Navy official: 9/11 Flight 93 was shot down

FrankRep

Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2007
Messages
28,885
Gitmo prosecutor repeats al Qaeda deputy's claim: Flight 93 was shot down on 9/11


Reuters/Raw Story
July 23, 2008
...


"If they hadn't shot down the fourth plane it would've hit the dome," Stone, a Navy officer, said in his opening remarks, repeating Bin Laden's deputy's claim.

The tribunal's chief prosecutor, Col. Lawrence Morris, later explained that Stone was quoting Hamdan in evidence that will be presented at trial. Morris declined to say if the "dome" was a reference to the U.S. Capitol.

"Virtually no one knew the intended target, but the accused knew," Stone said.

United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania. U.S. officials have never stated it was shot down although rumors saying that abound to this day.
...


Full Story:
http://rawstory.com//news/2008/Was_Flight_93_shot_down_on_0723.html



I think it's time to lay off the 9/11 truthers. They were right.
 
Gitmo prosecutor repeats al Qaeda deputy's claim: Flight 93 was shot down on 9/11


Reuters/Raw Story
July 23, 2008
...


"If they hadn't shot down the fourth plane it would've hit the dome," Stone, a Navy officer, said in his opening remarks, repeating Bin Laden's deputy's claim.

The tribunal's chief prosecutor, Col. Lawrence Morris, later explained that Stone was quoting Hamdan in evidence that will be presented at trial. Morris declined to say if the "dome" was a reference to the U.S. Capitol.

"Virtually no one knew the intended target, but the accused knew," Stone said.

United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania. U.S. officials have never stated it was shot down although rumors saying that abound to this day.
...


Full Story:
http://rawstory.com//news/2008/Was_Flight_93_shot_down_on_0723.html



I think it's time to lay off the 9/11 truthers. They were right.

Misleading thread title. He is merely quoting the driver. How would al Qaeda know what happened over Pennsylvania?
 
Gitmo prosecutor repeats al Qaeda deputy's claim: Flight 93 was shot down on 9/11


Reuters/Raw Story
July 23, 2008
...


"If they hadn't shot down the fourth plane it would've hit the dome," Stone, a Navy officer, said in his opening remarks, repeating Bin Laden's deputy's claim.

The tribunal's chief prosecutor, Col. Lawrence Morris, later explained that Stone was quoting Hamdan in evidence that will be presented at trial. Morris declined to say if the "dome" was a reference to the U.S. Capitol.

"Virtually no one knew the intended target, but the accused knew," Stone said.

United Airlines Flight 93 crashed in a field in rural Pennsylvania. U.S. officials have never stated it was shot down although rumors saying that abound to this day.
...


Full Story:
http://rawstory.com//news/2008/Was_Flight_93_shot_down_on_0723.html



I think it's time to lay off the 9/11 truthers. They were right.

Great. So the terrorists aren't liars and the passengers on the plane aren't heroes. It also implies that my government can shoot down a plane while it can't keep 45 million Mexicans from invading across our borders. This is nothing like what I want to hear.
 
My question...how could the government manage to track down a rogue flight like Flight 93 yet be unable to defend the Pentagon and the skies of Washington DC?
 
I have no doubt that it was shot down.

But the other claims of the "truthers", like that the twin towers were demolished by explosives from within.. well that's just ridiculous.

But hey, even a stopped clock is right twice a day.
 
I have no doubt that it was shot down.

But the other claims of the "truthers", like that the twin towers were demolished by explosives from within.. well that's just ridiculous.

But hey, even a stopped clock is right twice a day.

It wouldn't necessarily be bombs...just a few well placed containers of thermate that would cut through the steel like a hot knife through butter. Besides, have you seen the collapse of WTC7? How could anyone believe that was caused by fire?
 
It wouldn't necessarily be bombs...just a few well placed containers of thermate that would cut through the steel like a hot knife through butter. Besides, have you seen the collapse of WTC7? How could anyone believe that was caused by fire?

People, like Feenix566, that believe in the tooth fairy find it believable.
 
when i was watching this whole thing unfold on the major networks that day, nbc cbs and abd all said that the plane had been shot down. the next day and there after the story was not talked about for about 3 days. then the whole crash story was played up.
 
Ah. The official story of flight 93 is one that I have to believe.

"Americans fighting back to take control of the cockpit."

Sorry, whether it was true or not, I'd prefer to believe that heroic story over some government hoax blather any day.

I'm *usually* very tolerant of truthers here, but come on.
 
My question...how could the government manage to track down a rogue flight like Flight 93 yet be unable to defend the Pentagon and the skies of Washington DC?

There was something like a 40 minute (I dont remember the timeline exactly) gap between the Pentagon crash and the PA crash. Those jets can fly pretty damn far in 40 minutes. Flight 93 was always on the radar eventhough its transponder was turned off.
 
Unmanned armed Predator type ( Global Hawk ? ) drone is one common "shoot down" theory scenario. ;)
 
Last edited:
There was something like a 40 minute (I dont remember the timeline exactly) gap between the Pentagon crash and the PA crash. Those jets can fly pretty damn far in 40 minutes. Flight 93 was always on the radar eventhough its transponder was turned off.

Oh no doubt...I just find it odd that a plane can fly through the nation's capital and somehow manage to dodge the AA at both the White House and the Pentagon.
 
"AA" do you mean AAA?

No. AA as in anti-aircraft/anti-missile batteries. The White House and Pentagon are home to many. The question is why didn't the people at the controls do their job and shoot the plane down?
 
Back
Top