Neil Young, Willie Nelson, Dave Matthews, John Mellencamp: Help Us Stop the DARK Act

donnay

Member
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
42,534
Neil Young, Willie Nelson, Dave Matthews, John Mellencamp: Help Us Stop the DARK Act


Dave Matthews, Willie Nelson, John Mellencamp and Neil Young are speaking out against the controversial Safe and Accurate Food Labeling Act (H.R. 1599), also known as the Deny Americans the Right to Know, or DARK Act.

The legislation would require the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to regulate the distribution and labeling of genetically modified foods (GMOs), thus preempting states’ rights to label GMOs themselves.

farmaid.jpg

Dave Matthews, Willie Nelson, John Mellencamp and Neil Young join the overwhelming margin of American voters who say consumers should have the right to know if their food is genetically modified. Photo credit: Farm Aid

The famous musicians, who serve as board members of Farm Aid, signed a joint letter calling on President Obama to stop the DARK Act rider, which some lawmakers in Congress are trying to sneak onto to the year-end omnibus spending bill.

“Giant food, chemical and biotech corporations have spent millions of dollars to block our right to know what’s in our food. Their latest effort is to pass what’s been called the DARK (Deny Americans the Right to Know) Act,” Farm Aid wrote on a Facebook post last Friday. “It would preempt GMO labeling laws already passed in Connecticut, Maine and Vermont and obstruct mandatory federal labeling of GMOs.”

In their joint letter, Matthews, Nelson, Mellencamp and Young bring up the “clear public support for labeling and transparency in the food system.” According to Just Label It, 89 percent of American voters are in support of mandatory GMO labeling.

Additionally, the letter states, “That same right is already held by citizens in 64 countries and it is a right that we, as board members of Farm Aid, have fought to attain for some time.”

Farm Aid is a nonprofit organization that organizes its famous annual benefit concert to raise money for family farmers in the U.S. Nelson, Young and Mellencamp organized the first Farm Aid concert on Sept. 22, 1985, in Champaign, Illinois. Matthews joined the Farm Aid board of directors in 2001. The 30th anniversary of Farm Aid was held on Sept. 19, 2015 in Chicago, Illinois. To date, Farm Aid has raised $48 million for the country’s family farmers.

Read more: http://ecowatch.com/2015/12/14/stop-dark-act/
 
The agricultural industrial complex claims that labeling GMOs will hurt small farmers the most and could put many out of business.

It's so nice to see Monsanto and all the giant agricultural companies looking out for the small guy for a change.
 
The agricultural industrial complex claims that labeling GMOs will hurt small farmers the most and could put many out of business.

It's so nice to see Monsanto and all the giant agricultural companies looking out for the small guy for a change.

Right. Because small business never benefits from lower production costs. And it isn't a complex - it's the small farmers saying that. But of course, big government loving liberals never let facts get in the way of their "Let's mandate it!" arguments.

Everything the anti-GMO crowd says is a lie. The end.
 
Right. Because small business never benefits from lower production costs. And it isn't a complex - it's the small farmers saying that. But of course, big government loving liberals never let facts get in the way of their "Let's mandate it!" arguments.

Everything the anti-GMO crowd says is a lie. The end.

Who's the liar? Looking in the mirror?

Individuals should have the right to know what is in their food. Why would a liberty-advocate deny this?
 
Who's the liar? Looking in the mirror?

Individuals should have the right to know what is in their food. Why would a liberty-advocate deny this?

You have the right to eat with a blindfold on and to not have the ending of a movie spoiled.

If it's war between Mandating X and Mandating Not-X, then I'm happy to be on the side of no mandates. Screw the 89%:

... 89 percent of American voters are in support of mandatory GMO labeling

I'll defend my right to buy and consume mystery food as well as the producer's right to label as they see fit. It doesn't excuse them from normal contractual obligations which both buyer and seller ought to be a party to without meddlesome cuntry music interlopers.
 
Who's the liar? Looking in the mirror?

