National Poll: Clinton, Sanders both top Trump

[invisible]

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/01/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-poll/index.html

Both of the remaining Democratic candidates for president easily top Republican front-runner Donald Trump in hypothetical general election match-ups, according to a new CNN/ORC Poll.

In the scenario that appears most likely to emerge from the primary contests, Clinton tops Trump 52% to 44% among registered voters. That result has tilted in Clinton's favor since the last CNN/ORC Poll on the match-up in January.

Sanders -- who enjoys the most positive favorable rating of any presidential candidate in the field, according to the poll -- tops all three Republicans by wide margins: 57% to 40% against Cruz, 55% to 43% against Trump, and 53% to 45% against Rubio.

So the polls are always right, but this time they're wrong, right?
There's some sort of strategic value to voting for trump, right?
Voting for someone who won't win an election is a horrible thing to do, right?

Again, could someone please explain what I'm supposedly not understanding here?

 

[Dianne]

Let's bring back Mitt Romney or John McCain, I'm sure they will do better lmao.

 

[misterx]

Actually, general election polls during the primaries are always wrong. I remember when all the polls said that every Dem would beat Bush by a long shot in '04. That didn't happen, did it? After the nominating process is over and the nominees start lobbing attacks at each other everything changes.

 

[invisible]

Actually, general election polls during the primaries are always wrong. I remember when all the polls said that every Dem would beat Bush by a long shot in '04. That didn't happen, did it? After the nominating process is over and the nominees start lobbing attacks at each other everything changes.

LMAO! Right on cue! Next!

 

[TheTexan]

I'm not worried about it. Trump has plenty of time to make his polls great again.

 

[thoughtomator]

http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/01/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-poll/index.html





So the polls are always right, but this time they're wrong, right?
There's some sort of strategic value to voting for trump, right?
Voting for someone who won't win an election is a horrible thing to do, right?

Again, could someone please explain what I'm supposedly not understanding here?

You don't think Trump is going to take Hillary to the woodshed once it's a one on one?

 

[invisible]

You don't think Trump is going to take Hillary to the woodshed once it's a one on one?

So the polls are always right, but this time they must obviously be wrong.
And remember, there's some sort of strategic value to voting for trump.
Liberty is best served by voting for "the winner".

Next!

 

[misterx]

So the polls are always right, but this time they must obviously be wrong.
And remember, there's some sort of strategic value to voting for trump.
Liberty is best served by voting for "the winner".

Next!

You're repeating your same argument that has already been refuted. It's no more right now than it was the first time you said it.

 

[wmmonk]

Another SHAM poll. No mention of Vermin Supreme.
This entire process is rigged against the one guy with great plans.

 

[invisible]

You're repeating your same argument that has already been refuted. It's no more right now than it was the first time you said it.

No, he had repeated the same argument that you made, which I had already refuted. It's no more correct now, than it was when you said it.

But technically, part of his argument was the fact that polls get more and more accurate, the closer they are taken to the election.
So, from the article:
http://www.cnn.com/2016/03/01/politics/donald-trump-hillary-clinton-bernie-sanders-poll/index.html

In the scenario that appears most likely to emerge from the primary contests, Clinton tops Trump 52% to 44% among registered voters. That result has tilted in Clinton's favor since the last CNN/ORC Poll on the match-up in January.

But like The Texan says, candidate trump has plenty of time to make his polls great again! After all, that's exactly what will happen, right? You guys just couldn't possibly ever be wrong!

 

[r3volution 3.0]

You don't think Trump is going to take Hillary to the woodshed once it's a one on one?

Trump works for Bill Clinton.

He is an employee.

 

[misterx]

No, he had repeated the same argument that you made, which I had already refuted. It's no more correct now, than it was when you said it.

Funny, I didn't know that "LMAO! Right on cue! Next!", counted as a refutation.

You guys have been wrong all along, starting when you said Trump would never get out of the teens in the polls and that he wouldn't win a single state. Your credibility as a prognosticator is already shot.

 

[AuH20]

Trump brings new voters that would never consider voting, never mind choosing the Republican party. His entire campaign represents a new paradigm. Throw out the old rules.

 

[r3volution 3.0]

Trump brings new voters that would never consider voting, never mind choosing the Republican party. His entire campaign represents a new paradigm. Throw out the old rules.

A whole paradigm huh?

....

 

[invisible]

Funny, I didn't know that "LMAO! Right on cue! Next!", counted as a refutation.

You guys have been wrong all along, starting when you said Trump would never get out of the teens in the polls and that he wouldn't win a single state. Your credibility as a prognosticator is already shot.

That wasn't part of the refutation. I'm surprised that such an incredibly intelligent guy like yourself wasn't able to tell! I never made any of the claims that you're claiming I did, you must have me confused with someone else.
Yes, yes, I'm wrong. Of course I am. After all, you're a trump supporter!

 

[FindLiberty]

...think Trump is going to take Hillary to the woodshed once it's a one on one?

I hope so...

 

[invisible]

Trump brings new voters that would never consider voting, never mind choosing the Republican party. His entire campaign represents a new paradigm. Throw out the old rules.

Which rules are you talking about, exactly? The Constitution? Or are you claiming that this poll must be inaccurate?

Oh, I remember your claim now! trump is going to defeat the establishment! That's right! We need to elect trump in the primary, that'll help us defeat the establishment in the general election. Of course! How could I possibly have been so silly to think otherwise?

 

[GunnyFreedom]

You're repeating your same argument that has already been refuted. It's no more right now than it was the first time you said it.

Your fevered imagination doesn't count as 'refutation.'

 

[misterx]

That wasn't part of the refutation. I'm surprised that such an incredibly intelligent guy like yourself wasn't able to tell! I never made any of the claims that you're claiming I did, you must have me confused with someone else.
Yes, yes, I'm wrong. Of course I am. After all, you're a trump supporter!

My God! It's like talking to a child. Isn't it past your bedtime?

 

[Brian4Liberty]

Hail Hitlary Caesar! I don't know about all of you subversives, but I've always loved Big Sister. I'm hoping for a raise and a cubicle next to Zippy. So long boys. See you in the funny papers.





/s