NASA’s Hansen Exploits Hot Summers to Push Carbon Fascism

Joined
Sep 20, 2011
Messages
13,839
NASA’s Hansen Exploits Hot Summers to Push Carbon Fascism

NASA’s Hansen Exploits Hot Summers to Push Carbon Fascism


Kurt Nimmo
Infowars.com
August 8, 2012


NASA’s doctor Hansen is at it again. He says the latest round of hot weather is your fault because you create carbon emissions.

hansen460.jpg



“Dr. Hansen said that at least three extreme summers over the past decade, the 2003 heatwave in Europe which killed more than 50,000 people, the 2010 hot summer in Moscow and last year’s droughts in Texas and Oklahoma, were almost certainly the result of man-made climate change rather than natural events,” reports The Independent.

Hansen and his colleagues published their conclusion in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“Our analysis shows that it is no longer enough to say that global warming will increase the likelihood of extreme weather and to repeat the caveat that no individual weather event can be directly linked to climate change,” Hansen said in an article published in the Washington Post. “To the contrary, our analysis shows that, for the extreme hot weather of the recent past, there is virtually no explanation other than climate change.”

But wait a minute. There is another explanation, but it rarely receives press in the corporate media.

NOAA climatologists and scientists have produced reports drawing a correlation between weather and sun spot activity. Moreover, scientists at Armagh Observatory in Ireland believe the sun’s warming influence is under-estimated.


“Dr. Hansen said that at least three extreme summers over the past decade, the 2003 heatwave in Europe which killed more than 50,000 people, the 2010 hot summer in Moscow and last year’s droughts in Texas and Oklahoma, were almost certainly the result of man-made climate change rather than natural events,” reports The Independent.

Hansen and his colleagues published their conclusion in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

“Our analysis shows that it is no longer enough to say that global warming will increase the likelihood of extreme weather and to repeat the caveat that no individual weather event can be directly linked to climate change,” Hansen said in an article published in the Washington Post. “To the contrary, our analysis shows that, for the extreme hot weather of the recent past, there is virtually no explanation other than climate change.”

But wait a minute. There is another explanation, but it rarely receives press in the corporate media.

NOAA climatologists and scientists have produced reports drawing a correlation between weather and sun spot activity. Moreover, scientists at Armagh Observatory in Ireland believe the sun’s warming influence is under-estimated.


sun_euv19.gif


High solar activity of the sort we are now experiencing creates cosmic rays that reach earth and result in an absence of low clouds. “Low clouds cool the Earth by reflecting more solar radiation back into space, so a drop in the amount of low cloud contributes to global warming. High cloud does the opposite and tends to warm the Earth by reflecting more of the Earth’s infra-red radiation back to the ground” the Armagh researchers discovered.

In 2004, scientists in Germany and Finland reported that “the level of solar activity during the past 70 years is exceptional, and the previous period of equally high activity occurred more than 8,000 years ago. We find that during the past 11,400 years the Sun spent only of the order of 10% of the time at a similarly high level of magnetic activity and almost all of the earlier high-activity periods were shorter than the present episode.”

CERN, the European Organization for Nuclear Research, has also published research pointing at the sun. “Because the sun’s magnetic field controls how many cosmic rays reach Earth’s atmosphere, the sun determines the temperature on Earth,” Lawrence Solomon, director of Energy Probe, wrote in 2011. Danish Space Research scientists also reached this conclusion in 1996.

Such studies are routinely ignored or dismissed by the climate change crowd who blame you and your car, your air-conditioner, your refrigerator, and the life-saving equipment at the local hospital and other attributes of modern civilization for global climate change.

Hansen and his fellows are shamelessly exploiting the unusually hot weather created by solar activity. This is to be expected from a gaggle of humanity-hating fanatics who have suggested Chinese styled authoritarianism in order to force their agenda on the world.


original article here:
http://www.infowars.com/nasas-hansen-exploits-hot-summers-to-push-carbon-fascism/
 
But wait a minute. There is another explanation, but it rarely receives press in the corporate media.

NOAA climatologists and scientists have produced reports drawing a correlation between weather and sun spot activity. Moreover, scientists at Armagh Observatory in Ireland believe the sun’s warming influence is under-estimated.

got a source for this one?

