Austrian Econ Disciple
Member
- Joined
- Sep 18, 2009
- Messages
- 8,264
September 22. 2012 10:12PM
Juror says religion not a factor in nullification decision
By SHAWNE K. WICKHAM
New Hampshire Sunday News
http://www.unionleader.com/article/20120923/NEWS03/709239922
^
Yes, the article claims that is the judges instructions, unless I am missing something. That really excites me as that goes further than I thought I judge would be willing to do. I mean, that is (in meaning) the opposite of a judges instructions in CA cases. Seriously, if instructions like that became the norm, it would completely change the nature of criminal courts. Maybe some day it will become common in both New Hampshire and other places.
That used to be the common, indeed, traditional instructions in court. Judges are not supreme - the jury is. It really is one of the last lines of defense against tyranny, used extensively in our early history (Hence the King dismissing jury trials being one of the key issues in the Declaration). A welcome sign it is now returning. Bodes well.
For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:
I wonder why that would be....

Last edited: