New Member/ News Sources?

[Slutter McGee]

Sure it is. A pretty good one too, with a staff of decent writers.

They broke the MIAC story, among other things and link to MSM stories daily.

Actually I agree. I have found lots of news on infowars that I have not seen other places. I think it is one of the best sites out there for pointing out government abuse.

Now granted I don't always agree with the conclusions drawn by infowars when analyzing that news. But it is still a good site.

Slutter McGee

 

[Anti Federalist]

Actually I agree. I have found lots of news on infowars that I have not seen other places. I think it is one of the best sites out there for pointing out government abuse.

Now granted I don't always agree with the conclusions drawn by infowars when analyzing that news. But it is still a good site.

Slutter McGee

Well, I'll be damned, will wonders never cease? LoL

 

[pcosmar]

Sure it is. A pretty good one too, with a staff of decent writers.

They broke the MIAC story, among other things and link to MSM stories daily.

Didn't they break the American Police Force/Hardin Mt. Prison story too?
If they did not break it , they certainly uncovered several unsettling connections.

 

[Anti Federalist]

Didn't they break the American Police Force/Hardin Mt. Prison story too?
If they did not break it , they certainly uncovered several unsettling connections.

IIRC they sure did.

 

[Pericles]

I have seen most of what I would suggest already suggested so all I am left with is to welcome you to the forums so welcome aboard.

That ^^^^ and +1 more for Freedom Watch.

 

[Teaser Rate]

Sure it is. A pretty good one too, with a staff of decent writers.

They broke the MIAC story, among other things and link to MSM stories daily.

Actually I agree. I have found lots of news on infowars that I have not seen other places. I think it is one of the best sites out there for pointing out government abuse.

Now granted I don't always agree with the conclusions drawn by infowars when analyzing that news. But it is still a good site.

Slutter McGee

Here's a screenshot taken from today's front page:

Where that picture links to:

The powerful tsunami that today slammed into Japan’s eastern coast comes just two days after warnings that the movement of the moon could trigger unpredictable events on Earth.

Astrologers predicted that on March 19 – a week tomorrow – the so-called ‘supermoon’ will be closer to Earth than at any time since 1992, just 221,567 miles away, and that its gravitational pull will bring chaos to Earth.

Others on the Internet have predicted it will cause further catastrophes such as volcanic eruptions and earthquakes.

Coming just three weeks after the quake which devastated Christchurch in New Zealand killing hundreds, this latest disaster will only add fuel to their fire.

When you have stories which lend legitimacy to astrology being a legitimate science on your front page, you lose the right to be called a news site.

 

[Anti Federalist]

When you have stories which lend legitimacy to astrology being a legitimate science on your front page, you lose the right to be called a news site.

LoL.

Go read the UK Daily Mail article that is linking to.

It shoots the ideas of "astrologer" Richard Nolle down.

However, scientists dismiss this as utter nonsense and that although it makes a good photo opportunity for astronomers it has no impact on Earth.

Dr David Harland, space historian and author, said: 'It's possible that the moon may be a kilometre or two closer to Earth than normal at a perigee, but it's an utterly insignificant event.'

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...se-todays-natural-disaster.html#ixzz1GM4cVVpT

But, whatever, read whatever you like.

 

[jtyr8nt93]

I guess I'm overwhelmed because there is so many news out there. Viewer-contributed news is relatively new in this century. There is this desire of mine to want to find everything there is to know. I WAS A SOMEWHAT LAZY GUY WHO DIDN'T REALLY CARE FOR CURRENT EVENTS, AND NOW THAT I WANT TO PAY ATTENTION, IT FEELS THAT I HAVE TO PLAY CATCH UP.

Anyone have an opinion on british sources like BBC, guardian, dailytelegraph, and such? It seems that a lot of my friends tune it to that rather than American News Sources?

Any good sites that have news sources thrown together? What of wiki news?

 

[matt0611]

My favorite trusted information resources:

http://www.lewrockwell.com/
http://mises.org/
http://www.foxbusiness.com/on-air/freedom-watch/index.html
http://stossel.blogs.foxbusiness.com/
http://www.foxbusiness.com/on-air/stossel/index.html
http://www.schiffradio.com/
http://www.youtube.com/user/SchiffReport
http://www.dailypaul.com/
http://www.zerohedge.com/
http://www.thenewamerican.com/
http://reason.tv/
http://www.campaignforliberty.com/

No need to get overwhelmed though.

I also check out what the more mainstream news are saying just to keep up with them(CNN, FOX, MSNBC, NYT, BBC etc)

 

[jtyr8nt93]

I guess it is important to keep up with msm if just for headlines and for what the 'others' are saying

Trying not to be overwhelmed.