Honestly I don't see any harm in Ron Paul running as a 3rd party. We have nothing to lose.
No thanks, not interested in funding a Rand run.People who are clamoring for a 3rd party run aren't seeing the big picture. Our numbers growing - more and more are coming over to the side of liberty. Even if Paul doesn't win, he is laying the groundwork for future Liberty candidates to run in his stead (think Rand in 2016).
People who are clamoring for a 3rd party run aren't seeing the big picture. Our numbers growing - more and more are coming over to the side of liberty. Even if Paul doesn't win, he is laying the groundwork for future Liberty candidates to run in his stead (think Rand in 2016). Think of the fact that Ron wins young voters decisively. We are the future of the GOP and its just a matter of time before we take over. By running 3rd party, we won't achieve anything expect generate animosity towards us from the rank and file GOP voters. Whether justified or not, they will blame us if they lose to Obama in November...
Giving Obama the election is not an FU to the party. Because as you've stated, its the same Party. Obama goes in, win for the establishment. Romney or Grinch goes in, win for the establishment.
Giving the GOP and FU does NOTHING! It only makes your ego feel better because you are personally invested in Ron Paul. You've poured your heart and soul and money and time into Ron Paul, and the party and the media treats him like shit. Yes, it would feel great to say FU to the GOP. But if the powers that be are still in control, and the people are still in the dark... it does NOTHING.
Two things that actually do something is infiltrating the party, and changing people's minds. Both of these are much better acheived in the GOP as of now.
Not everyone who isn't on-board with Paul is a neocon. Very few are, in fact.
Taft may not matter to conservatives, because they don't really know what he stood for. Goldwater is a different story. Reagan, even more so. I think a very large number of conservatives want someone with the principles that Reagan espoused. They were the same as Goldwater's. Problem is, they aren't *hearing* those things from Dr. Paul, so they don't recognize that what they want so badly, is right in front of them.
People who are clamoring for a 3rd party run aren't seeing the big picture. Our numbers growing - more and more are coming over to the side of liberty. Even if Paul doesn't win, he is laying the groundwork for future Liberty candidates to run in his stead (think Rand in 2016). Think of the fact that Ron wins young voters decisively. We are the future of the GOP and its just a matter of time before we take over. By running 3rd party, we won't achieve anything expect generate animosity towards us from the rank and file GOP voters. Whether justified or not, they will blame us if they lose to Obama in November...
The idea that Ron Paul's would give the election to Obama was spun up by the media. We need to reject it. He just as well could steal the election from Obama and give it to Romney.
People who are clamoring for a 3rd party run aren't seeing the big picture. Our numbers growing - more and more are coming over to the side of liberty. Even if Paul doesn't win, he is laying the groundwork for future Liberty candidates to run in his stead (think Rand in 2016). Think of the fact that Ron wins young voters decisively. We are the future of the GOP and its just a matter of time before we take over. By running 3rd party, we won't achieve anything expect generate animosity towards us from the rank and file GOP voters. Whether justified or not, they will blame us if they lose to Obama in November...
No thanks, not interested in funding a Rand run.
He agrees with Ron on almost everything (and is his son to boot). I am interested in knowing why you are completely rejecting him...
Yes, but Democrats and Independents aren't paying as much attention yet, and we haven't started crafting a message to them. What happens when we start hammering Obama on extrajudicial assassination, habeas corpus, bank bailouts, etc.Multiple polls show that Paul draws more votes from Romney than from Obama.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation...es_presidential_election,_2012#Three-way_race
He agrees with Ron on almost everything (and is his son to boot). I am interested in knowing why you are completely rejecting him...
I've seen Rand suck up to TPTB. He doesn't have ron's courage.
Yeah, but not enough. Obama's gonna spend a billion dollars.
Would the media ignore Paul, or give him lots of attention so that Obama would win?
Agree! we will need the rank and file voters once we take over the party
Last I heard it was close to or at 40 percent. I know that it's a higher percentage than Dems and Repubicans. The percentage breakdown goes something like 40 indy, 30 dems and 30 republicans.
Multiple polls show that Paul draws more votes from Romney than from Obama.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nation...es_presidential_election,_2012#Three-way_race
Pretty much scared of the TSA as well.