Dear editors,
I watched the following video on money.cnn.com:
http://money.cnn.com/video/ft/#/video/fortune/2008/01/31/streetlife.candidates.fortune
I was frankly disgusted that Andy could do such a shoddy job of
reporting on the Presidential election. The whole time he begs for
a candidate with a sound and specific economic plan; but fails to even
bring up Ron Paul but has already released just such a plan
which Andy claimed doesn't exist:
http://www.ronpaul2008.com/prosperity
Was Andy being lazy and just not doing his research? Did he purposely
leave out Dr. Paul so he could make sweeping generalizations
about the rest of the field (on whom he was correct, by the way)?
Either way, I think Andy should extend his invitation for debate to
Ron
Paul so he could actually get some real answers on the economy, rather
than the mimic rhetoric (which he claims to hate) from the other
candidates.
Please note that I am not just making a point, I am actually looking
for answers to these questions. If you do not know Andy's motivation,
please forward
this email to him so he can answer in his own words as I was unable to
locate contact information for him him directly (he /is/ the editor, I
hope he reads these...)
Thank You
Jason