NEEDED FOR RON 2B NOMINATED ON FLOOR-SPREAD TRUTH RE: LA & OK BEFORE TAMPA spread VIDEO

I can cut from multiple videos if someone(s) can write what to put in the captions. Something of the form:

which video, timestamp, text to appear, video paused during text or not
 
CPUd said:
I can cut from multiple videos if someone(s) can write what to put in the captions. Something of the form:

which video, timestamp, text to appear, video paused during text or not
Click to expand...

thank you! I have to run out but I will rough something up tomorrow and pm it to you if no one else does. I'd like a parliamentarian to look it over before it is finalized though. I think I know a couple by user name but maybe we could hire the parliamentarian hired in Louisiana to go over the copy if torchbearer knows the identity of that person.
 
today I will watch the video and take a stab at language to be added but if we have a parliamentarian who can review it that would be great. I also want to send it by torchbearer before it goes in the video to make sure I am accurately describing events.
 
ClydeCoulter said:
huh? I don't see it at the link.
Click to expand...

oh, dang. I can see it but it says 'your comment is awaiting moderation'. Here is my comment:

By the way, the only way Ron Paul would NOT have a MAJORITY of delegates in at least five states is if the credentials committee cheats and doesn’t seat his delegates. For example, the Paul delegates in Louisiana are being challenged even though he had a supermajority of delegates to state convention where they were chosen, and won the Louisiana caucuses in a landslide. The party types tried to pretend they had changed the rules so no chair could be removed and it only took a third of the vote to pass, etc, but those rules ‘created’ by ignoring the majority vote at the rules committee which voted in a different chair, were never ratified because the self declared chair at the state convention was removed and replaced before that could happen.

Removal of the state chair required he ignore at least 3 motions or properly brought points of order, which was easy, since they were trying to break the rules and didn’t dare recognize activity from the floor where Paul delegates would carry the vote. The first 2:15 of this video shows those motions being made and is boring, but after that it is removal of the chair and a synopsis of why it would take a cheating credentials committee to refuse to seat the Paul delegation at Tampa. With LA, even ignoring OK where Paul delegates also should be seated, Paul has a MAJORITY of 5 states: NV, IA, ME, MN and Louisiana. Synopsis video of the LA State GOP convention here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k884ZKUNwbo&feature=player_embedded#t=0s
Click to expand...
 
Last edited:
sailingaway said:
oh, dang. I can see it but it says 'your comment is awaiting moderation'. Here is my comment:
Click to expand...

Does anyone here know shawnmwilson (the youtube channel)? In order for all of the links to remain valid that have been passed around, HE needs to add the text using youtube tools. HELP?
 
I need a parliamentarian to look at my comment above and make sure it is accurate because that is essentially what I would put into captions.

and yeah, it is still under moderation. Maybe the youtube link flagged it or something.
 
More than just circulation of the videos needs to take place. If we are being asked to visit forums and explain what went on we need a time line for each video pointing out what rules were violated and what SHOULD have taken place. Please provide THAT detailed info so those of us who can do so have all the ammo we need to prove wrong doing took place.

Ideally, you'll provide a timeline pointing how where Robert's Rules were violated that we can cut and paste and send along with the video link. Thanks.
 
Yeah, but for that we need a parliamentarian.

I can say generally essentially what I said in my 'comment' above, but not give citation etc.

the removal of chair after three proper motions or points of order is generally allowed in Roberts rules, though so the different variations of the rules shouldn't matter. It might make sense to just use this generally now, and as we get more refined tools, use those. We are just trying to persuade the general masses at this moment, obviously, we need the details for the actual challenge.

but if you read the comment I posted then watch the video, I think it is just generally persuasive. Did you watch it?
 
Last edited:
Hmm....

I've been spreading this in comments and tweeted it, is anyone else doing that? I know ClydeCoulter did. It isn't likely to do as much good if a bunch of us don't do this, but it should only take a lot of us doing a little. Your time and your choice, but I really see this as an opportunity.
 
sailingaway said:
Hmm....

I've been spreading this in comments and tweeted it, is anyone else doing that? I know ClydeCoulter did. It isn't likely to do as much good if a bunch of us don't do this, but it should only take a lot of us doing a little. Your time and your choice, but I really see this as an opportunity.
Click to expand...

^^^ THIS, I see this as pretty important ^^^

Do We Have Any Parliamentarians In The House to Help Out?
 
sailingaway said:
Hmm....

I've been spreading this in comments and tweeted it, is anyone else doing that? I know ClydeCoulter did. It isn't likely to do as much good if a bunch of us don't do this, but it should only take a lot of us doing a little. Your time and your choice, but I really see this as an opportunity.
Click to expand...

Agreed. I think it would help if the video had the captioning you guys were talking about.

It would really, really be great if we could more MSM, Ben Swann type coverage of it.


Romney knows he's already on shaky ground with a lot of the GOP base. His credentials committee needs to know theyd be stirring up trouble with a large voting bloc by condoning the LA GOPs bully tactics.
 
IDefendThePlatform said:
Agreed. I think it would help if the video had the captioning you guys were talking about.

It would really, really be great if we could more MSM, Ben Swann type coverage of it.


Romney knows he's already on shaky ground with a lot of the GOP base. His credentials committee needs to know theyd be stirring up trouble with a large voting bloc by condoning the LA GOPs bully tactics.
Click to expand...

Swann did at least do something on it but that was before Romney's campaign said they had never said they would back our delegates.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

ronpaulhawaii
Ron Paul BBQ team looking to expand event size
Replies
6
Views
211
ronpaulhawaii
ronpaulhawaii
Occam's Banana
The lessons of Ron Paul
Replies
12
Views
549
acptulsa
acptulsa
Brian4Liberty
  • Featured
Preparing the Famous "What If" Speech
Replies
7
Views
303
Anti Globalist
Anti Globalist
PAF
Who Killed Charlie Kirk?
Replies
2
Views
545
James_Madison_Lives
J
Brian4Liberty
  • Featured
Take the Deal, President Trump
Replies
0
Views
101
Brian4Liberty
Brian4Liberty
Back
Top