New Hampshire Jury Acquits Pot-Growing Rastafarian

September 22. 2012 10:12PM
Juror says religion not a factor in nullification decision
By SHAWNE K. WICKHAM
New Hampshire Sunday News
http://www.unionleader.com/article/20120923/NEWS03/709239922




^
Yes, the article claims that is the judges instructions, unless I am missing something. That really excites me as that goes further than I thought I judge would be willing to do. I mean, that is (in meaning) the opposite of a judges instructions in CA cases. Seriously, if instructions like that became the norm, it would completely change the nature of criminal courts. Maybe some day it will become common in both New Hampshire and other places.

That used to be the common, indeed, traditional instructions in court. Judges are not supreme - the jury is. It really is one of the last lines of defense against tyranny, used extensively in our early history (Hence the King dismissing jury trials being one of the key issues in the Declaration). A welcome sign it is now returning. Bodes well.

For depriving us in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

I wonder why that would be....:rolleyes:
 
Last edited:
Another Union Leader article on the case. As usual, I only posted several highlights from the article. Click on the link to read the whole article.

September 23. 2012 12:12AM
Lawyers: 'Nullify' to be common refrain in criminal court cases
By SHAWNE K. WICKHAM
New Hampshire Sunday News
http://www.unionleader.com/article/20120923/NEWS03/709239880

Criminal defense attorneys predict New Hampshire jurors routinely will be told they have the right to find someone innocent even if the state proves its case because New Hampshire has passed what appears to be the nation's first “jury nullification” law.

Chuck Temple is a professor at the University of New Hampshire School of Law, where he is director of the criminal practice clinic. In his 27 years of practice, he said, he has always asked judges to instruct juries about nullification — but has never had a judge do so.

Temple said the new law, which takes effect Jan. 1, “changes the landscape of how criminal cases will be argued.”

Before, he said, “in the vast majority of criminal cases, there would be no arguments regarding jury nullification. ... Now, it's going to be an everyday occurrence in criminal jury trials.”

The language of the new law is “rather inartful,” never actually mentioning nullification, Temple said. Still, he expects defense lawyers will start telling jurors about it right away; he plans to raise it in a trial set to start Monday in Merrimack County Superior Court.

“I wouldn't be doing my job if I didn't,” he said. “It's just another seed I can plant in their minds in terms of what the fair thing to do is in a criminal case.”

Under the New Hampshire Bar Association's Criminal Jury Instruction guidelines, here's what judges may instruct jurors: “Even if you find that the State has proven each and every element of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt, you may still find the defendant not guilty if you have a conscientious feeling that a not guilty verdict would be a fair result in this case.”

Jury nullification is “a historical prerogative of the jury,” but that “does not mean that a jury must be informed by the judge of that power,” the guidelines note. Such instruction is “best given only when it is requested by a defendant or when the nature of a particular case otherwise warrants it.”

As of the new year, however, defense attorneys here can bring it up themselves. “It's a good tool, and it's been a long time coming,” Sisti said.

Dick Marple, a former Republican representative from Hooksett, is the state contact for the Fully Informed Jury Association, which promotes jury nullification.

Marple said New Hampshire is the first state to pass such a statute, a step he sees as “restoring a little justice to the system.”

“Because the jury is the conscience of the community,” he said.
 
A similar thing happened in NJ. A judge is still allowed to throw you in jail for mentioning jury nullification in NJ but the judge didn't stop the defendant until after he mentioned the topic. I love to see this spreading. This reminds me how the NH open government law passed in NH and spread to OK. I love to see liberty spread and I love that my friends and I are a small part of it. You are welcome to come to NH and help free your former state by freeing NH.

Jury Acquits NJWeedman In Marijuana Distribution Case
By Steve Elliott
Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 12:20 pm
http://www.tokeofthetown.com/2012/10/jury_acquits_njweedman_in_marijuana_distribution_c.php
 
A similar thing happened in NJ. A judge is still allowed to throw you in jail for mentioning jury nullification in NJ but the judge didn't stop the defendant until after he mentioned the topic. I love to see this spreading. This reminds me how the NH open government law passed in NH and spread to OK. I love to see liberty spread and I love that my friends and I are a small part of it. You are welcome to come to NH and help free your former state by freeing NH.

Jury Acquits NJWeedman In Marijuana Distribution Case
By Steve Elliott
Thursday, October 18, 2012 at 12:20 pm
http://www.tokeofthetown.com/2012/10/jury_acquits_njweedman_in_marijuana_distribution_c.php

More good news.
 
More good news.

Yes, yes it is!

I saw this on Facebook. https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?...a.98604930780.123439.657525780&type=1&theater

522791_10151257296605781_894908129_n.jpg
 
Last edited:
Back
Top