[NEW VIDEO] Comparison of media treatment of Iowa Caucus 2008 and Iowa Caucus 2012

[gjdavis60]

Great job. Spread this around!

 

[Agorism]

LOL

I wish more of the "journalists" would see this video

 

[Joe3113]

I added a significantly shorter version in the OP.

 

[RonRules]

This is an extremely important video. Use the shorter version (#2) and broadcast this everywhere.

The MSM's hypocrisy is so clear.

 

[IDefendThePlatform]

Great video, I'd prob use a different title though. I feel dirty tweeting Iowa doesn't matter.

 

[Joe3113]

Great video, I'd prob use a different title though. I feel dirty tweeting Iowa doesn't matter.

What then?

 

[Hook]

Make sure to send this to Jon Stewart. He will probably make his own version after Iowa.

 

[KramerDSP]

I love this!!!!! Spread this viral around the world!!!

 

[KramerDSP]

BUMP! This video MUST go viral around the world. We the People must be awoken to the sham that is the Old Media.

 

[Joe3113]

I love this!!!!! Spread this viral around the world!!!

I'm not a good video spreader. That's what I really need you folks for.

I'm not on any social networking etc.

 

[ropo]

The second half of that video needs a laugh track

 

[KramerDSP]

I'm not a good video spreader. That's what I really need you folks for.

I'm not on any social networking etc.

As long as this stays on the front pahe, it eventually goes viral. But you may want to post it on DailyPaul too. Brilliant job. I did rip it to add captions on my channel (see my sig) but gave you full credit.

 

[Fredom101]

Obama looks 10 years younger in that vid!

 

[Emerick]

Again, I think the first part is too long. Don't put so much of Huckabee. After all, he LOST the nomination. So, just point out how the media felt it was important, how he did it too and how Obama also thought the exact same thing. You don't need to focus on someone who won Iowa and lost the nomination.

 

[muh_roads]

Send this to Jon Stewart. Tweet that shit or whatever it is u guys do.

 

[Joe3113]

Again, I think the first part is too long. Don't put so much of Huckabee. After all, he LOST the nomination. So, just point out how the media felt it was important, how he did it too and how Obama also thought the exact same thing. You don't need to focus on someone who won Iowa and lost the nomination.

Huckabee won several states and got something like 3 million votes.

They are not treating Ron Paul like someone who can make that happen.

My point is, they made a stink about Huckabee, who was doing worse than RP in NH.

 

[Emerick]

Huckabee won several states and got something like 3 million votes.

They are not treating Ron Paul like someone who can make that happen.

My point is, they made a stink about Huckabee, who was doing worse than RP in NH.

I know. I'm not saying to get ALL of Huckabee off. No, I'm saying it can be shortened a bit. We must realize this: if we can deliver the same message with the same powerfullness, it's better to do it as short as possible, because some people will just not see it. Even if it's a 2 minutes thing, if we can reduce it to 1 minute it's better, of course, as long as we can mantain the same effectiveness in making our point.

That's why I'm saying. Maybe try to reduce it and let people see it - if it's not much trouble, of course. Again, I congratulate you for your job, which is AWESOME.

 

[Joe3113]

Again, I think the first part is too long. Don't put so much of Huckabee. After all, he LOST the nomination. So, just point out how the media felt it was important, how he did it too and how Obama also thought the exact same thing. You don't need to focus on someone who won Iowa and lost the nomination.

You have a point yeah, but again, Huckabee won several states. My point is more that if Huckabee was given a chance and media coverage, Ron Paul also deserves it.

Maybe I'll make one without Huckabee. In fact I will now.

 

[Emerick]

You have a point yeah, but again, Huckabee won several states. My point is more that if Huckabee was given a chance and media coverage, Ron Paul also deserves it.

Maybe I'll make one without Huckabee. In fact I will now.

I think it would be better to have just a very little bit of Huckabee, so people remember of that, but just don't put it a lot. Maybe give him at most 3 seconds. It would be enough.

Just one more suggestion: try to put some coverage from 2012 saying how Iowa is crucial before Ron took the lead. It would make the point more forcefully.

 

[seeknshare]

http://www.dailypaul.com/189832/iow...-matter-after-dr-paul-wins-it#comment-2061244