THEM? I am more loyal to my country than to ANY party.


(((((((NO ONE BUT PAUL))))))
 
Oh hell, I don't think I need to make it any more clear, but just for those who might not have heard:

No One But Paul

No one but Paul will have my vote in 2012.

No. One.

Is that clear?

NO ONE!

dlrmmg.jpg
 
Back
Top