Matt Collins
Member
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 47,707
Oh you mean like actually making Constitutional Carry law?Straight out of the NAGR playbook (and following what they’ve done in Mississippi and elsewhere)

Oh you mean like actually making Constitutional Carry law?Straight out of the NAGR playbook (and following what they’ve done in Mississippi and elsewhere)

I don't know anything about them... are they willing to force a full recorded floor vote on Constitutional Carry?
No shit you don't know anything about them. And yet you accused them of being anti gun. That should be all any rational person needs to know about you.I don't know anything about them... are they willing to force a full recorded floor vote on Constitutional Carry?
No.Oh you mean like actually making Constitutional Carry law?![]()
![]()
Perhaps that is the whole problem. NCGR moved into GRNC space without even....consulting? Didn't call them on the phone? No? They were just going to adopt the acronym and start shit? Does that sound like a winning plan? Or does it seem like a sleazy money grabbing slime.
As a Cackalackian it seems pretty sleazy money grabbing operation to me.
So tell me, if these guys are so good why is the word spreading that they are shysters?
Well they pissed me off pretty good but now that Matt Collins has compounded it I will be devoting my 2nd Amendment speech to the NCRLC tomorrow night to exposing these criminals as the enemies of NC gun owners they are.
Answer the question: are they willing to force a full recorded roll call vote to the floor? Yes, or no?No shit you don't know anything about them. And yet you accused them of being anti gun. That should be all any rational person needs to know about you.
This statement presupposes that GRNC has some sort of monopoly or ownership over the pro-gun rights movement in NC.Perhaps that is the whole problem. NCGR moved into GRNC space without even....consulting?
Honestly, no, they probably didn't. And when I worked there I did encourage them to do more outreach like that in order to prevent or at least minimize butthurt like this. See my next line below:Didn't call them on the phone?
Because people get emotional when the professionals move in after years and years of doing the same thing. It's like a band that suddenly becomes popular and mainstream, the original fan base accuses them of selling out. It's just human nature. People have vested interests in keeping their little fiefdom and are tribal and territorial.So tell me, if these guys are so good why is the word spreading that they are shysters?
LOL, I am sure that will make a huge difference ha ha haWell they pissed me off pretty good but now that Matt Collins has compounded it I will be devoting my 2nd Amendment speech to the NCRLC tomorrow night to exposing these criminals as the enemies of NC gun owners they are.

This statement presupposes that GRNC has some sort of monopoly or ownership over the pro-gun rights movement in NC.
You have no clue how things work. NAGR's list is at LEAST 10 times bigger than the list that the local group has, guaranteed.To steal an acronym and make the local grass roots org. seem like bad guys is going to fail. And I'm going to help it fail.
You have no clue how things work. NAGR's list is at LEAST 10 times bigger than the list that the local group has, guaranteed.To steal an acronym and make the local grass roots org. seem like bad guys is going to fail. And I'm going to help it fail.
You have no clue how things work. NAGR's list is at LEAST 10 times bigger than the list that the local group has, guaranteed.
You have no clue how things work. NAGR's list is at LEAST 10 times bigger than the list that the local group has, guaranteed.
Nice to see you being a traitor to the cause of freedom though.
Oh,, you know something about lists of donors?
You obviously do not know how the North Carolina General Assembly even works. Which is even more evidence that you and your shit-stack ilk need to stay the fk out of North Carolina.Answer the question: are they willing to force a full recorded roll call vote to the floor? Yes, or no?
This statement presupposes that GRNC has some sort of monopoly or ownership over the pro-gun rights movement in NC.
Honestly, no, they probably didn't. And when I worked there I did encourage them to do more outreach like that in order to prevent or at least minimize butthurt like this. See my next line below:
Because people get emotional when the professionals move in after years and years of doing the same thing. It's like a band that suddenly becomes popular and mainstream, the original fan base accuses them of selling out. It's just human nature. People have vested interests in keeping their little fiefdom and are tribal and territorial.
That being said, even if NAGR did do some grassroots warming up in advance, as I recommended when I worked there, it probably wouldn't change some people's attitudes because of the jealousy aspect (see Gunny). I had the same problem in WV with the locals too though.
I guess over the years they have found it better just to not pre-warn the local groups that they are setting up shop so that the local groups get less advance notice to be able to undermine their efforts.
Actions speak louder than wordsBullshit. You obviously do not have the first clue about what motivates me. Your constant inaccurate speculation about my jealousy or my drunkenness further demonstrates that you are talking out of your ass
In the House rule #39 and in the Senate rule #47. While a discharge in the Senate is not possible unless someone in leadership is on your side, it is possible in the House.You obviously do not know how the North Carolina General Assembly even works. Which is even more evidence that you and your shit-stack ilk need to stay the fk out of North Carolina.

In the House rule #39 and in the Senate rule #47. While a discharge in the Senate is not possible unless someone in leadership is on your side, it is possible in the House.
Barring a discharge petition, make a motion to amend a bill on the floor with Constitutional Carry language. If they rule it non-germane then challenge the decision of the chair with a roll call vote. That is the recorded vote for or against ConCarry. Or one could simply push to suspend the rules in order to bring a bill to the floor. That is also the recorded vote you need. Either way, you then have a nice list of legislators who are for and against ConCarry. Procedural votes count too.
Do I have to spell everything out for you?![]()
Second, North Carolina does not allow off-topic amendments, and the Bill Sponsor must approve any amendment that changes the title. There is no appeal.