Nick Fuentes @ Tucker Carlson.



The Charlie Kirk debacle is a prime example of why I call the crook Nuttyyahoo. He's insane and he's over the top. This Kirk business was designed to further the left/right divide, but they're being so cockeyed obvious that it's backfiring in a big way and making the Who First conversation happen at last.

It's like Nuttyyahoo is so arrogant and so mafia that he wants that message sent--once we sponsor you and spend the money we got from American taxpayers to make you famous, then we own you forevermore and the only way out of the Family is feet first. There's no quitting the Mafia.
 
Dave Smith | Tucker Carlson Responds to the Mob | Part Of The Problem 1323
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yaFAZiqV4AQ
{Dave Smith | 03 November 2025}

On this episode of Part Of The Problem, Dave is joined by Tucker Carlson! They talk about the heavy backlash from Tucker's interview with Nick Fuentes, the divide between people who support and oppose Israel in America, Ben Shapiro's past articles, and more.



Scott Horton on Tucker, Pat Buchanan, and Other Good Guys | Tom Woods Show #2707
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wskAmQPl66k
{TomWoodsTV | 07 November 2025}

The Tom Woods Show: Episode 2727

Tucker's recent interview with Dave Smith [see this post (quoted above) - OB] made perfectly clear how dishonest the campaign against him has been, led as it is by some of the worst, most bloodthirsty savages in America. Scott and I continue that conversation, and also discuss Pat Buchanan, the right's gatekeepers, Iran, and plenty more.

Guest's Website: Scott Horton Academy

 
Speaking only for myself, I don't think white people are "devils" or "subhuman" (though modern evolution and genetics do say Europeans are mixed with Neanderthal...but I'm a young earth creationist) nor do I think that they should "mostly" be put in prison.

Yeah, the evolution of white people is pretty sketchy...

 
That was a predictable edit.

They cannot televise the entire 6 minute segment beginning at 1:12:20.

Because it speaks to the core issue and is presented in a way which is difficult to discredit.

 
I don't care one bit that Carlson had Fuentes on his show. He can invite whoever the hell he wants.
 
Last edited:
 
:rolleyes: Right. You find ONE person without credentials to attack an entire thesis that he didn't come up with. Very scientific. :rolleyes:




I'm also a young earth creationist. But isn't the thesis you're talking about essentially a euphemistic way of saying that people with more Neanderthal DNA (which, if I understand correctly, is more prominent in east Asians than it is in Europeans) are more highly evolved than those with less of it?
 
I'm also a young earth creationist. But isn't the thesis you're talking about essentially a euphemistic way of saying that people with more Neanderthal DNA (which, if I understand correctly, is more prominent in east Asians than it is in Europeans) are more highly evolved than those with less of it?
That's the NEW thesis being promulgated from people who used to say the opposite. That's Neil Degrasse Tyson's point.

Edit: Bringing this back to the point I was making earlier, that's why racism, no matter how people try to dress it up, is bullshyt. Racists now call it "pattern recognition" until the pattern doesn't fit the narrative. Case in point Charlie Kirk claiming Justice Jackson is a "DEI hire" for no other reason than she supports DEI when her on paper credentianls (judicial experience, class ranking and school rankings) are all higher than Clarence Thomas.
 
Back
Top