New Hampshire bill HB1273 makes the case for open source technology

donnay

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
42,534
New Hampshire bill HB1273 makes the case for open source technology

Citizens are urged to get behind it.

By Didi Rankovic

The US state of New Hampshire has been at the forefront of legislating in favor of “people-friendly” technologies like cryptocurrencies/blockchain before, so it’s not surprising that it is expected to imminently start considering incorporating free and open source software, i.e., software freedom principles, into law.

According to Libreboot – a free software project whose main goal is to “liberate” computer firmware contained in a machine’s BIOS – considers the planned January 11 reading of New Hampshire’s bill HB1273 a major event in the history of the free software movement, and, from the legislative point of view, one of global importance as far as official adoption of software freedom policies and philosophies goes.

The changes proposed in New Hampshire are indeed unusual in the world of lawmakers who are more often than not poorly educated, technology-wise, and poorly aware of the consequences closed, proprietary systems have on the economy and society.

If passed, the bill would see to it that state-run websites stop serving JavaScript (which is considered non-free), a Libreboot blog post said; there will further be an oversight commission set up to monitor how free software is used by state agencies.

Persons put on trial would have the right to audit the source code “of any proprietary software that collects evidence against them,” while state agencies would be banned from buying non-free software if free alternatives are available.

Among the many important proposed provisions is that which bans state agencies from using proprietary software – and Libreboot adds, “maybe this could include schools, in the future!”

And speaking of education, the blog post makes sure to stress the difference between (free) and open source, and proprietary, closed source, i.e., non-free software. It is stressed that the best way to refer to the former is free software, where “free” refers to, “free as in freedom.” Citizens are urged to support this upcoming New Hampshire bill.

The free and open source tech movement has always been about more than the ability to control, audit and share code; it is a way of thinking strongly aligned with others that value freedom and choice, as a path towards a truly equitable society that encourages critical thinking, especially in a era where technology reigns supreme in all aspects of life.
https://reclaimthenet.org/new-hampshire-bill-hb1273-makes-the-case-for-open-source-technology/
 
If passed, the bill would see to it that state-run websites stop serving JavaScript (which is considered non-free)

There are a lot of good ones for wanting state-run websites to not serve javascript, but javascript being "non-free" is not one of them.

Javascript (or more broadly, ECMAScript) is an open standard that is ran by ECMAScript and the W3C
 
There are a lot of good ones for wanting state-run websites to not serve javascript, but javascript being "non-free" is not one of them.

Javascript (or more broadly, ECMAScript) is an open standard that is ran by ECMAScript and the W3C

The reporter got it wrong. They want to ban the non-free implementations. The libreboot blog that I believe she is citing says:

What’s happening in New Hampshire?

An important bill is being proposed in New Hampshire, which would enshrine much of what we know as Free Software into law. Here is the proposed bill, technically named “HB1273”:
https://gencourt.state.nh.us/bill_status/legacy/bs2016/billText.aspx?sy=2022&id=1363&txtFormat=html

You can read it for yourself, but here is a paraphrasing of what it proposes:

  • Specifically bans state-run websites from serving non-free javascript to clients
  • Creates a commission to provide oversight, watching the use of Free Software by state agencies
  • Bans state agencies from using proprietary software - maybe this could include schools, in the future!
  • If a person is tried in a criminal case, they have the right to audit the source code of any proprietary software that collects evidence against them
  • Encourages data portability (able to transfer data from one program to another)
  • Bans certain non-compete clauses and NDAs (non-disclosure agreements) pertaining to Free Software projects
  • Bans state/local law enforcement from assisting with the enforcement of copyright claims against Free Software projects
  • Bans state agencies from purchasing non-free software if free software exists, for a given task
https://libreboot.org/news/usa-libre.html
 
Back
Top