No matter what you think of Bill Clinton, the man is flipping brilliant.

Because his supporters expect him to do things like that?
So in otherwords he is just plain stupid. In case you haven't figured it out 60 to 65% of just the republicans are not voting for Trump. As trump said himself he supporters would support him if he murdered somebody in the street. He isn't doing anything to expand his base except alienate his non base..
 
Because he isn't a politician and has shown he hits those who hit him. Not saying it wasn't stupid, because it was. But, he has shown that this is what he does.
If case you have forgotten Trump attacked Ron why back in CPAC of 2012. He has show very clearly to a large majority that he is small mean person that quite commonly get's by with treating people like dirt like cheating on his first wife.
 
So in otherwords he is just plain stupid.
OK
In case you haven't figured it out 60 to 65% of just the republicans are not voting for Trump. As trump said himself he supporters would support him if he murdered somebody in the street. He isn't doing anything to expand his base except alienate his non base..
I'm aware of the numbers.

I'm also aware that we have months to go.

I get the impression that Trump is doing what Trump thinks is best for his campaign, not to create a divide to ice it for Hillary. I could be wrong, but I would be surprised if that was proven to be true.
 
OK

I'm aware of the numbers.

I'm also aware that we have months to go.

I get the impression that Trump is doing what Trump thinks is best for his campaign, not to create a divide to ice it for Hillary. I could be wrong, but I would be surprised if that was proven to be true.
Then just on that he isn't fit to be president because that isn't even a politician thing. That is just plain decent human decorum which trump has none.
 
If case you have forgotten Trump attacked Ron why back in CPAC of 2012. He has show very clearly to a large majority that he is small mean person that quite commonly get's by with treating people like dirt like cheating on his first wife.

So, how does this relate to your OP?
 
So, how does this relate to your OP?
Because you said this.. "Because he isn't a politician and has shown he hits those who hit him." A clear implication that Rand deserved it because he attacked Trump first.

Trump attacked Rand because Trump he is a mean, small, vicious, man that doesn't give a shit if a democrat take the best senator out, because he is a fucking democrat.
 
Because you said this.. "Because he isn't a politician and has shown he hits those who hit him." A clear implication that Rand deserved it because he attacked Trump first.
Whether he deserved it or not, is not the issue. Trump had already shown that he only goes after those who go after him first.

Trump attacked Rand because Trump he is a mean, small, vicious, man that doesn't give a $#@! if a democrat take the best senator out, because he is a $#@!ing democrat.
No, because Rand drew first blood. If you recall, he didn't go after Cruz until Cruz went after him.
 
Also, Perot ran third party. Trump is running as a Republican. If Perot had run an insurgent campaign and taken the GOP nomination, there never would have been a President Clinton. Just like there will never be a President Hillary Clinton if Trump somehow manages to win the GOP nod.

Bill Clinton is still a good talker, but he's lost touch with modern events. The BLM thing would have been a brilliant move back in the 1990's when Clinton cleverly attacked the fringe crazies in his own party to make himself more appealing to moderates. But he doesn't get that the fringe crazies have won and they control the Democratic Party now.

Yea he is a good talker alright he and Newt Gingrich were cut out of the same cloth I think. I am surprised it took so long for the Crime Act to come up he did not handle that one well and he can't deny what it did to the hood I am glad to know the hood has not forgotten. I hope they won't forget or forgive and vote libertarian!
 
Whether he deserved it or not, is not the issue. Trump had already shown that he only goes after those who go after him first.


No, because Rand drew first blood. If you recall, he didn't go after Cruz until Cruz went after him.
Going after ron in early 2012 was way before. If Trump was attacking Ron he was attack Rand. Trump drew first blood.
 
Going after ron in early 2012 was way before. If Trump was attacking Ron he was attack Rand. Trump drew first blood.

I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I see Ron Paul and Rand Paul as two distinct human beings.
 
I guess we will have to agree to disagree. I see Ron Paul and Rand Paul as two distinct human beings.
And there fore your argument that Trump always attacks after being attacked is a joke. Trump attacked Ron when Ron was wining Iowa.
 
JZnIIJg.jpg

Who was the billionaire running against Hilary in 2008 when she lost to Obama?
 
No other person could have survived impeachment and two minority popular votes for president and 16 years later talks a democrat into running as a republican and long term splits the republican party to help his wife get elected. I wonder when the Perot connections to the Clintons will come out in history like they will with trump.
Bill read the republican electorate like no other politician in history in three elections now. 16 years of Clintons, wow.

I think this is absurd. Trump's ego is way too big to be part of some conspiracy to get Hillary elected. He wants to win. No doubt in my mind.
 
This meme didn't age well now did it?

Nope. Not to mention Perrot took slightly more votes from Clinton. If it hadn't been for Ross, Clinton would have had a bigger blowout. The Ross-gave-Clinton-the-win meme is used to scare Republicans into supporting neocons by shifting the blame from what a terrible candidate/person (?) Bush was.
 
Last edited:
Nope. Not to mention Perrot took slightly more votes from Clinton. If it hadn't been for Ross, Clinton would have had a bigger blowout. The Ross-gave-Clinton-the-win meme is used to scare Republicans into supporting neocons by shifting the blame from what a terrible candidate/person (?) Bush was.
What states did he take votes from Clinton in vs. Bush.
Bush threw the election on purpose and was good friends with the Klintons so it really doesn't matter.
Maybe Perot was just supposed to sour the public on 3rd parties for a generation, dropping out in the middle of the race and then jumping back in just before the election made a lot of people mad.
 
Back
Top