Because I'm pretty sure it's a PRATT (point refuted a thousand times).
http://www.skepticalscience.com/solar-activity-sunspots-global-warming-advanced.htm
 
They want to militarize space in a manner that can be uncontested before folks wake up to the idea that the sun is just about ready to calm down a bit leaving us in a global cooling scenario for a few hundred years. Global warming will become a matter of national security just like every other power grabbing gag that's been used for things like having yer fellas fondled at the airport and all of that other lovely stuff...for profit/power...while the time is right and folks are still buying the whole gag about everything being a matter of national security that the elitists want to apply to infrastructure relative only to their own definition of repatriation. Because it's big business...for them.

It's a unique situation too. A matter of national security whereas there is no enemy to aim at? Folks should think about this before they just jump on the bandwagon to privatize space flight and surrender the relevant science and technology thereof to the entity at the other end of the space program. The private interests.


Now. Here is what is happening. The solar system is changing around us. And it's got nothing to do with these Hegelian ramblings from folks with a vested interest in turning true science into a trade secret of sort for those who would seek to profit from it under said terms of national security....like that nice dual citizen Chertoff did with the xray machines. How did that one work out fer yuns?
 
Last edited:
They want to militarize space in a manner that can be uncontested. Global warming will become a matter of national security just like every other gag that's been used for things like having yer fellas fondled at the airport and all of that other lovely stuff...for profit. Because it's big business.

It's a unique situation too. A matter of national security whereas there is no enemy to aim at? Folks should think about this before they just jump on the bandwagon to privatize space flight and surrender the relevant science and technology thereof to the entity at the other end of the space program. The private interests.


Now. Here is what is happening. The solar system is changing around us. And it's got nothing to do with these Hegelian ramblings from folks with a vested interest in turning true science into a trade secret of sort for those who would seek to profit from it under said terms of national security....like that nice dual citizen Chertoff did with the xray machines. How did that one work out fer yuns?

Yes the solar system is changing. Plus there is a giant ball of fire at it's center spitting out solar flares.
 
Why defund them? Best to get rid of the bad elements and take it back. There are some good people at NASA. Far moreso than those who have run it into the ground.

take it back? It is funded via theft. The only way i see to "take it back" is to defund it and let the cream of the crop move to the private sector.
 
take it back? It is funded via theft. The only way i see to "take it back" is to defund it and let the cream of the crop move to the private sector.

Yes, an argument could be made that it may be practical to do that. But the bigger issue here is that even if folks don't already realize it much of the funding already goes to private interests. I generally prefer to just use the term "space program" for that reason alone. Defunding it removes any say so one may have regarding advancement of sciences and applications relative to society's best interest in general. Is that really what you want to do? The Growth Model and survival in practical human terms are two entirely different situations. Completely opposing phenomenon too. What did you get from the bailouts? Think about that.
 
Last edited:
Then people try to say it is man made global warming.

They can try all thay want. What are they going to do when the real science community...who are becoming very politically active recently...show otherwise?

The only opposition to the spew of man made global warming is manufactured equally. Think of a false left right paradigm except in terms of scientific philosophy....then...oops. Here comes the 3rd party scientist. Gigs up...
 
They can try all thay want. What are they going to do when the real science community...who are becoming very politically active recently...show otherwise?

The only opposition to the spew of man made global warming is manufactured equally. Think of a false left right paradigm except in terms of scientific philosophy....then...oops. Here comes the 3rd party scientist. Gigs up...

True. They already have shown otherwise. It just needs to get more attention.
 
Had to hang up on a friend tonight who wanted to argue about man made global warming. Just amazes me how everyone is such an expert on the subject. Enter any question that provides a skeptical POV and plan on ridicule. No thanks, I don't have time for it. The AGW cult can fall off a cliff as far as I'm concerned. Much worse can happen to their desire for government intervention on carbon emissions.
 
Had to hang up on a friend tonight who wanted to argue about man made global warming. Just amazes me how everyone is such an expert on the subject. Enter any question that provides a skeptical POV and plan on ridicule. No thanks, I don't have time for it. The AGW cult can fall off a cliff as far as I'm concerned. Much worse can happen to their desire for government intervention on carbon emissions.

I wish I could hang up on the people I encounter in person.
 
I always ask them to explain a chart like this... still waiting.

415k-year-temp-graph.jpg

where did you get this chart? And what does it prove? Who lived 10,000 years ago, and how does that change what's going to happen next? You can either say global warming is inevitable, or that it's not happening, but not both. So I wanted to make sure I get what you are saying.
 
Back
Top