Individuals should have the right to know what is in their food. Why would a liberty-advocate deny this?
Because it would grant government the authority to rob the public in order to establish the related regulations necessary to enforce the proposal?
 
Right. Because small business never benefits from lower production costs. And it isn't a complex - it's the small farmers saying that. But of course, big government loving liberals never let facts get in the way of their "Let's mandate it!" arguments.

Everything the anti-GMO crowd says is a lie. The end.


So then I presume you believe that the agricultural industrial complex, Monsanto et al., is actually looking out for the little guy here?
 
You have the right to eat with a blindfold on and to not have the ending of a movie spoiled.

If it's war between Mandating X and Mandating Not-X, then I'm happy to be on the side of no mandates. Screw the 89%:



I'll defend my right to buy and consume mystery food as well as the producer's right to label as they see fit. It doesn't excuse them from normal contractual obligations which both buyer and seller ought to be a party to without meddlesome cuntry music interlopers.

I would like to see all government mandated labels on food abolished so that the free market can come up with better solutions - BUT - since the government mandates labels on food, and additionally mandates that they are done a specific way, they should be done accurately. If it is corn syrup in the ingredients, then it isn't just "corn". Imagine if the government forced companies to just say "corn" on the label instead of "corn syrup", and if they put "corn syrup" they would be fined and forced to replace "corn syrup" simply with "corn" on their label. Consumers wouldn't know precisely what is in their food.

Again, while I'd like to see the labels abolished, if they exist they should be accurate and I would like them to write "corn syrup" on the label. Additionally, if it isn't corn in the ingredients, but some GMO corn, that should be listed as well.

The fact is these companies are very restricted regarding what they can write on their food products, so as a food/liberty proponent we can try to increase the accuracy of food labeling within the government mandate paradigm while also opposing government mandated labels on food.
 
I would like to see all government mandated labels on food abolished so that the free market can come up with better solutions - BUT - since the government mandates labels on food, and additionally mandates that they are done a specific way, they should be done accurately. If it is corn syrup in the ingredients, then it isn't just "corn". Imagine if the government forced companies to just say "corn" on the label instead of "corn syrup", and if they put "corn syrup" they would be fined and forced to replace "corn syrup" simply with "corn" on their label. Consumers wouldn't know precisely what is in their food.

Again, while I'd like to see the labels abolished, if they exist they should be accurate and I would like them to write "corn syrup" on the label. Additionally, if it isn't corn in the ingredients, but some GMO corn, that should be listed as well.

The fact is these companies are very restricted regarding what they can write on their food products, so as a food/liberty proponent we can try to increase the accuracy of food labeling within the government mandate paradigm while also opposing government mandated labels on food.

Exactly.

The independent nonprofit "Project Verify" is doing just this...however the Dark Act would prohibit it from informing the customers to their rigorous standards like they do.

The bill would give jurisdiction over non-GMO certification to the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA), which doesn’t have the same rigor as independent certification programs.

Because of public perception around GMOs, companies are much more likely to advertise the absence of genetically modified ingredients in their products–whether they’re big corporations like Chipotle and General Mills, or small food companies using labels like the butterfly and checkmark logo of the Non-GMO Project, an independent nonprofit.

H.R. 1599 would put the system of voluntary non-GMO certification under the jurisdiction of the USDA. The USDA already has its own (new) certification program, which is much less rigorous than the Non-GMO Projects and doesn’t require testing or segregation. If the bill passes, however, independent verifiers would essentially use the USDA’s standards and process (much like with the federal organic standards). No one knows whether the new USDA verification process will take longer, cost more, or be more onerous than independent verifications. (A previous version of the bill had language that would block private GMO-free labels, but that has been taken out of the current draft.)
http://www.globalresearch.ca/gmo-la...-act-deny-americans-the-right-to-know/5463926
 
Is it just me or does John Mellanchamp look like he's got something odd going on in the top half of his head?

No it isn't just you--he kind of has that Frankenstein look going. Not one of his better hair days, I suppose.
 
Back
Top