Ralph Nader is endorsing Ron Paul? This doesnt make any sense, they seem like complete opposites to me. Could someone help me understand.
Too funny. Um, I guess here is as good a place to confess as any: I voted for Nader last time and am as hardcore a Paul supporter as one can get ("found" him when he was in Congress and I was in high school looking for my philosophical home back in the early '80s, voted for him in 1988, was rooting for him in 1992 against Bush until Buchanan got in and Paul endorsed him and withdrew--yes, Dr. Paul was briefly running for the Republican presidential nomination then, and worked for him as a legislative aide from 1997-2001, and still do whatever I can for him.).
So, yes, there is a great deal of overlap. I know, I worked closely with the Naderites while working for Dr. Paul against corporate welfare (IMF, export subsidies, etc.), defending privacy and civil liberties, upholding the rule of law against the arbitrariness of government, against the drug war, supporting a more level playing field for third parties and independents, a healthy skepticism of the Federal Reserve, and against a militarily interventionist foreign policy, etc.
In fact, in the first election after 9/11, I thought a Lebanese-American giving interviews in Arabic on Middle Eastern TV would do more to make this country safer than any USA PATRIOT Acts, military invasions, etc., would ever achieve.
The Constitution Party was not on the ballot in DC and, no offense to anyone here, but I considered Badnarik a joke (just a personal opinion, not wanting to start a fight). So yes, I voted for Nader.
Incidentally, the guy de facto running Nader's race, a friendly colleague of mine, then ran for the Senate in Maryland as a "fusion" candidate of the Green, Libertarian, and I think it was the Populist parties.