Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection?

Brian4Liberty

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jul 13, 2007
Messages
63,493
Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection?

Nearly 40% of new COVID patients were vaccinated - compared to just 1% who had been infected previously.

Coronavirus patients who recovered from the virus were far less likely to become infected during the latest wave of the pandemic than people who were vaccinated against COVID, according to numbers presented to the Israeli Health Ministry.

Health Ministry data on the wave of COVID outbreaks which began this May show that Israelis with immunity from natural infection were far less likely to become infected again in comparison to Israelis who only had immunity via vaccination.

More than 7,700 new cases of the virus have been detected during the most recent wave starting in May, but just 72 of the confirmed cases were reported in people who were known to have been infected previously – that is, less than 1% of the new cases.
...
https://www.israelnationalnews.com/News/News.aspx/309762
 

Your immune system will be as strong as the opponents it fights...

bitmap.png
 
Last edited:

Turning off the news gave me the most protection.

In Amerika they claim the unvaccinated are getting sick. In Israel, that doesn't seem to be the case.

The PCR tests positive in healthy people. It tests positive in sick people. It tests positive on tigers and pineapples.


We were told constantly in med school that the people who got measles naturallywere immune for life. When the vaccine came out in 1963 "they" said it would be for life...............except they lied.

They are lying now too. None of the stats you see are real. The CDC should be abolished. It serves no purpose. Politicians couldn't stop an actual deadly virus if it did show up.
 
Too late, I already have a corner on that market.

d00d, we been need'n to par-tay for years!

i hate opening those packs, i have no fingernails so...it sucks gettin em out


see u in the camps or victory lane!
 
 
Natural immunity is always the best, so long as your immune system is not completely compromised.
 
Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection?


"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger"

H/T Genghis Khan :)

But this question if properly worded starts to make less sense.

Reworded Q: Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection against infections?


I think a better version of question would be:

"Natural infection" vs "vaccination":

1) which is more likely to cause severe/long term damage to body organs like lungs, brain tissue etc?

2) which offers stronger "gene therapy" characteristics?

3) which is more likely to harm people with compromised immune systems, cause ICU stay and worst case outcome (moving on)?

4) Lastly, if both are products of labs, which is more "natural"?


Leaving these out here for people with knowledge in this field.
 
"What doesn't kill you makes you stronger"

H/T Genghis Khan :)

But this question if properly worded starts to make less sense.

Reworded Q: Natural infection vs vaccination: Which gives more protection against infections?


I think a better version of question would be:

"Natural infection" vs "vaccination":

1) which is more likely to cause severe/long term damage to body organs like lungs, brain tissue etc?

2) which offers stronger "gene therapy" characteristics?

3) which is more likely to harm people with compromised immune systems, cause ICU stay and worst case outcome (moving on)?

4) Lastly, if both are products of labs, which is more "natural"?


Leaving these out here for people with knowledge in this field.

The long term brain damage is going to be difficult to tell as many test subjects ( vaccinated ) were already bitten by that bug.
 
From another thread:

Just found out that yet another person that I am acquainted with (have actually met in real life) is hospitalized with COVID. She was vaccinated. Still don't know of any unvaccinated people (who probably had COVID early on) who have tested positive or gotten sick.
 

I was cringing before it started (these "speaking truth to impotent local 'authorities'"-lectures are usually a cringe-fest).... but this was 10/10 and I highly recommend. The "double mask", for example, was an obvious example where Fauci, and others who were briefly pumping that narrative, nakedly exposed that they themselves understand absolutely nothing about infectious disease. The idea of masks was supposed to be that "it slows the spread". While this is true enough, it remains a fact that masks merely slow the spread, and doubling/tripling/zintillion-tupling masks that cannot filter particles anywhere near as small as airborne viruses is an act of lunacy. More important than this specific factoid is how it demonstrates the true mental acumen of people who are being held up as "leading global expert on pandemics" -- as if anyone can be an "expert" (have experience) in pandemics affecting an unprecedented global population. If a real 12 Monkeys or 28 Days Later scenario occurs, these "experts" will be as useless as Biden's mouth.

image.png
 
Back
Top