==========>> | NewtExposed.com | <<==========
- Thread starter Joe3113
- Start date
Razmear
Member
- Joined
- May 21, 2007
- Messages
- 4,023
jay_dub
Member
- Joined
- Nov 16, 2011
- Messages
- 1,162
Newt's "Conservative Futurist" baloney should be enough to sink him completely. Gingrich is a dangerous hypocrite and not a Conservative at all. Someone needs to wake the sheep up on this. I say it should be Ron Paul!!
Think of it like this. RP is getting ignored on his policies. Blowing Newt up onstage in a debate would absolutely give him the attention he deserves and show him to be the true Conservative.
Here is just a little on Newt's philosophy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In 1994, Gingrich described himself as “a conservative futurist.” He said that those who were trying to define him should look no further than The Third Wave, a 1980 book written by Alvin Toffler. The book describes our society as entering a post-industrial phase in which abortion, homosexuality, promiscuity, and divorce are perfectly normal, even virtuous. Toffler penned a letter to America’s “founding parents,” in which he said: “The system of government you fashioned, including the very principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented — a democracy for the 21st century.” He went on to describe our constitutional system as one that “served us so well for so long, and that now must, in its turn, die and be replaced.”
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index...newt-gingrich-the-establishments-conservative
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And then there's always Newt's record. Voting for NAFTA and GATT, costing American jobs and yielding sovereignty.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In 1993 New Gingrich not only voted for the ‘job destroying’ North American Free Trade Agreement, (NAFTA) but he was also instrumental in getting enough Republican support to pass the bill. In 1994, as the House Minority Whip, Newt voted to support the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) with his vote on GATT! In his position as Minority Whip, he had the power to postpone the vote on GATT, The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, until it could have been modified or defeated in the House, but he chose instead to let the bill pass in a Lame Duck session of Congress! Newt voted in favor of The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade which subjects Americans to the international authority and the regulation of the World Trade Organization. See additional link.
The United States Constitution states in Article 1 Section 8 that “Congress shall have the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations.” (not the WTO) Note: It doesn’t say that Congress has the right to delegate that authority away to anyone else! But Congress has abdicated their role and subrogated their authority to the World Trade Organization with the passage of GATT, and with the instrumental help of Newt Gingrich! Prior to orchestrating the vote in the House, in which Newt himself voted in a favor of surrendering American sovereignty on matters having to do with foreign trade to the WTO, Newt Gingrich testified in front of the House Ways and Means Committee. In his testimony in 1994 he said , "We need to be honest about the fact that we are transferring from the United States at a practical level, significant authority to a new organization…This is not just another trade agreement. This is doing something which twice, once in the 1940’s and once in the 1950’s, the US Congress rejected…It is a very big transfer of power.” It sounds to me like he knew exactly what he was proposing, and in spite of his warning, he still arranged for the vote on GATT, he still voted in favor of it, and as much as anyone else, Newt Gingrich bears the responsibility for transferring American sovereignty on matters having to do with foreign trade to an international authority! This betrayal was a direct assault on our Constitution!
http://www.lessgovisthebestgov.com/Newt-Gingrich-Candidate-President-Republican-Primary.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
C'Mon, Ron, tell the American People the truth about Gingrich. You'll be glad you did!!
Think of it like this. RP is getting ignored on his policies. Blowing Newt up onstage in a debate would absolutely give him the attention he deserves and show him to be the true Conservative.
Here is just a little on Newt's philosophy.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In 1994, Gingrich described himself as “a conservative futurist.” He said that those who were trying to define him should look no further than The Third Wave, a 1980 book written by Alvin Toffler. The book describes our society as entering a post-industrial phase in which abortion, homosexuality, promiscuity, and divorce are perfectly normal, even virtuous. Toffler penned a letter to America’s “founding parents,” in which he said: “The system of government you fashioned, including the very principles on which you based it, is increasingly obsolete, and hence increasingly, if inadvertently, oppressive and dangerous to our welfare. It must be radically changed and a new system of government invented — a democracy for the 21st century.” He went on to describe our constitutional system as one that “served us so well for so long, and that now must, in its turn, die and be replaced.”
