Neocons Point Housebroken Trump at Iran

[William Tell]

I will eat my MAGA hat when Trump sends 150,000 troops to Syria to overthrow Assad which is what the neocons want. Until then, you have zero credibility.

So if Trump sends 140,000 troops in you will still be in denial.

 

[Origanalist]

So if Trump sends 140,000 troops in you will still be in denial.

Or 155,000. It has to be 150,000 or I have no credibility.

 

[William Tell]

Or 155,000. It has to be 150,000 or I have no credibility.

I think 155,000 is close enough. 160,000 wouldn't count though.

 

[openfire]

Grow up. I used the figure of 150,000, because that's the number of troops that analysts believe would be required to invade Syria and overthrow Assad. Regardless of the actual number, my point is that if Trump were to go this route, I would admit that I was wrong all along. But I don't think that's going to happen...

Consider:

• The missile strikes against the Syrian airbase were completely ineffective - Syrian planes were flying the next day.
• Russia was given advanced warning
• The operation was done while Trump was having dinner with Xi Jinping
• Assad clearly didn't use chemical weapons - Trump knows this

The end result of this missile attack, combined with dropping a MOAB on ISIS in Afghanistan:

• The deep state has lost its "Trump is in collusion with Russia" narrative
• Neocon shills like McCain et al have been neutered
• China has abandoned NK

^ All this, and Assad is still in power, Trump's approval rating has gone up, his bargaining position has been greatly enhanced, and best of all - the deep state narrative has been destroyed.

4d chess. No flip flops, despite what you have been led to believe by the likes of the shills here and elsewhere. Art of the deal.

 

[TheCount]

 

[CPUd]

I think 155,000 is close enough. 160,000 wouldn't count though.

What about "military advisors", do they count as BOTG?

 

[openfire]

What about "military advisors", do they count as BOTG?

How can you even ask that question with a straight face after voting for McCain?

And Hillary Clinton?



Scumbags of your ilk would be terminated with extreme prejudice if I were the owner of this forum.

 

[CPUd]

So if Trump sends 140,000 troops in you will still be in denial.

It depends on whether the troops are in Iran or "in" Iran. Apparently that is a big difference.

 

[openfire]

It depends on whether the troops are in Iran or "in" Iran. Apparently that is a big difference.

Still won't answer the question, huh?

 

[CPUd]

Trump's been after Iran his whole campaign; this is the area that let me know he was definitely a neocon.

Getting rid of Flynn slowed it down a bit, but there are several Bush people on the NSC and the de-facto State Dept (AKA Nikki Haley) who would jump on that bandwagon.

 

[jmdrake]

Did you or did you not vote for McCain?

Using the Trump supporter logic I keep seeing around here, everybody should have voted for McCain. I keep hearing "Trump isn't Hillary" and "Well at least Hillary lost." Well, for what it's worth, McCain isn't Obama.

 

[openfire]

Using the Trump supporter logic I keep seeing around here, everybody should have voted for McCain. I keep hearing "Trump isn't Hillary" and "Well at least Hillary lost." Well, for what it's worth, McCain isn't Obama.

Wrong. McCain = Obama = Hillary

 

[CPUd]

Using the Trump supporter logic I keep seeing around here, everybody should have voted for McCain. I keep hearing "Trump isn't Hillary" and "Well at least Hillary lost." Well, for what it's worth, McCain isn't Obama.

He thinks there is some significance that I posted once that I would have supported McCain over GWB and Al Gore in 2000 and Clinton over Obama in 2008, even though the "scumbag" in the Oval Office today has donated thousands and/or campaigned for pretty much all of them. This is all because he had a tantrum a while back, called these forums a "fucking joke" and said he was out.

 

[openfire]

He thinks there is some significance that I posted once that I would have supported McCain over GWB and Al Gore in 2000 and Clinton over Obama in 2008, even though the "scumbag" in the Oval Office today has donated thousands and/or campaigned for pretty much all of them. This is all because he had a tantrum a while back, called these forums a "$#@!ing joke" and said he was out.

Nice try. While we were fighting for Ron Paul in 2008, you were for Hillary. And McCain before that. You are a neoliberal and a liar.

 

[jmdrake]

Wrong. McCain = Obama = Hillary

.....=Trump on healthcare, regime change in Iraq, regime change in Libya, regime change in Syria. McCain = Trump on Iran nuke deal and Cuba.

 

[openfire]

.....=Trump on healthcare, regime change in Iraq, regime change in Libya, regime change in Syria. McCain = Trump on Iran nuke deal and Cuba.

The controlled puppets (Obama, Hillary, McCain, et al) are all globalists because their puppet masters aren't American, have no allegiance to any country and want to destroy national sovereignty. Trump is a nationalist. I'm an anti globalist.

 

[CPUd]

Nice try. While we were fighting for Ron Paul in 2008, you were for Hillary. And McCain before that. You are a neoliberal and a liar.

I didn't donate thousands of dollars or stump for them like the man you are currently fighting for did. I liked McCain because he had a cool bus, and I went to a Clinton meetup because there was a hot girl invited me and I wanted to take her to dinner.

 

[openfire]

All western governments have been captured by the same entity. The parasite must be purged before we can debate the minutiae of policy details in any meaningful way.

 

[openfire]

I didn't donate thousands of dollars or stump for them like the man you are currently fighting for did. I liked McCain because he had a cool bus, and I went to a Clinton meetup because there was a hot girl invited me and I wanted to take her to dinner.

Cuz "principles". I see.

 

[CPUd]

The controlled puppets (Obama, Hillary, McCain, et al) are all globalists because their puppet masters aren't American, have no allegiance to any country and want to destroy national sovereignty. Trump is a nationalist. I'm an anti globalist.

How does that work, calling yourself a nationalist while shilling for President Goldman?