FSP-Rebel
Mr. Republitarian
- Joined
- May 19, 2007
- Messages
- 11,528
As has been discussed on this forum, all too many times, NH is not the free/Libertarian state some choose to paint it. It was co-opted by Massholes and RINOs a long time ago. NH is so far down on the list it is not even worth discussing where it places...
There are those on this forum who will continue to beat the drum on NH in the face of the facts/reality. They have their own agenda for doing this...
While it has been attempted by those with a hardon for NH and the FSPers who are attempting to do something productive, it has never been finalized that NH isn't the most libertarian state. Key word is most. There is no such thing as a pure libertarian state, such would be an oxymoron. Next, I'd like to take a look at the so-called facts that have been cited regarding NH ranking so low in economic conservatism. Can you explain to me how a state with no income or general sales tax can rank as low as has been offered? I'd expect that lack of understanding from a left winger, not someone on this forum. On the other hand, I have provided a study with all the stats needed to prove my point. I'll just assume that some still haven't taken a look at it.
Not to say that there haven't been people that move from Mass to NH, but reports show that the majority of those movers tend to be more conservative. Most of them settle in south central and southeast NH. If you look up the state reps from that southern strip, you'll find that the vast majority of them are republicans, many of which are libertarian leaning. Besides, NH has extremely chilled gun laws, no mandatory car insurance, and no seat belt nor helmet laws.
I don't go around actively disparaging anyone wanting to move to where ever they want but there's nothing wrong with laying out the facts and letting people to decide where the best places to live are from a liberty perspective. Yet, whenever this type of discussion comes up, it's the same old tactics and talking points being spewed in the face of clear evidence indicating otherwise. Just the way the thread is titled shows the offensive (read: offense) theme to this thread. The libertarianism of a state can't merely be judged by a meetup group or donations to Ron Paul. Heck, the man even announced his campaign from the NH liberty forum back in '07 over and above endorsing the FSP.
Lastly, the FSP as an entity doesn't endorse candidates nor particular forms of activism. The statement of intent on the website speaks for itself and you don't have to be an anarchist to be a part of it. They just tend to be more visible in creating controversy. The political side operates in a more subdued manner. And as I've mentioned in other threads, as of this last election, over 30% of the state reps are libertarian-republicans and the state senate has seen a major improvement as well. I just wonder what the average percentage of l-republican reps are in other states.