NH 12/13 Insider Advantage: Romney 29% Gingrich 24% Paul 21% (Paul trails by 8%!)

[tremendoustie]

This is very good news, but it still says we're in 3rd place. Let's all work our @$$3$ off for the next three weeks to make it 1st.

 

[parocks]

Wins Males
Wins 18-29
Wins 30-45
Wins Independents

 

[LibertyDreckman]

This is very good news, but it still says we're in 3rd place. Let's all work our @$$3$ off for the next three weeks to make it 1st.

Statistical tie for 2nd!!

 

[hellsingfan]

You guys do remember that last time in NH there was hype that we would do good but we got pummeled. Take these polls with a grain of salt and work your butt off... Thats the only way we going to win.

 

[69360]

You guys do remember that last time in NH there was hype that we would do good but we got pummeled. Take these polls with a grain of salt and work your butt off... Thats the only way we going to win.

Ron's polling numbers are literally 3 times what they were in 2007 on this date, it's not hype, he's doing good. It's worth some excitement.

 

[hellsingfan]

Ron's polling numbers are literally 3 times what they were in 2007 on this date, it's not hype, he's doing good. It's worth some excitement.

Just saying, polls are no substitute. We should get excited when they are good but not let them go to our heads.

 

[TheDrakeMan]

The polls are accurate, always have been. But in 2007/2008 we had a weird belief that all the polls were biased and the polling companies were out to get us. Now we know better.

 

[hellsingfan]

Didn't we get half of what we polled last time in NH? I don't remember but I really thought we would do good but didn't last time. Even CNN was sayin' it too

 

[fatjohn]

And after Iowa, Huntsman will get no news. He will likely lose some of his voters. And Paul is likely to pick those up.

 

[bluesc]

This is awesome

 

[South Park Fan]

Didn't we get half of what we polled last time in NH? I don't remember but I really thought we would do good but didn't last time. Even CNN was sayin' it too

We got slightly lower than the polls predicted in 2008. Makes sense because New Hampshire is not a caucus state. However, we wouldn't want to make that same mistake that Obama made four years ago and assume that a bump out of Iowa will necessarily translate into a New Hampshire victory.

 

[mwkaufman]

We got slightly lower than the polls predicted in 2008. Makes sense because New Hampshire is not a caucus state. However, we wouldn't want to make that same mistake that Obama made four years ago and assume that a bump out of Iowa will necessarily translate into a New Hampshire victory.

There is almost 8% undecided in the final polling average, not exceeding your poll numbers indicates you failed to energize your supporters or attract undecideds. Polls indicated it was a race between McCain and Romney, so they attracted the undecideds, people want to influence the race.

 

[Omnica]

Only 20 dems sample size, never mind about that.

Still, doesn't anybody know how RP could get 1.5% of 6 black guys? Or a decimal fraction of 20 dems?

Has anyone heard a satisfactory reason for these two figures?

 

[Omnica]

man if we can get a one-two punch with wins in iowa and nh the establishment will be devastated and scrambling.

Why do you believe that? They will simply spin, spin, spin...deny, deny...and marginalize while rigging the votes.

 

[Omnica]

We got slightly lower than the polls predicted in 2008. Makes sense because New Hampshire is not a caucus state. However, we wouldn't want to make that same mistake that Obama made four years ago and assume that a bump out of Iowa will necessarily translate into a New Hampshire victory.

What about the corrupt Secretary of State of NH, Bill Gardner? On video Breaking the law in 2008 primary...

 

[Simple]

Huntsman looks like he's doing good in NH, its the first poll I've seen that put him in double digits.

 

[mwkaufman]

Huntsman looks like he's doing good in NH, its the first poll I've seen that put him in double digits.

It's his fourth, but I think he's rubbing up against his ceiling of 11% of NH primary voters.

 

[parocks]

We got slightly lower than the polls predicted in 2008. Makes sense because New Hampshire is not a caucus state. However, we wouldn't want to make that same mistake that Obama made four years ago and assume that a bump out of Iowa will necessarily translate into a New Hampshire victory.

I don't know that Obama assumed that NH was a victory after Iowa. He knew that Clinton had Whouley on the ground in NH.

 

[sailingaway]

bump

 

[ross11988]

We got slightly lower than the polls predicted in 2008. Makes sense because New Hampshire is not a caucus state. However, we wouldn't want to make that same mistake that Obama made four years ago and assume that a bump out of Iowa will necessarily translate into a New Hampshire victory.

I think also people lost hope in Ron Paul after placing 5th in Iowa.