http://www.thenewamerican.com/index...newt-gingrich-the-establishments-conservative
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
And then there's always Newt's record. Voting for NAFTA and GATT, costing American jobs and yielding sovereignty.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
In 1993 New Gingrich not only voted for the ‘job destroying’ North American Free Trade Agreement, (NAFTA) but he was also instrumental in getting enough Republican support to pass the bill. In 1994, as the House Minority Whip, Newt voted to support the creation of the World Trade Organization (WTO) with his vote on GATT! In his position as Minority Whip, he had the power to postpone the vote on GATT, The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, until it could have been modified or defeated in the House, but he chose instead to let the bill pass in a Lame Duck session of Congress! Newt voted in favor of The General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade which subjects Americans to the international authority and the regulation of the World Trade Organization. See additional link.
The United States Constitution states in Article 1 Section 8 that “Congress shall have the power to regulate commerce with foreign nations.” (not the WTO) Note: It doesn’t say that Congress has the right to delegate that authority away to anyone else! But Congress has abdicated their role and subrogated their authority to the World Trade Organization with the passage of GATT, and with the instrumental help of Newt Gingrich! Prior to orchestrating the vote in the House, in which Newt himself voted in a favor of surrendering American sovereignty on matters having to do with foreign trade to the WTO, Newt Gingrich testified in front of the House Ways and Means Committee. In his testimony in 1994 he said , "We need to be honest about the fact that we are transferring from the United States at a practical level, significant authority to a new organization…This is not just another trade agreement. This is doing something which twice, once in the 1940’s and once in the 1950’s, the US Congress rejected…It is a very big transfer of power.” It sounds to me like he knew exactly what he was proposing, and in spite of his warning, he still arranged for the vote on GATT, he still voted in favor of it, and as much as anyone else, Newt Gingrich bears the responsibility for transferring American sovereignty on matters having to do with foreign trade to an international authority! This betrayal was a direct assault on our Constitution!
http://www.lessgovisthebestgov.com/Newt-Gingrich-Candidate-President-Republican-Primary.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
C'Mon, Ron, tell the American People the truth about Gingrich. You'll be glad you did!!
Working Poor
Member
- Joined
- Feb 15, 2008
- Messages
- 10,985
that's what I am talking about.
Paulatized
Member
- Joined
- May 2, 2008
- Messages
- 1,079
That is a great site. Just what I've been wishing for! +rep to you.
LandonCook
Member
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,307
Bump!
sillvergirl
Member
- Joined
- Dec 9, 2007
- Messages
- 122
Joe 3113, Thank you for making that video and also the video segments with captions. I posted these resources on a "general interest" message board earlier today
and got more than 2500 views for the cause! RON PAUL 2012 !
and got more than 2500 views for the cause! RON PAUL 2012 !
king_nothing_
Member
- Joined
- Jun 11, 2011
- Messages
- 475
Great site. Some suggestions:
Remove the "almost hugged him" part of the Newt-Kerry section. I'm not familiar with the incident, but reading the source, it (to my surprise) seems to actually be meant literally. It does not come off that way, though. It comes off as figurative and unprofessional.
In your mention of the Lautenberg Gun Ban, add a brief description of what exactly it did.
Remove the "almost hugged him" part of the Newt-Kerry section. I'm not familiar with the incident, but reading the source, it (to my surprise) seems to actually be meant literally. It does not come off that way, though. It comes off as figurative and unprofessional.
In your mention of the Lautenberg Gun Ban, add a brief description of what exactly it did.
GeorgiaAvenger
Member
- Joined
- Sep 22, 2011
- Messages
- 4,945
Needs to mention Newt's support of the Mexican bailout
robert9712000
Member
- Joined
- Mar 2, 2008
- Messages
- 726
The Paul campaign needs this video brought to attention,itd be great to take clips for ads or for talking points for Ron against Newt in debates
tremendoustie
Member
- Joined
- Nov 11, 2007
- Messages
- 6,809
There's also notonewt.com btw -- it's different information, and a different presentation style, which might be more effective in some circumstances -- for example if you're debating someone specifically about Newt's voting record.
newtexposed is great as well -- just see what works best for you
newtexposed is great as well -- just see what works best for you
Last edited:
Similar threads
