NASA To Trigger Massive Explosion On the Moon In Search of Ice

Joined
May 7, 2009
Messages
3,314
http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09/06/16/1556254


"NASA is preparing to launch the Lunar Crater Observation and Sensing Satellite, which will fly a Centaur rocket booster into the moon, triggering a six-mile-high explosion that scientists hope will confirm whether water is frozen in the perpetual darkness of craters near the moon's south pole. If the spacecraft launches on schedule at 12:51 p.m. Wednesday, it will hit the moon in the early morning hours of October 8 after an 86-day Lunar Gravity-Assist, Lunar Return Orbit that will allow the spacecraft time to complete its two-month commissioning phase and conduct nearly a month of science data collection of polar crater measurements before colliding with the moon just 10 minutes behind the Centaur."


"The cloud from the Centaur rocket booster will kick up 350 metric tons of debris that should spread six miles above the surface of the moon, hitting the sunlight and making it visible to amateur astronomers across North America. Over the final four minutes of its existence, as LCROSS follows the same terminal trajectory as the Centaur, the spacecraft will train its instruments and cameras on the debris cloud, searching it for the chemical signature of water. Previous spacecraft and ground-based instruments have detected signs of hydrogen near the moon's poles, and scientists are split over whether that is from ice that could have arrived through the impact of comets or by other means. Despite all the serious scientific talk about hydrogen signatures and lunar regolith, flying a rocket booster into the moon at 5,600 mph to trigger a massive explosion is just flat-out cool. 'We're certainly going to be making a big splash,' says Kimberly Ennico, the LCROSS payload scientist. 'We're going to see something, but I don't know what to expect. I know on the night of the impact, I'll be running on adrenaline.'"
 
What if the people living on the moon see that as an act of aggression and fire back!
 
During the decade of the Sixties, mankind became infused and enthused by the desire to reach the moon. It was peaceful exploration in a world consumed by the Cold War; it was an overarching curiosity; it was a barrier unbroken. And we reached it!

So, what did we find? More shit to blow up, of course...
 
they getting desperate or something?

Yep, as they have not gotten everyone on board with the global tax on global warming they will now attempt to change the orbit of the moon, thus creating unstable weather patterns.;:p:D
 
Yep, as they have not gotten everyone on board with the global tax on global warming they will now attempt to change the orbit of the moon, thus creating unstable weather patterns.;:p:D

you know... I could believe that eventually. :eek:
 
I guess a missile is cheaper than a form of satellite-based ground penetrating radar.



Russia proposes mining helium-3 on Moon (commerce to space)

MOSCOW. Jan 25 (Interfax) - Russia's Energia aerospace corporation is doing research on a project to mine helium-3, a potential fuel for future nuclear reactors, on the Moon and bring it to the Earth, and is due to finish the study before 2010, Energia President Nikolai Sevastyanov said on Wednesday.

The Earth's known hydrocarbon reserves will last mankind "50 to 100 years with the present-day rate of consumption," Sevastyanov told a meeting at the Bauman State Technological University in Moscow.

"There are practically no reserves of helium on the Earth. On the Moon, there are between 1 million and 500 million tonnes, according to various estimates," he said.


http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1565180/posts
 
Yep, as they have not gotten everyone on board with the global tax on global warming they will now attempt to change the orbit of the moon, thus creating unstable weather patterns.;:p:D

Yeah - slightly altering the moons orbit and messing up the weather was the second thing that I thought of, though it gets pounded by comets regularly.

The first thing that came to mind was that supposedly a big piece of moon was what caused the extermination of the dinosaurs. Hope they don't knock off more than they bargained for. Then even if it's only small bits, it's only a matter of time before one of them says "hi" to a satellite, rocket or space shuttle II+...

Wasn't it Heinlein that wrote that book about a war between the Moon and earth - where the moon residents hurled large rocks at Earth?

yeah, this doesn't seem like a great idea.

-t
 
Why should we be forced to fund NASA? Especially when they are doing crap like this?
 
Actually this is a very good thing that they are doing. But it should be done under the auspices of defense research.

Wow dude, this is coming from a Ron Paul supporter?

Don't come crying when we receive blowback from the moon beings..
 
I've got to agree with Matt on this one. It's good they are doing it, it's HOW they are doing it that give me a "this could come out badly" feeling in the pit of my stomach.

Really, the ability to columnize the moon depends on one of 2 things: Finding water there or finding a way to cheaply get water there.

It would have great benefits - mining, space launch platform, manufacture of perfect bearings, fantastic place to build an observatory... - stuff like that...

-t
 
Well, this can further any conspiracy theory one may have surrounding space and the moon.

Though, I don't profess yet to say that anything interesting will happen.
 
we won't always have a moon. it is slowly moving farther away from us.

Well, now that they've started #^@%*&+ with it, don't be too sure. They could wind up inadvertantly parking it in the Pacific and washing California off the map. Sometimes I think the only things the Federal Government are good for are enforcing the Law of Unintended Consequences--and Murphy's Law, of course.
 
Who needs the moon? :rolleyes:

I'm guessing that is sarcasm... :rolleyes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon#Ocean_tides

Torchbearer said:
we won't always have a moon. it is slowly moving farther away from us.

"The effect on the Moon's orbital radius is a small one, just 0.10 ppb/year, but results in a measurable 3.82 cm annual increase in the Earth-Moon distance.[55]

Cumulatively, this effect becomes ever more significant over time; since astronauts first landed on the Moon approximately 40 years ago, it is 1.52 metres farther away."​

lol...
 
Back
Top