[National Guard Deployed] L.A. Protesters Clash With Immigration Agents Again

The governor doesn't have to say that there is a state of war for there to be one.

The president shall act preemptively if there is a threat of war.

The people gas lighting you and telling you that it wasn't the president's duty are lying through their teeth.

These are the same people who have been lying for decades about Trump since he ran for president.
 
The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion

If the Fedgov is not going to perform its most basic of duties, then by all means, dissolve the bonds and start over new.
Who gets to decide if it's an invasion? The feds or the state?

Or the broader question "Who gets to decide if secession is legal? The feds or the state?"
 
West Hollywood 1924 aerial
iu


N. Beverly Drive / Olympic Blvd. 1925
Looking-north-up-Beverly-Drive-at-Olympic-Blvd-Los-Angeles-1925.jpg

N. Beverly drive / Olympic Blvd area today
Untitled.jpg
 
Last edited:
Who gets to decide if it's an invasion? The feds or the state?

Or the broader question "Who gets to decide if secession is legal? The feds or the state?"
The president gets to decide.

Its the president's number one role.

The state doesn't have the authority of national security.
 

National security lays solely with the president.

The president does it through the power of the states because states vote for the president and the presidents seal has 50 stars on it.

Do you think the federal government consulted with the governor of Hawaii or the governor of New York or the governor of Virginia when they were attacked?

Did the people blame the governor of New York when they were attacked for not stopping it and preventing it?

Did the people blame the governor of Virginia when they were attacked for not stopping it and preventing it?

Did the people blame the governor of Hawaii when they were attacked for not stopping it or preventing it?
 
Q: Who gets to decide if secession is legal? The feds or the state?

A: The winner.
If you hold a gun and I hold a gun, we can talk about the law. If you hold a knife and I hold a knife, we can talk about rules. If you come empty handed and I come empty handed, we can talk about reason. But if you have a gun, and I only have a knife, then the truth lies in your hands.
 
The governor doesn't have to say that there is a state of war for there to be one.

The president shall act preemptively if there is a threat of war.

The people gas lighting you and telling you that it wasn't the president's duty are lying through their teeth.

These are the same people who have been lying for decades about Trump since he ran for president.

How does one lie "through their teeth" ?
 
How does one lie "through their teeth" ?
Its a figure of speech.

it is believed to have roots in the 14th century. Some suggest that it may refer to the idea of a liar smiling while saying something false.

It works because of psychology.

People don't consider whether someone is confidently lying if they themselves would never tell such a lie.

It especially helps if they repeat such a lie over and over again.

The fact of the matter is Gavin Newsome politically benefits from a rebellion or an insurrection taking place.

Especially if he allows it and then blames it on Trump.

This allows the democrat party to win more elections and grab power.
 
You want a real coup in this country?

It doesn't take a majority of the people to take over a country and rule it.

It just takes the majority of the people to sit back and let it happen.

The democrats propaganda has even prepped for such an occasion.

They have repeatedly been brainwashing people into believing that the Republican party was taking over by force to rule the country.

They say the country is irredeemably bad and not worth fighting to protect.

This isn't a bug this is a feature.

"Accuse your opponent of what only you are doing, as you are doing it, to create confusion, cloud the issue, and inoculate voters against any evidence of your guilt."
 
What if the legal residents of texas decided to secede and they were joined by white people trying to escape from places like south africa. And then president gavin newsome sent in the national guard to stop the "invasion".

Be careful what you ask for.
 
Last edited:
What if texas was invaded by freedom loving white people and they decided to secede. Then president gavin newsome sent in the national guard to stop the "invasion"?

Be careful what you ask for.
We don't allow European colonialism on this continent.

You can blame Monroe for that not Gavin Newscum.
 
If you hold a gun and I hold a gun, we can talk about the law.

Not if I start shooting you.

If you hold a knife and I hold a knife, we can talk about rules.

Not if I start slashing and stabbing you.

If you come empty handed and I come empty handed, we can talk about reason.

Not if I start punching, kicking, and beating you.

But if you have a gun, and I only have a knife, then the truth lies in your hands.

Not if you sneak up behind me and stab me in the back.
 
We don't allow European colonialism on this continent.

You can blame Monroe for that not Gavin Newscum.
Ok I didn't word that as well as I should have. What if the legal residents of texas decided to secede and they were joined by white people trying to escape from places like south africa. And then president gavin newsome sent in the national guard to stop the "invasion".
 
Ok I didn't word that as well as I should have. What if the legal residents of texas decided to secede and they were joined by white people trying to escape from places like south africa. And then president gavin newsome sent in the national guard to stop the "invasion".
That would be a violation of the sovereignty of the Republic.

Calling it a succession when it would truly be a war is just sophistry.
 
Back
Top