Ninth Circuit Throws Out Berkeley Ban on Gas Stoves

Joined
Aug 31, 2007
Messages
117,576
Ninth Circuit Throws Out Berkeley Ban on Gas Stoves

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/04/17/ninth-circuit-throws-out-berkeley-ban-on-gas-stoves/

JOEL B. POLLAK 17 Apr 2023

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit tossed a Berkeley, California, ban on gas stoves on Monday, saying that the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act preempted state and local authorities in regulating natural gas.

The Courthouse News Service reported:

The three-judge panel’s ruling reverses a federal judge’s dismissal of a lawsuit by the California Restaurant Association claiming the Energy Policy and Conservation Act preempts the San Francisco Bay Area city’s ban. The group said the ordinance would affect chefs’ ability to prepare food the way they are typically trained — using natural gas stoves.



[Donald Trump appointee U.S. Circuit Judge Patrick Bumatay wrote:] “States and localities can’t skirt the text of broad preemption provisions by doing indirectly what Congress says they can’t do directly. Berkeley can’t evade preemption by merely moving up one step in the energy chain and banning natural gas piping within those buildings.”

Carl DeMaio, chairman of Reform California, a conservative group, welcomed the ruling: ““We are thrilled with the 9th Circuit Court decision because this decision not only will apply to these mandates on new construction, but will also block the costly home retrofits that a number of cities and counties have been implementing.”

The Biden administration has taken steps toward eliminating gas stoves — though it briefly pretended otherwise — ostensibly to prevent asthma, but actually as part of a broader push against fossil fuel production.
 
Ninth Circuit Throws Out Berkeley Ban on Gas Stoves

https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2023/04/17/ninth-circuit-throws-out-berkeley-ban-on-gas-stoves/

JOEL B. POLLAK 17 Apr 2023

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit tossed a Berkeley, California, ban on gas stoves on Monday, saying that the federal Energy Policy and Conservation Act preempted state and local authorities in regulating natural gas.

The Courthouse News Service reported:

The three-judge panel’s ruling reverses a federal judge’s dismissal of a lawsuit by the California Restaurant Association claiming the Energy Policy and Conservation Act preempts the San Francisco Bay Area city’s ban. The group said the ordinance would affect chefs’ ability to prepare food the way they are typically trained — using natural gas stoves.



[Donald Trump appointee U.S. Circuit Judge Patrick Bumatay wrote:] “States and localities can’t skirt the text of broad preemption provisions by doing indirectly what Congress says they can’t do directly. Berkeley can’t evade preemption by merely moving up one step in the energy chain and banning natural gas piping within those buildings.”

Carl DeMaio, chairman of Reform California, a conservative group, welcomed the ruling: ““We are thrilled with the 9th Circuit Court decision because this decision not only will apply to these mandates on new construction, but will also block the costly home retrofits that a number of cities and counties have been implementing.”

The Biden administration has taken steps toward eliminating gas stoves — though it briefly pretended otherwise — ostensibly to prevent asthma, but actually as part of a broader push against fossil fuel production.

Well I'm glad the ban got thrown out. Kind of twisted that in this case Federal environment laws actually ended up protecting individual liberty because the local law went even further. Whoever the GOP nominee is (and I'm hoping against hope that it's Tim Scott) he needs to make Biden's proposed gas stove ban a major issue.
 
Well I'm glad the ban got thrown out. Kind of twisted that in this case Federal environment laws actually ended up protecting individual liberty because the local law went even further. Whoever the GOP nominee is (and I'm hoping against hope that it's Tim Scott) he needs to make Biden's proposed gas stove ban a major issue.

That was my first thought as well...they got it right for the wrong reasons.
 
I don't think these agencies should be dictating what is or is not acceptable.

Is this a favorable ruling? Should a city be able to decide what they want or should they be mandated by an alphabet agency that has not had any input from the people?
 
I'm not seeing any reason for celebration. If Berkeley wants to live in a socialist shithole, should they not be allowed to do so? This is a two edged sword and strong centralized government imposing it's will never makes me happy for any reason.


Maybe. But Marxists don’t have those concerns. It’s BAMN for them, now it will have to be BAMN for all.

I'm not sure what BAMN is but this sounds like what I was saying.
 
I'm not seeing any reason for celebration. If Berkeley wants to live in a socialist shithole, should they not be allowed to do so? This is a two edged sword and strong centralized government imposing it's will never makes me happy for any reason.

That is according to our principles...

"When I am weaker than you, I ask you for freedom because that is according to your principles; when I am stronger than you, I take away your freedom because that is according to my principles." -- Frank Herbert, Children of Dune

I'm not sure what BAMN is but this sounds like what I was saying.

BAMN = By Any Means Necessary. The ends justify the means. Part of the Marxist playbook. And relevant to Berkeley, it was also the name of an Antifa type organization in Berkeley, led by a Berkeley elementary school teacher.
 
To all:

Yes, it's a temporary, "Gaussian Victory" at best.

That's sometimes the best we can manage.

Maybe it will allow enough time to let a few more people figure out what is going on.
 
I also do not think a federal energy policy and conservation act has any authority whatsoever to ever ban me from using anything, or my community. How about they all fuck off .
 
Back
Top